RandomDeadHead said:
Actually they didn't have the right to refuse. It's true that if you are purchasing something they can refuse you method of payment, however for debt payment anything goes. And thats just what it was, he had already recieved the service, he was just there to repay his debt when the episode happened. It says it right there on every bill "this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private"
Actually the judges have come down on the creditors side in this, loose pennies while legal tender can be refused. Because you are placing an unfair burden on the creditor.
Same with large amounts of cash, place an IRS burden on the creditor while placing them in a security bind for handling a large amounts of cash that they may not be able to handle.
Some creditors refuse ALL forms of cash -- if the cashier at the probation department clearly posts "NO CASH or CHECKS" -- you best not try pulling a "this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" stunt by telling the judge at your probation revocation hearing that you no longer owe the money because they refused your money.
57 $2 bills is the normal method of payment for this guy, if it's all he had it's not an undue burden for the creditor, since most likely Best Buy would have gladly taken $1 or $5 bills for a $50-$100 purchase.
If was the sequential numbers of the crisp new bills that raised a counterfeit flag, since very few people rarely carry around any significant numbers of new bills.
---
These days you win a "this note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" battle when you offer somebody $500 cash, refused, $500 check, refused, and get sued for much more.
Sort of like the treatment Ugly Duckling customers faced.
Of course if they say that you showed up banging on the doors with the payment when the doors were locked and the register closed both times, and they present a video to prove it... it would sort of create a problem for you.