I may be way off here but after reading the post about how tiger will affect memory hungry applications and reading a review of the imac I've had an idea.
In a set of benchmarks run by a popular mac website (tests were run to check apple's claims of the g5 imac being something like 100% faster than the g4 with ut04) it was noted that the g5 performance with the hard disc was very restricted even performing worse than an emac in some cases (or on the same level) and a tech explained that this was because of the g5 architechture (not just the imac).
What was said was that the hard disc was starved of bandwidth to allow the g5 better access to system memory-so does this mean that tiger will address this issue and we will see a huge boost in performance where in certain configurations because of the g5 architechture, system memory will be more heavily relied on (because it is faster than a disc anyway) and this will explain apple's apparently bizzare decision concering bandwidth allocation?
I am not remotely qualified to do anything other than speculate....
but if a 64 bit os basically affects ram use and the g5 has more bandwidth for ram at the expense of Hard drive performance... well this is a rumors site
Can anyone shed some light here? Am I barking up the wrong tree? Am I about to be taken to court by Apple?
Just kidding but thats my train of thought on this issue.
I'm off now to find the article that put this idea in my head.