Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacNut

macrumors Core
Original poster
Jan 4, 2002
22,995
9,973
CT
It's hard to believe that only last week we were getting excited for Russia's first interplanetary mission in 15 years to launch. By now, we should be happy in the knowledge that the ambitious -- and awesome -- mission is powering through space, toward the Martian moon Phobos.

The reality is that we are now discussing uncontrolled reentry scenarios.

As if that wasn't enough bad news, we are looking at an uncontrolled toxic reentry scenario. Phobos-Grunt -- correctly written "Fobos-Grunt," meaning "Phobos-Soil" or "Phobos-Ground" -- is fully-laden with unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide; that's ten tons of fuel and oxidizer. The probe itself weighs-in at only three tons.

The majority of the fuel will likely vaporize during reentry, but everyone will be hoping for a splash-down in an ocean (which covers two-thirds of Earth, fortunately), as the wreckage will still be hazardous. There's also a small quantity of radioactive cobalt-57 in one of the science missions housed in the probe -- a fact that will most likely cause a media frenzy.

It is for these reasons that the Russian media is dubbing Phobos-Grunt "Most toxic falling satellite ever."

(NOTE: At time of writing, there is no official word from the Russian space agency about the Phobos-Grunt situation.)

Though Russian mission controllers are frantically trying to regain control of the craft, it's not looking good. Today's efforts are widely regarded as a last-ditch attempt to salvage the mission. Other space agencies such as NASA and ESA have offered to assist, but it's looking like the probe is quickly becoming unrecoverable.

"Last night there were several attempts to obtain telemetry information from the unit. All of them ended with a zero result. The probability of saving the (probe) is very, very small," an anonymous industry source told Interfax (translated from Russian).

Since Phobos-Grunt was placed in low-Earth orbit (LEO) on Tuesday, and the probe successfully separated from its booster rocket, its attached cruise stage rocket has yet to light up, providing a critical two burns to blast the probe away from Earth to begin its planned 10-month journey to the Red Planet.

It is unknown whether there's a software error or hardware glitch, but attempts to upload new commands to the on board computers have so far failed to change the situation. Phobos-Grunt's batteries are draining and its orbit is degrading. It looks as if the probe will reenter later this month/early December. NORAD is putting a Nov. 26 reentry date on Phobos-Grunt.

And guess what? This will be the third large piece of space junk to reenter in an uncontrolled manner this year. In September, NASA's 6-ton UARS atmospheric satellite burned-up over the Pacific. In October, the German 2.4-ton ROSAT X-ray space mission reentered over the Bay of Bengal. Could November be the third consecutive reentry month?

Like UARS and ROSAT, the likely Phobos-Grunt reentry will be uncontrolled and at the mercy of a highly dynamic upper atmosphere. Also, the probe's orbit takes it between the latitudes 51.4 degrees North to 51.4 degrees South -- most of the world's population lives within that zone, and Phobos-Grunt could come down anywhere. Despite the fact that pieces of the probe will hit the ground, it is still extremely unlikely it will cause death and destruction, however.
http://news.discovery.com/space/rea...hobos-grunt-reentry-111111.html#mkcpgn=fbsci1
 

wgnoyes

macrumors 6502
Jul 20, 2011
287
33
Well, the wreckage will sink as will the cobalt-57, which certainly won't be the first space-intended radioactive material to end up at the bottom of the ocean warming a few fish. It's not well known, but the nuclear power plant that was intended to power the scientific experiments on the lunar surface for Apollo 13 ended up at the bottom of the pacific as well when the LM/lifeboat re-entered and burned up on (I believe) April 19th after "towing" the crippled CM with the crew all the way back from the moon.

The Russians just don't seem to have any luck with Mars, do they?
 

snberk103

macrumors 603
Oct 22, 2007
5,503
91
An Island in the Salish Sea
Duck!

Seriously - falls into the ocean. Not great news, but - worse things have happened. It would be better if we could stop dumping our space junk into the seas, though.

But - we got lucky with the last two satellites - though I suppose it would be accurate to say "We didn't get unlucky" with them. The probabilities were that they would fall into the ocean, but that was just a probability. There was always the chance that those satellites, like this one, could fall across a land-mass.

A Russian satellite smeared itself across the Canadian Arctic several decades ago - took several years to collect as much of the radioactive bits as could be found. Imagine if this satellite smeared itself across Europe, or Southern California, or....

Could happen... lets hope not.

Sleep tight....;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.