PDA

View Full Version : A Vast Right Wing Conspiracy?




Xtremehkr
Feb 22, 2005, 11:16 AM
Link (http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/FreeCongressEssay.html)

Our movement will be entirely destructive, and entirely constructive. We will not try to reform the existing institutions. We only intend to weaken them, and eventually destroy them. We will endeavor to knock our opponents off-balance and unsettle them at every opportunity. All of our constructive energies will be dedicated to the creation of our own institutions.


We will maintain a constant barrage of criticism against the Left. We will attack the very legitimacy of the Left. We will not give them a moment's rest. We will endeavor to prove that the Left does not deserve to hold sway over the heart and mind of a single American. We will offer constant reminders that there is an alternative, there is a better way. When people have had enough of the sickness and decay of today's American culture, they will be embraced by and welcomed into the New Traditionalist movement. The rejection of the existing society by the people will thus be accomplished by pushing them and pulling them simultaneously.


We will use guerrilla tactics to undermine the legitimacy of the dominant regime. We will take advantage of every available opportunity to spread the idea that there is something fundamentally wrong with the existing state of affairs. For example, we could have every member of the movement put a bumper sticker on his car that says something to the effect of "Public Education is Rotten; Homeschool Your Kids." This will change nobody's mind immediately; no one will choose to stop sending his children to public schools immediately after seeing such a bumper sticker; but it will raise awareness and consciousness that there is a problem. Most of all, it will contribute to a vague sense of uneasiness and dissatisfaction with existing society. We need this if we hope to start picking people off and bringing them over to our side. We need to break down before we can build up. We must first clear away the flotsam of a decayed culture.


In terms of our long term prospects, because we will be seen as a purely defensive movement, not interested in imposing our views on anyone, only interested in being left alone, we will surely gain the sympathy of the public. The dominant culture will see its life-force being sapped, and it will grow terrified. It will do whatever it takes to destroy its assailant. This will lead to the perception that the dominant leftist culture is empty, hollow, desperate, and has lost its mandate to rule, because its only basis for authority is coercion, much like the communist East Bloc. Sympathy from the American people will increase as our opponents try to persecute us, which means our strength will increase at an accelerating rate due to more defections--and the enemy will collapse as a result.

Nice.

The Movement Must Understand What Motivates Human Beings


We must perform a brutally honest analysis of what motivates human beings. We must understand what makes them tick, whether that motivation is attractive or not. We must channel undesirable impulses to serve good purposes. For example, it is important to emphasize that the alternative counter-culture must be just that--alternative. It must be different from anything people are familiar with. It is a basic fact that an us-versus-them, insider-versus-outsider mentality is a very strong motivation in human life. For better or for worse, this has to be recognized and taken advantage of for the good of the movement.


Moreover, the New Traditionalists must be interested in learning about sociology, social psychology, and the dynamics of social change. We must study examples of dissident and counter-cultural groups that succeeded in ascending to dominance--we must learn from them.


We must recognize the world as it is, not as we may like it to be; but we must never let this line of thinking descend into cynicism.

Rush? Sean? Michael?

Support of an Elite More Valuable than Support of the Masses


We will initially operate according to the belief that it is more important to win over the elites (or create a new, better one) than to build up a mass movement. Furthermore, it is more important to have a few impassioned members than a large number of largely indifferent members. The amount of energy, élan, and self-assurance that we are able to inculcate in the leaders of our movement will ultimately determine its success or failure.


The new movement must be, in part, exclusive and elite. It must not be afraid to pass along a body of knowledge that is not readily accessible to and understandable by everyone. The strong appeal of a feeling of exclusivity and superiority will give our members a reason to endure the slings and arrows of popular disapproval.


The New Traditionalist movement will appeal to the masses, but not immediately. The ideas of the masses never come from the masses. To the extent that the masses are more conservative than the elites, this is primarily because the masses have a long collective memory, and they still value the beliefs articulated by a long-lost elite. The conservative instincts of the American people will continue to erode unless a new elite is formed to refresh that memory.


We must recognize that literature and philosophy do not appeal to the masses. This is why we must develop ways to spread our philosophy using non-rational means--especially the moving image.

Wow, they really think people are stupid.

There is no medium more conducive to propagandistic purposes than the moving image, and our movement must learn to make use of this medium. A skillfully produced motion picture or television documentary has tremendous persuasive power. It has the power to bypass not only the old prejudices that have been assiduously cultivated by the Left over the past few decades, but also the innate skepticism of the viewer, the resistance to new ideas. Rational arguments simply do not have this power, and all arguments made in print tend to appeal to the rational, critical faculties of the mind to a greater or lesser degree.

Pretty pictures for stupid people.

Fascinating reading all in all. Probably just more tinfoil hat stuff though.



blackfox
Feb 22, 2005, 11:22 AM
WTF is that?!

"dominionism"? There's a catchy moniker...

It is as idiotic as it is ironic.

What are they teaching in our schools? (shameless cross-thread sarcastic reference)

relimw
Feb 22, 2005, 11:36 AM
Ok, I'm curious, who is Eric Heubeck?
All I can find on him (via google) is links back to this article.
And why are we even talking about an article written in 2001? Rather old news, don't ya think? :)

Xtremehkr
Feb 22, 2005, 01:14 PM
Ok, I'm curious, who is Eric Heubeck?
All I can find on him (via google) is links back to this article.
And why are we even talking about an article written in 2001? Rather old news, don't ya think? :)

Not if it has become political practice.

Xtremehkr
Feb 22, 2005, 01:24 PM
It was taken from this Kos Diary, (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/2/22/52445/5911) which also describes how it is currently being put into practise by Karl Rove.

"Each Wednesday Rove dispatches a top administration official to attend the regular conservative-coalition lunches held at Paul Weyrich's Free Congress Foundation. When activists call his office with a problem, Rove doesn't pass them off to an aide. He often responds himself. When Weyrich heard a few weeks ago that Bush's budget slashed funding for a favorite project called the Police Corps, which gives scholarships and training to police cadets, he complained to the White House. To Weyrich's surprise, Rove called back. "We've taken care of it," Rove said. "The problem is solved." Weyrich, who says his memos to the Reagan and Bush Sr. White Houses were rarely read, was impressed. "That," he gushes, "is what it means to have friends in the White House."

It shows a clear link between the Whithouse and this organization. It doesn't matter if it was written 4 years ago, it shows clear intent. Even collaboration between what this person was suggesting and what the Whithouse is doing.

Where does it all lead? To the Leadership Institute (http://www.leadershipinstitute.org/04RESOURCES/07Links.htm) which amazingly offers courses on how to accomplish all of the things outlined.

mactastic
Feb 22, 2005, 06:59 PM
And why are we even talking about an article written in 2001? Rather old news, don't ya think? :)

Dunno, ask the RNC why they're circulating a hit piece on Harry Reid with statements he made from waaayyy back when. Old news, right? ;)

Thomas Veil
Feb 22, 2005, 09:38 PM
Funny you mentioned Rove, Xtremehkr. When I read that quote in your initial post, his name was the first thing that leapt to my mind.

There are so many adjectives I could use to describe that philosophy: cynical (in the extreme), manipulative, corrupt, Machiavellian, sociopathic...but there's one word that I think describes it best of all: evil.

mischief
Feb 23, 2005, 10:33 AM
No surprise here.

Every expansive, young empire that's had success without serious repercussions eventually spawns it's own Hellchild regime of psychotic totalitarians. This is a sign of the end of National adolescence.

We're seeing our version of the Torquemada (sp?), the 3rd reich, the Sun King, The Plantageanates (sp?), Nero/Caligula, Stalinist Bolsheviks, The Maoist Regime, etc.

These people are now just solidifying power. They've convinced the majority of the voting public that they know best and that the liberties in the Constitution are no longer unalienable.

Their strategy is as easy to track as their general ideological profile. These are anti-semitic christian fundamentalists bent on global domination backed up by divine right and millitary force. They have chosen to ally openly with Israel while stirring the hornet's nest of those who want Israel gone. This technique nearly assures an apocalyptic conflict in the middle east that will cripple the heart of the two competing Abrahamic religions and slaughter millions of people these Facists hate.

We are entering a decade in which America will spawn the most terrible despot the earth has ever seen.

The conspiracy sites are looking too hard for something that is plainly obvious and exaggerating the minutae to a level that distracts from the core problem: This nation is willingly allowing a genocidal, psychotic group of fanatics to take control of the single most powerful nation in history and weapons our ancestors would never have believed nor wanted to think could ever be concieved.

This despot may not be GWB but I guarantee Rove will pick the centerpiece in this immensely evil plot.

Thomas Veil
Feb 23, 2005, 12:37 PM
We are entering a decade in which America will spawn the most terrible despot the earth has ever seen.Lest anyone think mischief is being melodramatic, I've had thoughts along similar lines.

The neo-cons' plan for this country -- outlined in the Project for the New American Century -- dictates that never again will the United States let any nation challenge its dominance in the world. We start by waging war against terrorist (or at least evil) nations...with the rest of the world watching and wondering who's next. We thus confirm terrorists' worst fears, which in turn helps them obtain even more recruits; and we worry our allies.

What happens on the day when we go too far, when even our allies begin to view us not only with suspicion but with outright alarm? At the point when our allies finally decide to stop just watching from the sidelines and to directly confront our autocratic behavior, then we have the potential makings of, literally, a third world war, with the U.S. on one side, and the rest of the world on the other. And in this one, we would not be on the side of the angels.

mischief
Feb 23, 2005, 01:57 PM
Over fourteen years have passed since that unhappy day when the German people, blinded by promises made by those at home and abroad, forgot the highest values of our past, of the Reich, of its honor and its freedom, and thereby lost everything. Since those days of treason, the Almighty has withdrawn his blessing from our nation. Discord and hatred have moved in. Filled with the deepest distress, millions of the best German men and women from all walks of life see the unity of the nation disintegrating in a welter of egotistical political opinions, economic interests, and ideological conflicts.

As so often in our history, Germany, since the day the revolution broke out, presents a picture of heartbreaking disunity. We did not receive the equality and fraternity which was promised us; instead we lost our freedom. The breakdown of the unity of mind and will of our nation at home was followed by the collapse of its political position abroad.

We have a burning conviction that the German people in 1914 went into the great battle without any thought of personal guilt and weighed down only by the burden of having to defend the Reich from attack, to defend the freedom and material existence of the German people. In the appalling fate that has dogged us since November 1918 we see the consequence of our inward collapse. But the rest of the world is no less shaken by great crises. The historical balance of power, which at one time contributed not a little to the understanding of the necessity for solidarity among the nations, with all the economic advantages resulting therefrom, has been destroyed.

The delusion that some are the conquerors and others the conquered destroys the trust between nations and thereby also destroys the world economy. But the misery of our people is terrible! The starving industrial proletariat have become unemployed in their millions, while the whole middle and artisan class have been made paupers. If the German farmer is also involved in this collapse we shall be faced with a catastrophe of vast proportions. For in that case, there will collapse not only a Reich, but also a 2000-year-old inheritance of the highest works of human culture and civilization.

All around us are symptoms portending this breakdown. With an unparalleled effort of will and of brute force the Communist method of madness is trying as a last resort to poison and undermine an inwardly shaken and uprooted nation. They seek to drive it towards an epoch which would correspond even less to the promises of the Communist speakers of today than did the epoch now drawing to a close to the promises of the same emissaries in November 1918.

Starting with the family, and including all notions of honor and loyalty, nation and fatherland, culture and economy, even the eternal foundations of our morals and our faith - nothing is spared by this negative, totally destructive ideology. Fourteen years of Marxism have undermined Germany. One year of Bolshevism would destroy German. The richer and most beautiful areas of world civilization would be transformed into chaos and a heap of ruins. Even the misery of the past decade and a half could not be compared with the affliction of a Europe in whose heart the red flag of destruction had been planted. The thousands of injured, the countless dead which this battle has already cost Germany may stand as a presage of the disaster.

In these hours of overwhelming concern for the existence and the future of the German nation, the venerable World War leader [Hindenburg] appealed to us men of the nationalist parties and associations to fight under him again as once we did at the front, but now loyally united for the salvation of the Reich at home. The revered President of the Reich having with such generosity joined hands with us in a common pledge, we nationalist leaders would vow before God, our conscience and our people that we shall doggedly and with determination fulfil the mission entrusted to us as the National Government.

It is an appalling inheritance which we are taking over.

The task before us is the most difficult which has faced German statesmen in living memory. But we all have unbounded confidence, for we believe in our nation and in its eternal values. Farmers, workers, and the middle class must unite to contribute the bricks wherewith to build the new Reich.

The National Government will therefore regard it as its first and supreme task to restore to the German people unity of mind and will. It will preserve and defend the foundations on which the strength of our nation rests. It will take under its firm protection Christianity as the basis of our morality, and the family as the nucleus of our nation and our state. Standing above estates and classes, it will bring back to our people the consciousness of its racial and political unity and the obligations arising therefrom. It wishes to base the education of German youth on respect for our great past and pride in our old traditions. It will therefore declare merciless war on spiritual, political and cultural nihilism. Germany must not and will not sink into Communist anarchy.

In place of our turbulent instincts, it will make national discipline govern our life. In the process it will take into account all the institutions which are the true safeguards of the strength and power of our nation.

The National Government will carry out the great task of reorganizing our national economy with two big Four-Year Plans:

The similarities to Bush's first-term speeches whein the word "marxism" above becomes the word "Liberal" today is chilling and striking. The rest of that PR piece can be found here. (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/newgovt.html)

blackfox
Feb 23, 2005, 02:20 PM
The similarities to Bush's first-term speeches whein the word "marxism" above becomes the word "Liberal" today is chilling and striking. The rest of that PR piece can be found here. (http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/newgovt.html)Granted. Still, there is no guarantee that the ends will be as similar as the means. In other words, great propagandizing they both may be, but there is no guarantee that the aims are equateable, other than the pursuit of power.

mischief
Feb 23, 2005, 02:47 PM
Granted. Still, there is no guarantee that the ends will be as similar as the means. In other words, great propagandizing they both may be, but there is no guarantee that the aims are equateable, other than the pursuit of power.

Touche.

This country has more built-in safeguards than Germany ever did.

However history has shown that a properly "prepared" populace can be convinced an atrocity will only effect their neighbor.... never they themselves... they'll support monsterous acts as "pre-emptive defense" and "for the good of the Nation". This was the essence of the 3rd reich's success and has been the pattern followed by the Neocons.