Safari 2.0 compared to 1.3??

It thinks I'm running 1.3 which is pretty weird. I get a score of 28.82 seconds for all the tests on an 800MHz G4.

1.585 seconds.

Did it again and got 23 seconds. Is this thing accurate? It seems a bit iffy to me, especially since it can't add up to 2.0.

17.62 seconds here using Safari 2.0 on the computer in my signature.

Wouldn't the test be based on the speed of your computer?

I ran this test, got 16.96 seconds for my 12" iBook 1.2 GHz
What really impressed me was the PB user who got ~1.5 seconds.
I, for one, want to see how PMs and iMacs stack up.

using ff 1.0.4 i got about 30sec with my proc speed and os set accurately but when i said i had a 4ghz machine running windows xp i got 24 sec
edit: emac 1.25ghz, but on most of teh tests it wasn't 100%cpu

I got 11.6 seconds in Safari 2.0 on a 12" 1.33Ghz PB.

Tried it 4 times, twice with Airtunes running and got 35 and 36 seconds, then without Airtunes running and got 29 and 27 seconds.

iBook G4@800MHz with 640 MB RAM, running 10.4 and Safari 2.0 (after an A&I from 10.3.9)

I got 9.35 secs, using safari 2.0 with a 1.33GHz G4 PB with 1.5GB ram.

However it says that I'm using Safari 1.3. Weird as there is a group for Tiger.

Apparently Mozilla 1.8 and Opera 8.0 got the fastest results.

21.8 sec with PB 677 MHz, Safari 2.0

I suspect this site's statistics may be a bit off given it isn't grouping browsers correctly. To be honest, I was running other stuff while I did the test too (as I don't recall seeing a warning for that).

10.98 seconds on Safari 2 on a 1.8Ghz G5.