PDA

View Full Version : Apple Still Interested in InterDigital's Patent Portfolio




MacRumors
Aug 17, 2011, 11:49 AM
http://images.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/17/apple-still-interested-in-interdigitals-patent-portfolio/)


Last month, it was reported (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/07/20/apple-and-google-bidding-for-wireless-patent-house-interdigital/) that Apple and Google were considering bidding to acquire mobile technology firm InterDigital, primarily for the firm's portfolio of over 8,800 patents and 9,700 pending patent applications. InterDigital had decided to explore potential strategic moves for itself, including potential sale of the company, and the company had drawn significant interest due to the current landscape of patent disputes in the mobile industry.

http://images.macrumors.com/article-new/2011/08/interdigital_logo.jpg


With Google on Monday announcing its intent to acquire Motorola Mobility (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/15/google-supercharging-android-with-acquisition-of-motorola-mobility/), a move which will add 17,000 patents and another 7,500 pending patent applications to Google's portfolio, InterDigital's stock dropped 20% due to Google presumably dropping out of the bidding and general fears that the patent arms race might subside as the major players fill out their portfolios to keep each other at bay.

But Reuters reports (http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/17/interdigital-idUSWEN733620110817) that Apple is indeed still interested in InterDigital, and is considering making a bid to acquire the company. Other firms said to be interested in InterDigital include Nokia and Qualcomm.Apple Inc (AAPL.O), Nokia (NOK1V.HE) and Qualcomm Inc (QCOM.O) are among several telecom and technology companies weighing bids for InterDigital Inc (IDCC.O), which specializes in wireless communications technologies, sources familiar with the situation said.

InterDigital is up for sale and is forging ahead with its auction despite a setback on Monday when Google Inc (GOOG.O), one of the key potential bidders, struck another deal.The report notes that Google has not formally withdrawn from the InterDigital auction, although it is unclear whether it will participate in the bidding after committing $12.5 billion to the Motorola Mobility purchase.

Article Link: Apple Still Interested in InterDigital's Patent Portfolio (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/08/17/apple-still-interested-in-interdigitals-patent-portfolio/)



Ulf1103
Aug 17, 2011, 11:53 AM
If Apple buys it, would that be any good for future Apple products?
Or would it only be bad for on-Apple products?

nutjob
Aug 17, 2011, 12:09 PM
If Apple buys it, would that be any good for future Apple products?
Or would it only be bad for on-Apple products?

They are buying up patents so they can sue competitors instead of competing against them with better products so I'd say it would be negative for product development.

Jibbajabba
Aug 17, 2011, 12:15 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

More suing ammunition - yay :-/

nutjob
Aug 17, 2011, 12:17 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-gb) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

More suing ammunition - yay :-/

Wow. You actually welcome Apple spending money on law suits instead of products?

nagromme
Aug 17, 2011, 12:21 PM
Apple is the most-sued tech company. They didnít invent the game. Can they decide not to play? No, they canít.

The Beatles
Aug 17, 2011, 12:28 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Do you not see his emoticon? It was sarcastic.

Torrijos
Aug 17, 2011, 12:30 PM
They are buying up patents so they can sue competitors instead of competing against them with better products so I'd say it would be negative for product development.

Because Apple has never developed and released new products that have then been copied cheaply by others reducing their chances to benefit from their innovations resulting from their investments on R&D.

Is there a term for beerGoogles in the techno world yet?

Ulf1103
Aug 17, 2011, 12:31 PM
They are buying up patents so they can sue competitors instead of competing against them with better products so I'd say it would be negative for product development.

Yes, but if Apple don't buy it, and Google does, Google will probably use it against Apple right? Or not? :confused:

Jibbajabba
Aug 17, 2011, 12:55 PM
Wow. You actually welcome Apple spending money on law suits instead of products?

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)

Do you not see his emoticon? It was sarcastic.

^^ that ;)

nwcs
Aug 17, 2011, 01:15 PM
They are buying up patents so they can sue competitors instead of competing against them with better products so I'd say it would be negative for product development.

Are you an Apple lawyer? I doubt you know all the reasons why they want them. The question I have is why wouldn't they want them?

TMay
Aug 17, 2011, 01:29 PM
And that makes Oracle and MS chuckle. Samsung looks with envy.

Apple or MS will buy this just so Google will go all crazy and throw another $12B on a bad investment.

You know, like Motorola.

Desperation.

It's what happens when a Company doesn't have a strategic plan for the future other than "more advertising please".

nutjob
Aug 17, 2011, 02:10 PM
Yes, but if Apple don't buy it, and Google does, Google will probably use it against Apple right? Or not? :confused:

Apple has a track record of suing others for patent infringement to reduce competition, Google doesn't.

Brad L
Aug 17, 2011, 02:27 PM
Damn, I sold this stock about 6 years ago :(

rdowns
Aug 17, 2011, 02:31 PM
Apple has a track record of suing others for patent infringement to reduce competition, Google doesn't.


So Apple is wrong because they are playing the game and defending their patents?

Google doesn't have many patents for their Android business. Instead, they use their windfall profits in search/advertising to try and crush other companies businesses as they try to find alternate revenue streams.

Torrijos
Aug 17, 2011, 04:02 PM
Apple has a track record of suing others for patent infringement to reduce competition, Google doesn't.

Really? :D
To reduce competition... :eek:

It has nothing to do with Apple defending innovations they brought to consumers after years of R&D, that, the then moribund company, spent lot of cash on.

This is actually what patents were created for...
So companies would invest in R&D to improve the current state of technology, then release new products that others companies (you know the ones that were trying to sell you 80x80 monochromes phones a couple of years ago, or the ones that felt that a blackberry "open source" clone was the future of mobile phones) would end up copying. Patents forcing them to license the patented innovations so the company that did the hard work (:apple:) could reap what they sowed.