As was stated earlier, having recently acquired Macromedia, Adobe now owns both GoLive and Dreamweaver. However, Adobe has traditionally not been very kind to acquired apps. I don't see much of a future for Dreamweaver. You do understand that GoLive and Dreamweaver are not your only choices. Before finalizing on two expensive commercial apps, you ought to take a look at opensource offerings. Mozilla's Nvu deserves a look.yklxcq said:i am going to build my own website, which one should i use?
Any comment is appreciate🙂
cheers
dornoforpyros said:dreamweaver period.
go live is JUNK in my opion. <font color="#666666">b</font><font color="#666666">ecause</font><font color="#666666">it does things</font><font color="#666666">like this</font>
granted if the person doing pages like that was an idiot but I still spent hours fixing it.
zim said:I use Dreamweaver at home and just plain old textEdit on the road (DW eats up my battery power fasts!). Not that I want to defend GoLive BUT... I tried the new CS2 version out just for kicks, knowing I was going to delete it from my system but thought I should give it a try seeing how it was part of what I had paid for. Getting to the point, goLive no longer does that junk. In fact, goLive is a bit more advanced then DW right now when it comes to authoring in CSS (at least from my brief observation).
Alao... there are a lot of other builders out there, some free and equally as good to Dreamweaver.
Les Kern said:I prefer GoLive, but only because I began on that app. That being said, I use Dreamweaver to make custom pages for PowerSchool, as recommended. Cleaner code by a longshot. I hope and pray that Adobe takes the two apps and combines them into one SUPERAPP.... clean code like Dreamweaver, great GUI like GoLive.
bigandy said:dreamweaver or textedit 🙄