PDA

View Full Version : Bush administration eliminating 19-year-old international terrorism report




zimv20
Apr 16, 2005, 11:16 AM
link (http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/11407689.htm)


WASHINGTON - The State Department decided to stop publishing an annual report on international terrorism after the government's top terrorism center concluded that there were more terrorist attacks in 2004 than in any year since 1985, the first year the publication covered.

Several U.S. officials defended the abrupt decision, saying the methodology the National Counterterrorism Center used to generate statistics for the report may have been faulty, such as the inclusion of incidents that may not have been terrorism.

Last year, the number of incidents in 2003 was undercounted, forcing a revision of the report, "Patterns of Global Terrorism."

But other current and former officials charged that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's office ordered "Patterns of Global Terrorism" eliminated several weeks ago because the 2004 statistics raised disturbing questions about the Bush's administration's frequent claims of progress in the war against terrorism.

"Instead of dealing with the facts and dealing with them in an intelligent fashion, they try to hide their facts from the American public," charged Larry C. Johnson, a former CIA analyst and State Department terrorism expert who first disclosed the decision to eliminate the report in The Counterterrorism Blog, an online journal.


According to Johnson and U.S. intelligence officials familiar with the issue, statistics that the National Counterterrorism Center provided to the State Department reported 625 "significant" terrorist attacks in 2004.

That compared with 175 such incidents in 2003, the highest number in two decades.

The statistics didn't include attacks on American troops in Iraq, which President Bush as recently as Tuesday called "a central front in the war on terror."

The intelligence officials requested anonymity because the information is classified and because, they said, they feared White House retribution. Johnson declined to say how he obtained the figures.



vwcruisn
Apr 16, 2005, 02:22 PM
wow thats really scary.

Thomas Veil
Apr 16, 2005, 02:51 PM
Typical. If the report doesn't support your pre-ordained conclusions, the data must be wrong.

pseudobrit
Apr 17, 2005, 09:05 AM
inclusion of incidents that may not have been terrorism.

Sounds like the Patriot Act.

Just when you think it couldn't get any deeper -- it's like a neverending ocean of irony!

Sayhey
Apr 17, 2005, 10:39 AM
It's really more important that we feel safer from terrorism, than actually be safer in the WOT, right? These facts just get in the way of a policy we know must be right .... right? :eek:

Dont Hurt Me
Apr 17, 2005, 10:52 AM
Police state spin, i saw the otherday how after billions poored into airport security the performance was no better at stopping stuff getting through then before. Spin,Spin.Spin

IJ Reilly
Apr 17, 2005, 12:12 PM
The "best part:"

The senior State Department official said a report on global terrorism would be sent this year to lawmakers and made available to the public in place of "Patterns of Global Terrorism," but that it wouldn't contain statistical data.

He said that decision was taken because the State Department believed that the National Counterterrorism Center "is now the authoritative government agency for the analysis of global terrorism. We believe that the NCTC should compile and publish the relevant data on that subject."

He didn't answer questions about whether the data would be made available to the public, saying, "We will be consulting (with Congress) ... on who should publish and in what form."

Another U.S. official said Rice's office was leery of the methodology the National Counterterrorism Center used to generate the data for 2004, believing that analysts anxious to avoid a repetition of last year's undercount included incidents that may not have been terrorist attacks.

But the U.S. intelligence officials said Rice's office decided to eliminate "Patterns of Global Terrorism" when the counterterrorism center declined to use alternative methodology that would have reported fewer significant attacks.

The officials said they interpreted Rice's action as an attempt to avoid releasing statistics that would contradict the administration's claims that it's winning the war against terrorism.

Translation: We will be giving Congress less information, and the public, quite possibly none at all.

skunk
Apr 17, 2005, 12:20 PM
Is this what is meant by "greater transparency"?

mischief
Apr 18, 2005, 11:06 AM
Is this what is meant by "greater transparency"?

No. This is what's meant by "Better inter-agency co-operation in an effort to streamline the process."

IE: It's calcification of power in the Executive above and beyond Constitutional mandate.

IJ Reilly
Apr 18, 2005, 11:10 AM
Is this what is meant by "greater transparency"?

Utter opaqueness, Minister.