PDA

View Full Version : Woman fired for protecting grandchild from Katrina




Thomas Veil
Sep 15, 2005, 12:19 PM
Well, here's a trip into the stone-cold heart of corporate America:

KANSAS CITY, Missouri (AP) -- When forced to decide between caring for her 18-month-old granddaughter while the child's parents were stranded in New Orleans or showing up for her job, Barbara Roberts chose to be a grandmother.

And for that, she says, she was fired.

Roberts, 54, had driven 200 miles from her home in Mount Vernon to Columbia on August 27, the Saturday before Hurricane Katrina came ashore, to care for granddaughter Trisana for a couple of days. Her daughter, Tina Roberts, and son-in-law, Chris Hardin, were in New Orleans.

It was supposed to be a weekend business trip for the couple, and Roberts, who had used up her allotted time off in her assembly line job at Positronic Industries, had planned to be back to work on Monday. Her daughter had even arranged for another baby sitter to spend Sunday night with Trisana so Roberts could get home in time.

But when her son-in-law tried to schedule the flight home on the afternoon of August 27, he was told all flights had been canceled because of the approaching hurricane.

"There was a Category 5 hurricane with a bull's-eye on our butts, so we called Barb and said we didn't know when we would be coming home," said Hardin, a professor at the University of Missouri School of Medicine. "We truly didn't know what would happen down there."

With no other relatives in the area to take care of the child, Roberts said she had no choice but to call work on August 29, the day the hurricane hit, and tell her boss that she would be missing a few days.

"There was no decision to make -- it was already made," Roberts said. "My daughter could have died down there. This was family. You don't walk out on a child -- especially my grandbaby."

Hardin and his wife spent several days locked down in a hotel -- safe from the chaos that befell most of New Orleans after the levees broke -- and finally made it back to Columbia on Thursday, September 1. Shaken up, they asked Roberts to stay one more day.

She says she was told on the phone that she was going to be fired. And on September 6, she was.

"All I know for sure is that I had missed so many hours, and then this came up," Roberts said. "Usually you have a certain amount of vacation time, and I had used it up. You're also allowed so many unpaid days off, and I'd used them up, too. Fact is, I missed the allotted time and I got fired."

In response to questions about Roberts' termination, Positronic Industries President John Gentry said the company had made cash donations to relief efforts for Hurricane Katrina victims, but he declined to talk about Roberts. The company manufactures electrical connectors.

Hardin said his mother-in-law's firing was "absolutely unethical."

"People speak of family values, and I don't see what's a more central family value than a grandmother stepping up in this sort of situation," he said.

"I sit here trying to imagine what kind of world it would be if grandmothers didn't make that decision."Yeah, but at least Positronic made cash donations to hurricane relief. Kinda gives you a warm, fuzzy feeling all over, doesn't it?

Linque (http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/09/15/katrina.grandmother.ap/index.html?section=cnn_us)



wrxguy
Sep 15, 2005, 12:26 PM
That is ****ing unbelievable...im disgusted...

jelloshotsrule
Sep 15, 2005, 12:41 PM
guys come on. get real. this corporation has a duty to its shareholders to make money and nothing more. **** employees!

mpw
Sep 15, 2005, 12:57 PM
She forewarned her employer she wouldn't be available to work, one assumes she informed them why and for how long.

I would imagine that the employer would have a duty to at least forewarn her that they would have to let her go if she choose this course of action.

If they didn't I think she need to find an employment lawyer, if they did she should've already found both a lawyer and a PR agent. Either way she's going to get paid!

zimv20
Sep 15, 2005, 01:24 PM
what the company did was crappy (they should rehire her under extenuating circumstances). however, the company was well w/in its legal rights and doesn't owe her anything. most employment is at-will, meaning the company can fire an employee at any time for any (non-discriminatory) reason. missing work is such a reason.

dunno is barb was under contract or not, if so that makes it a little more tricky. however, even if she was, i'm making a guess that she violated the terms of that contract by missing days she didn't have to burn. again, the company would be under its legal right to fire her.

morally, i think they're in the wrong, but legally, i think they're okay.

mactastic
Sep 15, 2005, 01:43 PM
Yep. The only way she's getting anything from the corporate folks is to shame them into it. But even so, I think I'd be looking to move on if my employer was that strict and the excuse was that good.

I'd be calling a PR agent and looking for a different place to work.

Sun Baked
Sep 15, 2005, 02:00 PM
"All I know for sure is that I had missed so many hours, and then this came up," Roberts said. "Usually you have a certain amount of vacation time, and I had used it up. You're also allowed so many unpaid days off, and I'd used them up, too. Fact is, I missed the allotted time and I got fired."Basically she knew what would happen if she didn't find a babysitter, or use day care.

tristan
Sep 15, 2005, 04:34 PM
Well, I'm pro-free enterprise but anti-stupidity, and Positronic is just being stupid. Let the negative PR fly! All because they didn't want to give one grandmother a few days off to deal with a national crisis and natural disaster.

Don't panic
Sep 15, 2005, 05:35 PM
Well, I'm pro-free enterprise but anti-stupidity, and Positronic is just being stupid. Let the negative PR fly! All because they didn't want to give one grandmother a few days off to deal with a national crisis and natural disaster.

agree.
the negative publicity will cost them n-times more then the lost hours.
they might be legally in the right, but what pettiness.