Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ibjoshua

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jan 17, 2002
610
19
New Zealand
We have the hardware all we need is for Apple to write the software.

You plug a Shuffle into the USB port on the Airport Express and your Mac keeps shunting down files as needed. Any real time change made in iTunes would be seamlessly streamed to the Express to avoid any lag but playlist changes would involve moving compressed files.

Why?

Well, you'd effectively have a cache which would continue playing seamlessly if you had a network outage or if your Mac crashed (yeah right), shut down or went to sleep. This would allow you to regain some of that bandwidth that the lossless streaming must use up and also free up your mac a little too.

What do you kids think?

i_b_joshua
 

crazzyeddie

macrumors 68030
Dec 7, 2002
2,792
1
Florida, USA
Is your music really that important that you need a cache to back it up for the 3 minutes that it takes to reboot? :confused: Why not just hook your iPod (any type) directly to your stereo so you can play it without any wasted bandwidth or CPU power.
 

ChrisBrightwell

macrumors 68020
Apr 5, 2004
2,294
0
Huntsville, AL
crazzyeddie said:
Why not just hook your iPod (any type) directly to your stereo so you can play it without any wasted bandwidth or CPU power.
Because that's not as cool. Duh.

I'd actually really like to be able to plug a USB hard drive into the Airport Express and have it accessible over the network. If there's one thing I'd change about the Express, that's it.
 

jimsowden

macrumors 68000
Sep 6, 2003
1,766
18
NY
When i saw it, I thought the shuffle would be a controller for the express, letting you advance songs and such. I don't think it does that, though.
 

ibjoshua

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jan 17, 2002
610
19
New Zealand
crazzyeddie said:
Is your music really that important that you need a cache to back it up for the 3 minutes that it takes to reboot? :confused: Why not just hook your iPod (any type) directly to your stereo so you can play it without any wasted bandwidth or CPU power.

Because the shuffle doesn't have an interface and this configuration would give you the convenience of AirTunes but without the overheads.

It would of course also serve as a dock (which has questionable value).

I'm not suggesting any hardware just some programming.

i_b_joshua
 

PlaceofDis

macrumors Core
Jan 6, 2004
19,241
6
vollspacken said:
I think it would be cool if you could plug an USB-dongle into the Express and remote control Airtunes with a remote... (yes, my tiBook does not have bluetooth)

vSpacken

the closest you can come to controlling your tunes while away from your computer is this:

http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/airclick/

you dont have to be in the same room so it seems like a viable option if you ask me, and would work well so long as you are in range of your 'book/mac

hey at least its a start in the right direction
 

wPod

macrumors 68000
Aug 19, 2003
1,654
0
Denver, CO
PlaceofDis said:
the closest you can come to controlling your tunes while away from your computer is this:

http://www.griffintechnology.com/products/airclick/

you dont have to be in the same room so it seems like a viable option if you ask me, and would work well so long as you are in range of your 'book/mac

hey at least its a start in the right direction

that would be cool if you could plug it into the express!

there is the keyspan express remote ( http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/urm17a/ ) that plugs into the airport express. but its IR so you need direct line of site to get it to work well (i have this same remote except the non express version, i wonder if there is any software to get it to work with the express. . . hmmmm)
 

PlaceofDis

macrumors Core
Jan 6, 2004
19,241
6
wPod said:
that would be cool if you could plug it into the express!

there is the keyspan express remote ( http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/urm17a/ ) that plugs into the airport express. but its IR so you need direct line of site to get it to work well (i have this same remote except the non express version, i wonder if there is any software to get it to work with the express. . . hmmmm)

well the good thing about the griffin remote is that you dont need to have direct line of sight, so long as you are within 60 ft range of your computer it would be a viable control for the airport streaming tunes, its not the best alternative, but it would work for basic functionality
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.