I almost completely agree with you. But that OP didn't ask is what he wanted to do was ethical.
On a side note - Apple and him entered an agreement that he can return the exact same product for a complete refund for 15 days.
Which is why I didn't respond to the OP's post. I was responding to the person who raised the ethics issue in the 1st place. The agreement the OP has with Apple is that they have the right to return a product bought from Apple - not an Apple product bought from Amazon - which is how I read the 1st post. OP buys from Apple, then buys from Amazon, and now wants to return the Amazon product using the Apple receipt from the product still in use.
Ironically, if the OP took the
Apple product back (after buying the Amazon product) - I wouldn't have a problem with that. Apple has built the cost of these kinds of returns into the price we pay - and they know a certain number are going to come back - because of the 15 day return policy. [This is assuming that Apple will take it back.]
I know it
seems that what the OP wants to do
appears to be the same thing as returning the Apple bought charger, but it's not. Just change the scenario. A politician takes home taxpayer bought office equipment for a week and uses it for personal gain. He/She then brings back to the office the exact same product (but bought somewhere else for cheaper). Starts to smell a little fishy now, eh?
All I'm saying that is that we need to hold the corporate executives and politicians to the
same ethical standards that we demand of each other.