sigamy said:No offense to the above poster, but I've NEVER heard good things about the Canon ZR line. I owned one of the first, the ZR10, so I speak from experience. The ZR line is terrible in normal indoor lighting. They call this "low light" capability but this does not mean darkness or night shooting. This is normal household lighting in the evening.
I go back and look at video I took of my newborn son and it is almost unwatchable. The video suffered from excessive grain and noise.
Sony's Handycams do much better in low light. The 2003 lineup of TRV19/22/33 were very good and the 2004 HC20/30/40 are pretty good also. I upgraded to a Sony TRV22 and there was a huge difference in indoor video quality.
The middle-tier Canons like the Elura and Optura are better than the Canon ZRs.
Panasonic is getting very good reviews for their consumer 3CCD cams. Check out the GS120. Only negative on this cam is that the image stabiliaztion is not very good above 5x zoom.
Sony's do most things well, but they don't do anything outstanding. Good image quality, very good stabilzation and night shot.
If you want to edit the footage on your Mac then do not buy a DVD-based camcorder. There are many head-aches in getting this video onto your Mac to be edited. Plus, you are paying much more for the same video quality, same optics, etc. You are paying for the convience of recording to DVD. This is great for grandparents or soccer moms. If you want to edit in iMovie or Final Cut get a MiniDV cam.
Stick with Sony, Panny or Canon (non-ZR) and you'll be fine. Buy from a good dealer where you can return it. Take video in a bunch of different settings/lighting and make sure that you get good quality video by checking thru your TV--don't use the LCD or your computer to judge the video qualtiy.
johnnyjibbs said:Just stay clear of DVD-writing camcorders or Sony's Micro MV ones (Sony still makes Mini-DV ones).
JLaFrance said:Which of those, if any have a firewire interface? Also, what is "MiniDV"? Is it a tape or what. An all digital inerface would be best wouldnt it? Since the media wouldn't degrade nearly as fast?
gwangung said:Damn near every camcorder these days worth its salt has a Firewire interface (and all of these have them).
Mini-DV is a tape format (marked on all tapes), smaller than the Hi 8 format.
I think you do want a tape drive - if you want to easily import and edit your footage. None of the DVD-based camcorders I've seen (yet) have Firewire ports, so there's no way to import digitally aside from reading the DVDs - if your Mac can do that (presumably, it can, aside from DVD-RAM format).JLaFrance said:So, if I don't want a tape drive, and I don't want a DVD, what are my alternatives?
mrgreen4242 said:Ok -
How about a mini-DV camera for someone who is cheap/poor/not in need of anything special...
I just need to be able to identify who is on camera and hear what they have to say w/o any massive amounts of background noise from the tape mechanism.
Used, refurb, close outs... whats the cheapest miniDV camcorder on the market (that doesn't have any show stopping flaws)?
I'm afraid they only work with PCs and, I think, Sony's proprietary software (I don't even think you can get Microsoft's Movie Maker 2 software, bundled with Windows XP, to recognise it, but I could be wrong). My friend had one of these cameras. Not a sausage when I hooked it up to my Mac.dav said:Too bad thats what I have (MicroMV). What are my options?
JLaFrance said:Which of those, if any have a firewire interface? Also, what is "MiniDV"? Is it a tape or what. An all digital inerface would be best wouldnt it? Since the media wouldn't degrade nearly as fast?
JLaFrance said:So, if I don't want a tape drive, and I don't want a DVD, what are my alternatives?
dav said:Too bad thats what I have (MicroMV). What are my options?