PDA

View Full Version : Do you think the S3 mini is meant to directly compete with the iPhone 5?




tymaster50
Oct 11, 2012, 01:37 PM
I mean some features Samsung and it's fanbase were making fun of apple for not having is 4g, bigger screen, less ram, smaller memory. Now the s3 mini has no 4g, smaller screen (same as new iPhone) about same ram as iphone, 8,16 gb with removable storage up to 32 (mid price iPhone). It could always be Samsung trying something new. And I'm well aware the iPhone has 4g now.
So do you think makers like HTC are going to make more 4in devices now?



BoxerGT2.5
Oct 11, 2012, 01:44 PM
No, it's to capture a demographic that feel the Android phones have gotten too large. Something for everyone if you will.

daveathall
Oct 11, 2012, 02:04 PM
No, it's to capture a demographic that feel the Android phones have gotten too large. Something for everyone if you will.

Agreed.

onthecouchagain
Oct 11, 2012, 02:18 PM
It's a mid-range device meant to compete against the 4S, if anything, and against HTC One S, the RAZR M, the Lumia 820, HTC 8S, and all those other mid-rangers.

F123D
Oct 11, 2012, 03:28 PM
4", 4.8", 5.5"

Looks like its meant to give options for people who prefer different screen sizes.

LIVEFRMNYC
Oct 11, 2012, 03:34 PM
It's just to capitalize on the GS3 name.

ChazUK
Oct 11, 2012, 03:34 PM
The mid range does not compete with the high end.

Samsung are taking the name of a highly popular device and using the recognition of that product to sell another handset. A bit naughty IMO considering they different classes of handset but that's Samsung's prerogative .

MacRumorUser
Oct 11, 2012, 03:51 PM
I just wish "high end" specs and 4" could co-exist in the same device on Android.

Would really have loved to swap my One X for a S3 Mini if it matched its brothers specs in everything but screen size.

They are trading on the success of the main SGS3 undoubtably, with the S3 Mini. More a marketing opportunity to push middling range hardware on the masses on the back of the success of its brother, than a direct competitor to the iPhone 5.

----------

The mid range does not compete with the high end.

Samsung are taking the name of a highly popular device and using the recognition of that product to sell another handset. A bit naughty IMO considering they different classes of handset but that's Samsung's prerogative .

Yep that's how I see it. I can see a lot of phone shops pushing this handset onto people who think the SGS3 is too big for them, but thinking they are actually getting the same phone albeit smaller screen (because it shares same name & branding) when in fact they certainly are not.

No, it's to capture a demographic that feel the Android phones have gotten too large. Something for everyone if you will.

Something for everyone, as long as you don't want a real SGS3 in a 4" shell. :(

Six8
Oct 11, 2012, 03:54 PM
No 4g = fail

Rodimus Prime
Oct 11, 2012, 04:01 PM
No, it's to capture a demographic that feel the Android phones have gotten too large. Something for everyone if you will.

That is it exactly. Samsung has had a lot of 4" android devices.

LostSoul80
Oct 11, 2012, 04:04 PM
It's just to capitalize on the GS3 name.

Most defenitely. High price only for decent specs.

b24pgg
Oct 11, 2012, 04:29 PM
Are any U.S. carriers actually carrying this device? With so many downgrades in specs, I can't imagine it would do well here. I know VZW won't carry it since they only offer smartphones with 4G now.

AustinIllini
Oct 11, 2012, 04:41 PM
No 4g = fail

Agreed. This seems like a huge misstep by Samsung. Get a GSIII 100% of the time.

xuselppa
Oct 11, 2012, 05:07 PM
This phone isn't coming to the US. Look at the frequencies it will be using. It is pointless to even bother comparing the 2. The iphone 5 is better, but the S3 mini will sell more in the developing world as a cheaper phone with mid range specs.

onthecouchagain
Oct 11, 2012, 05:39 PM
No 4g = fail

It's to be released in Europe.

irDigital0l
Oct 11, 2012, 06:10 PM
It doesnt stand a chance...

If I go Android...Im go big.

I know this is for lower markets but its really pathetic.

cynics
Oct 11, 2012, 06:38 PM
If the US gets a version it will have to have LTE.

I don't like the fact they are using the S3 name on it. Aside from that it fits in well with what Samsung has always been doing, a high device and the mid and low.

Samsungs business model is and always will be to flood the market. A lot of manufactures do this, apple is the big name anomaly with only one device per category. They make it work though. They did an amazing job with the iPad and very well with the MacBook but I just wish they'd step up the iMac so I could justify buying one.

Jessica Lares
Oct 11, 2012, 06:45 PM
I want one in pebble blue. :) It's for smaller markets, people who want the new look, but want it in a pre-paid format, or just cheap.

Evoken
Oct 11, 2012, 08:04 PM
I don't like the fact they are using the S3 name on it.

Same here, they should have given it a different name. This just dilutes the S3 brand.

Dmaynard83
Oct 12, 2012, 10:46 PM
It's to be released in Europe.

The iPhone 5 is to be released in Europe as well and it DOES have LTE

MacRumorUser
Oct 12, 2012, 10:56 PM
The iPhone 5 is to be released in Europe as well and it DOES have LTE

And starts at 679 as opposed to 399

Big difference....

nba1341
Oct 12, 2012, 11:42 PM
No if that was the case it would be a gs3 in 4 inch form.

Wrathwitch
Oct 13, 2012, 07:29 AM
This phone isn't coming to the US. Look at the frequencies it will be using. It is pointless to even bother comparing the 2. The iphone 5 is better, but the S3 mini will sell more in the developing world as a cheaper phone with mid range specs.

Exactly what this guy just said.

Dmaynard83
Oct 13, 2012, 12:09 PM
Exactly what this guy just said.

The mini needs to be distanced from the galaxy s3 as much as possible, its not even close to what S3 is. This is marketing's way of trying to get a buck out of the Galaxy name.

Why couldn't Samsung do what Apple did in shrinking the device and making it better?

I guess they will have to resort to creating semi tablet/phones to get higher power.

Rogifan
Oct 13, 2012, 01:53 PM
Is Samsung trying to create a record on the number of SKU's they have? At least HTC is getting smart and reducing the number phone models they have. Too bad they're struggling. Same with Nokia. Would be nice if one or both of them provided Samsung some competition in the Android/Windows space.

zbarvian
Oct 14, 2012, 08:32 AM
I think people need to understand that no other company could've made the iPhone 5 or something similar to compete...it's way beyond Samsung's engineering skills.

lazard
Oct 14, 2012, 01:33 PM
I think people need to understand that no other company could've made the iPhone 5 or something similar to compete...it's way beyond Samsung's engineering skills.

Or the fact that Samsung designs their phones to cater to the local markets (Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, etc) and they prefer larger phones.

iosuser
Oct 14, 2012, 03:51 PM
I think Samsung should not have named it a Galaxy S-anything. The Galaxy S name should be reserved for their flagship phone. I was excited about this mini until I saw the specs, namely the 480x800 entry level resolution screen. They just diluted their flagship line.