I don't see anything wrong with it. What am I missing?
I don't see anything wrong with it. What am I missing?
i admit it doesn't sound right but aren't you supposed to always us "an" before a word that begins with a vowel?
I admit it doesn't sound right but aren't you supposed to always us "an" before a word that begins with a vowel?
Anyone noticed this typo in OS X Lion?!
It's grammatically correct. Placing an "an" before a vowel is correct by modern language standards. Doesn't sound good when spoken, but it's textbook. Probably the work of autospell or grammar checker in MS Word.
Given the thread title I find it a bit humorous that this is a thread criticizing grammar.
not true (although i am referring to uk english here)
its grammatically correct to place "an" before a vowel if the vowel word has the vowel sound at the start
an apple (you pronoune the a for apple)
a unified (you pronounce it more of a y younified so if becomes a instead of an)
This is exactly what I believe - and I don't think American English is any different. I don't think Yanks say "Look! An UFO!"
Just because people say it wrong dons't make them mean the same thing.I just put that there to partly cover myself incase of differences
just like the saying
could care less
couldn't care less
in uk english they have different meanings, in US they seem to mean the same thing
Just because people say it wrong dons't make them mean the same thing.
can care is not the same as can NOT care.
Image
It is actually correct, since there is a "j".
unify - /ˈjuːnɪfʌɪ/
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/unify