Seems alot of pixelation is going on there.
I'm actually happy with the quality. I was expecting it to be a lot worse!!! Plus the HD video that Engadget posted just blew me away!
Wow, that camera is crap. Oh well, I guess it's to be expected with such a low res. Like the camera in my iPhone 3G, I wouldn't want to use it unless there is no other option and I just need a basic pic. Guess that means I'll still have to use the 3GS' camera for now.
I don't understand these types of comments. What type of camera did you expect? What sort of pictures were you planning to take with it?
For around $300 you get a device that can be used for so many purposes. People keep compairing the iPhone 4 and the 4th Gen iPod Touch but they are seperate products. I'm not familiar with the iPhone 4 pricing but I'm guessing if you bought one with no contract you would be paying almost double the price. For that extra cash you can expect to get features not offered in the new iPod.
People needs to realize the fact that ipod touch is an mp3 player...
Camera is an additional feature. Tell me an mp3 player that has not one, but two cameras.
I don't understand these types of comments. What type of camera did you expect? What sort of pictures were you planning to take with it?
For around $300 you get a device that can be used for so many purposes. People keep compairing the iPhone 4 and the 4th Gen iPod Touch but they are seperate products. I'm not familiar with the iPhone 4 pricing but I'm guessing if you bought one with no contract you would be paying almost double the price. For that extra cash you can expect to get features not offered in the new iPod.
I'll start off with this: I use a D200 and it is the first Digital camera I've been actually happy with. Generally, I use the iPhone 3GS camera for quick shots of text like tracking numbers, computer service tags, products to research, etc. Based on that, being able to clearly read text in the photo is important. I KNOW that phone cameras suck in general, I don't expect much out of them.
However, they have been getting increasingly better over the past few years. I'd say the camera in the 3GS is the first one that was "acceptable" in responsiveness and picture quality. From what I've heard and seen, the iPhone 4 improves on that greatly.
Apple put a camera in the iPod Touch because everyone bitched that it didn't have one. "Fine guys, here you go, now go away and stop asking for it." seems to have been Apple's response.
In the "how hard can it be?" category and basic expectations for any camera:
These days, how hard can it be to put a camera that takes sharp, clear, detailed pictures? I'm not asking for pro-level DSLR/mega megapixel photos, but the amount of pixellation, lack of clarity in those demo pics really is very low-end consumer level at best.
This coming from someone who didn't really care if the iTouch had a camera or two, I want it for the music. But if you're going to do something (and you're Apple), do it right.
(and please, please release a 128GB model next time around)