Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Intel Aggressively Dropping Power Consumption in Future Notebook Processors

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,441
30,642






During Intel's annual investor relations event earlier this week, Intel outlined a fundamental shift in its future processor designs that will likely impact Apple's future notebooks.
Until now, the bulk of Intel's notebook chips are design to draw around 35 watts of power--many of its notebook parts are lower, and some are higher, but 35 watts is the center point for Intel's portable lines. Going forward, however, the new center point will be in the 10 to 15 watt range.
Click to expand...
Intel's future roadmap for notebook processors will now target a much lower power draw then present chips. That means ultra-low voltage processors like those found in the MacBook Air will become the norm instead of a specialty product.




Intel seems to be clearly feeling the pressure of the growing smartphone and tablet market, According to the Financial Times, Otellini describes a future of PCs evolving into "higher performance mainstream-priced, touch-enabled device that would not compromise on features such as thinness, instant-on capabilities, permanent internet connectivity and all-day battery life." Apple's notebook line will certainly benefit from these advances.

Intel and Apple have had a close relationship since Apple switched over to Intel's processors several years ago. Apple has frequently been the first computer manufacturer to ship the latest Intel technologies. In a Reuters report yesterday, Intel said they work very closely with Apple and that Apple even influences their roadmap:
"We work very closely with them and we're constantly looking down the road at what we can be doing relative to future products. I'd go as far as to say Apple helps shape our roadmap," Kilroy said.
Click to expand...


Article Link: Intel Aggressively Dropping Power Consumption in Future Notebook Processors
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2011/05/19/intel-lowering-power-consumption-of-future-notebook-processors/
kinless

kinless

macrumors regular
Apr 2, 2003
189
285
Tustin, California
I just hope the entire line isn't dumbed down... some of us still need the higher-end processors for intensive work.

That said, I wouldn't mind having a low-power machine as a secondary on the go (no, not a phone or tablet).
 
Kalach

Kalach

macrumors member
Jan 11, 2011
79
0
kinless said:
I just hope the entire line isn't dumbed down... some of us still need the higher-end processors for intensive work.

That said, I wouldn't mind having a low-power machine as a secondary on the go (no, not a phone or tablet).
Click to expand...

You read my mind! :)
 
Jimmy James

Jimmy James

macrumors 603
Oct 26, 2008
5,488
4,067
Magicland
Agree with post #3. I use a laptop hooked up to peripherals as a primary computer. It's the best of both worlds for me.
 
B

BigMac2

macrumors newbie
Jul 31, 2002
15
0
FUD...

Mobile ARM CPU is more in 0.5-1 watts range... I think everyone at Intel are scrambling there plan facing the rocket fast rise of ARM cpu. For sure ARM are not powerfull as the x86 chip, but ARM cpu are within 10x mark more efficient than Intel CPU.

I think Intel plan to put x86 into mobile phone and tablet are unrealistic face to ARM cpu. Any efficiency gain Intel could get on x86 cpu by reducing the fabrication process, ARM will do even better with the same trick.
 
F

Fogmeister

macrumors newbie
May 19, 2011
2
0
So what's the bet that Apple exploit this by making thinner devices with thinner batteries with the same battery life rather than using the same devices/batteries to get the "all day" power that they probably will now allow.

Will be very good to see a fully featured tablet device though. The love child of an iPad and a MacBook Air?
 
Lesser Evets

Lesser Evets

macrumors 68040
Jan 7, 2006
3,527
1,294
As usual. A push for innovation sets more people squarely within a pool of fresh urine. Because, as we know, technology has been going backwards for decades now.

kinless said:
I just hope the entire line isn't dumbed down... some of us still need the higher-end processors for intensive work.

That said, I wouldn't mind having a low-power machine as a secondary on the go (no, not a phone or tablet).
Click to expand...

See?
 
NT1440

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
14,610
20,752
This is great news! Its about time mobile really meant mobile, not 4-7 hours from a power source.
 
K

KPOM

macrumors P6
Oct 23, 2010
18,023
7,867
My guess is that all the rumors about Apple and ARM were just saber-rattling by Apple to get Intel to commit to more ULV processors. Intel is clearly feeling the heat from ARM and their inability to get decent performance out of Atom.
 
toddybody

toddybody

Guest
May 13, 2010
1,421
6
On Mars, thinking about my father...
Fantastic News. Glad to see their roadmap is focused on such principles.

nVidia (Kepler, Maxwell) and AMD are also making incredible assertions about the GFLOPS/watt efficiencies in their next two generations of GPUs.

Even if battery tech increases slowly, the culmination of these things will mean some great products for us consumers :)
 
A

apparatchik

macrumors 6502a
Mar 6, 2008
843
2,612
LegendKillerUK said:
For me as a student who lives in two places during a week, this is also my setup. Small and portable with some grunt. :p
Click to expand...

This is also my setup, I do full web development on a 13" air hooked-up to a 27"ACD, whenever I need to work on site, make a presentation, or just to watch a movie on the bed, I just unplug the comp.

Without all the issues that come with a main and secondary computer setup, plus the added cost, I think a lot of people dream would be to have a 15" pro graphic and cpu power on an airs package... dont know if this intel move would reduce actual power between laptops and desktops... in recent years the opposite trend has been the case
 
ciTiger

ciTiger

macrumors 6502a
Jan 25, 2011
626
0
Portugal (Porto)
YES! This is already coming late... But hey better late than never... It Intel wants to compete better with ARM it will need to go this way! Hoping to see the new chips on MBA and MBP asap! :D

Now these are good news!
 
Hellhammer

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
We will still see 35W and 45W mobile CPUs though. Reducing the power consumption means slower performance and not everyone is ready to sacrifice performance for better battery life and stuff. For an average user, even a 10W Atom is sufficient so widening the lineup of low-voltage CPU sounds reasonable.

To be honest, I wouldn't mind a low-power MBA with +10 hours of battery.
 
*LTD*

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
kinless said:
I just hope the entire line isn't dumbed down... some of us still need the higher-end processors for intensive work.

That said, I wouldn't mind having a low-power machine as a secondary on the go (no, not a phone or tablet).
Click to expand...

There will come a time (sooner than you think) when all that intensive work will *not* demand a so-called "higher-end" processor, or (and more likely), that those high-end processors will require a fraction of the power they require today. Looking it what the iPad 2 is capable of today, it's pretty astounding.
 
toddybody

toddybody

Guest
May 13, 2010
1,421
6
On Mars, thinking about my father...
Hellhammer said:
We will still see 35W and 45W mobile CPUs though. Reducing the power consumption means slower performance and not everyone is ready to sacrifice performance for better battery life and stuff. For an average user, even a 10W Atom is sufficient though.
Click to expand...

Could this "shift in design" partially reflect the "3D" re-architecture of transistors? Not to be naive in assuming that they will have their cake and eat it too...but I dont think this lower consumption will always result in performance below current LV/ULV chips.

Im hoping this will be a general evolution in efficiency (current performance at lower TDPs)
 
S

Shanpdx

macrumors 68030
Sep 24, 2008
2,534
346
Blazer town!
Intel is the one who set higher prices for Low Voltage and Ultra Low Voltage CPUs ...

now because of iPad and Smart phones success (ARM) they are forced to bring down the power consumption as well as price

remember the 65 watts Quad Core CPU (similar to the ones in iMac) used to cost premium price than the 95watts last year compared to now
 
Last edited:
Hellhammer

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
*LTD* said:
There will come a time (sooner than you think) when all that intensive work will *not* demand a so-called "higher-end" processor, or (and more likely), that those high-end processors will require a fraction of the power they require today. Looking it what the iPad 2 is capable of today, it's pretty astounding.
Click to expand...

The power consumption has actually gone up. With Pentium 4s for instance, the maximum TDP was 115W and the CPUs we have now have maximum TDP of 130W. iPad is nothing else but a brick when it comes intensive tasks such as true video editing (i.e. more than cut&paste that you can do with iMovie) and 3D rendering.

You won't see high performance CPUs that require only a fraction of power anytime soon. There is, and will always be, a market for the fastest CPUs, even if it means more heat and higher power draw.

toddybody said:
Could this "shift in design" partially reflect the "3D" re-architecture of transistors? Not to be naive in assuming that they will have their cake and eat it too...but I dont think this lower consumption will always result in performance below current LV/ULV chips.

Im hoping this will be a general evolution in efficiency (current performance at lower TDPs)
Click to expand...

The Tri-Gate will transistors definitely help. I didn't mean that lowering the TDP would cause the CPUs to be slower than their predecessors ;) What it can cause, however, is that the performance upgrade will be smaller than what it would have been if the TDPs stayed the same.

Most likely, Intel's approach will take some time so this doesn't mean that Ivy Bridge mobile CPUs will all be 10-15W. Like I said, Intel will probably offer more lineup for different usages. High-performance laptops with higher TDP and then mainstream laptops with less CPU power but longer battery life etc. Quite similar to what we have now but might be that the TDPs of all CPUs will come down (e.g. 15W for mainstream, 25W performance etc).

shanmugam said:
remember the current 65 watts Quad Core CPU (similar to the ones in iMac) used to cost premium price than the 95watts last year compared to now
Click to expand...

LV CPUs still cost a nice premium over the SV chips.
 
Last edited:
toddybody

toddybody

Guest
May 13, 2010
1,421
6
On Mars, thinking about my father...
*LTD* said:
There will come a time (sooner than you think) when all that intensive work will *not* demand a so-called "higher-end" processor
Click to expand...

Sorry, but this seems like a huge contradiction.

If there exists "intensive work", that is considered more processing intensive than other applications, wouldnt it then require a higher echelon of processors as opposed to less powerful solutions?

Are you saying that bottom end processors of the future will totally overkill the ever evolving complex and intensive applications of the time...seems like rubbish to me.

The only way your comment would be close to accurate, is if software development stands still. :rolleyes:
 
azentropy

azentropy

macrumors 601
Jul 19, 2002
4,019
5,372
Surprise
toddybody said:
nVidia (Kepler, Maxwell) and AMD are also making incredible assertions about the GFLOPS/watt efficiencies in their next two generations of GPUs.
Click to expand...

Lets hope so. The power and cooling requirements for even midrange desktop cards is pretty ridiculous.
 
S

Shanpdx

macrumors 68030
Sep 24, 2008
2,534
346
Blazer town!
Hellhammer said:
LV CPUs still cost a nice premium over the SV chips.
Click to expand...

yeah, that is going to change based on Intel statement, $300 and above price for LV/ULV CPUs are not going to cut for $600 - $800 laptop range.

I think other than MBA no other lines up sells well with LV/ULV CPUs - i may be wrong here...

What i referring was the desktop Quad Core 65 watts CPUs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom