Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,523
30,815



103327-songs_app_store_growth.jpg


Asymco offers an interesting graph showing the relative growth of iTunes song and App Store downloads over their respective histories, demonstrating the App Store's meteoric growth that is setting it up to pass the music portion of Apple's media store in total downloads in the relatively near future.
As can be seen, the App store has reached the same total downloads in 2.2 years as the iTMS reached after five years. The two curves are likely to be the same height (around 13 billion each) before the year is over.
We're not convinced that the catch will happen by the end of the year, but it certainly appears that the App Store is on pace to come out on top sometime next year. App Store downloads have totaled about 500 million per month over the past six months, while song downloads have stagnated at about 250 million per month for the past year or so.

Given that the music side currently holds about a 5 billion download lead over the App Store, that would imply that it will be about 20 months before the App Store takes the lead. Of course, given the acceleration in App Store downloads against stagnant song downloads, the catch will likely happen significantly sooner that that. We do not, however, see the App Store averaging the over 1.5 billion downloads per month that would appear to be necessary to catch the song download total by the end of this year.

It can also be argued that the comparison is one of apples to oranges, as the majority of applications available through the App Store are available free of charge, while only a small handful of song tracks are free at any given time. Regardless, Apple has long viewed its iTunes music downloads and App Store primarily as break-even businesses, designed much more to boost hardware sales than to generate profits on their own.

Article Link: App Store's Meteoric Growth Compared to iTunes Song Downloads
 

Shaun.P

macrumors 68000
Jul 14, 2003
1,601
24
Omicron Persei 8
Interesting graph. It looks like the app store purchases will be level with the iTunes purchases in about 7-8 months down the line.
 

FFArchitect

macrumors regular
Mar 14, 2010
196
0
Apps is where it's at.

Now if there were only a TV appliance that could use apps. Hmm.
 

Maclver

macrumors 68030
Nov 23, 2008
2,661
2,036
New Mexico
Apps is where it's at.

Now if there were only a TV appliance that could use apps. Hmm.

Say the Apple TV could run apps how great would the apps be? esspcially when TV sizes are so different and the quality of the picture is different for each tv. If they were to ever do this and it was the quality equal to running an iPhone app on the iPad then no thanks!
 

sportsfan

macrumors regular
Nov 13, 2009
211
68
purchases?

Interesting graph. It looks like the app store purchases will be level with the iTunes purchases in about 7-8 months down the line.

That's the key word....it only says DOWNLOADS. Which makes sense due to all the free apps.
 

nwcs

macrumors 68030
Sep 21, 2009
2,722
5,262
Tennessee
I think the comparison is a bit unfair. The idea of downloading things took time to reach the common person. Also the number of devices available plays a role. People also had lots of CDs available to rip reducing the need to go to iTunes but they didn't have apps hanging around.

What I take out of this is that physical media is definitely going to be declining. One way or another things will be moving to online digital formats. It'll probably kill the secondary market for things, too. I can resell a DVD but I can't resell anything I buy off of iTunes.
 

I is Mac

macrumors newbie
Sep 3, 2010
27
0
Ok peeps start downloading random apps now so we can overtake those fascist music companies in downloads even faster!
 

Tux Kapono

macrumors member
Jun 4, 2003
52
6
Imagine what the iTunes song chart would look like if most of its library were free like the App Store. This chart is as misleading as it gets.

I'd like to see PAID iTunes songs versus PAID apps.
 

NickK1066

macrumors regular
Jul 23, 2007
147
0
I think the graphs are missing a critical metric - the number of handsets in the market.

iPod expanded and took iTunes along with it. Hence it's progressive take up.

Apps store then had an established market that would easily move to apps-capable iPods/iPhones.

Add to this that the iTunes songs are resold music where Apple and the music firms are all fighting over the money. So the amount of music new music appearing is constrained by the music companies.
The apps store is 'open' to any developer or company to create their own applications without constraints (including free).

Now if Apple had self publication of music in addition to books and apps perhaps we'd see a increase in new and inventive music out there each year..
 

emptyCup

macrumors 65816
Jan 5, 2005
1,482
1
I think the comparison is a bit unfair.

I agree with the points you make. Additionally, no one owned any apps two years ago but they already owned most of the songs in their collection before iTunes. Add in that they are not counting Podcasts or iTunes U or anything free except the Song of the Week and I think the numbers are undoubtedly off. However, as others have pointed out, the trends are clear: Apps are in, digital media is on its way out.
 

NebulaClash

macrumors 68000
Feb 4, 2010
1,810
0
As noted, there are many more millions of iPods and iPhones out there now than when the music store first opened. Larger market = faster uptake of products.
 

notjustjay

macrumors 603
Sep 19, 2003
6,056
167
Canada, eh?
I'd like to see PAID iTunes songs versus PAID apps.

Or total dollars spent.

I know I've downloaded a ton of free apps, judged them to be crap, and deleted them within seconds.

Having said that, I'm also happy to spend a dollar, five bucks, even ten or twenty bucks, on an app that's well written and does what I want it to do.
 

melgross

macrumors 6502
Jan 23, 2004
446
394
New York City
That's the key word....it only says DOWNLOADS. Which makes sense due to all the free apps.

Except that the article is wrong. There have been other articles that show only about 30% of apps in the store are free. 70% cost.

In fact this is a big difference between iOS apps and those for Android, where most are free, but lower quality.
 

Bonte

macrumors 65816
Jul 1, 2002
1,163
505
Bruges, Belgium
Imagine what the iTunes song chart would look like if most of its library were free like the App Store. This chart is as misleading as it gets.

I'd like to see PAID iTunes songs versus PAID apps.

More like revenue generated, apps and iBooks books tend to be more expensive than songs.
 

jb510

macrumors regular
Sep 19, 2007
167
9
The first line of the last paragraph says it all. I'd like to see paid vs paid... and I'd like to see a revenue comparison as well.
 

FFArchitect

macrumors regular
Mar 14, 2010
196
0
Say the Apple TV could run apps how great would the apps be? esspcially when TV sizes are so different and the quality of the picture is different for each tv. If they were to ever do this and it was the quality equal to running an iPhone app on the iPad then no thanks!

Pretty sure that can be overcome. The challenges are less than conquering mobile with limited memory, battery, etc.
 

WiiDSmoker

macrumors 68000
Sep 15, 2009
1,886
7,325
Dallas, TX
Say the Apple TV could run apps how great would the apps be? esspcially when TV sizes are so different and the quality of the picture is different for each tv. If they were to ever do this and it was the quality equal to running an iPhone app on the iPad then no thanks!

Just program for 720P/1080P. Not hard.
 

mattwolfmatt

macrumors 65816
Jun 7, 2008
1,085
197
Ugh - another graph showing total downloads. More interesting would be downloads PER MONTH - then it will better show rises and falls, instead of slower rises and faster rises.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.