PDA

View Full Version : Summit failure blamed on US




zimv20
Sep 19, 2005, 01:49 PM
link (http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1572824,00.html)


The failure of last week's United Nations summit to deliver an agreement designed to prevent terrorists acquiring 'weapons of mass destruction' was sabotaged by the US, senior diplomats have told The Observer.

Officials involved in the negotiations have confirmed that the Bush administration's refusal to countenance any form of disarmament blocked attempts to push measures that would prevent regimes seeking to develop a nuclear capability.

It contradicts reports last week that the US had in fact been furious that plans to crack down on nuclear proliferation were stripped out of the final UN document.

However, diplomats speaking on condition of anonymity have revealed it was in fact President Bush who scuppered what the UN believed was a crucial move in helping make the world safer from the risk of terrorists obtaining a nuclear threat.

Sources reveal that the move has heightened further tensions between the Americans and furious UN officials who believe the issue remains the greatest threat to world peace. Kofi Annan, secretary-general of the UN, told world leaders that the decision to drop all references in the final UN text to disarmament was 'inexcusable', saying that 'weapons of mass destruction pose a grave danger to us all'.

Later, President Bush urged leaders to tackle regimes that 'pursue weapons of mass murder'.

The row comes as the US and Britain attempt to have Iran referred to the UN security council if it does not stop uranium enrichment.

One diplomat said the US refused to accept the 'logical premise' that it must engage in disarmament if it does not to want to encourage a 'new nuclear arms race'.

Mark Malloch Brown, Annan's chief of staff, said that that while progress on terror was positive, the fact no agreement had been made on nuclear weapons meant it was 'a hollow achievement'. Brown told The Observer: 'There is always going to be a terrorist who is going to try and use it [a nuclear weapon]'.

He added: 'More countries are bumping against the nuclear weapons ceiling. And at the same time we have a world energy crisis where countries are turning to nuclear energy as an alternative.'



mactastic
Sep 19, 2005, 02:00 PM
What part of 'Do as I say, not as I do' do you not understand?

Thomas Veil
Sep 19, 2005, 02:05 PM
Well, it's pretty much how the neo-cons handle domestic functions, too: screw them up really bad, and then later claim that they obviously don't work.

3rdpath
Sep 19, 2005, 02:11 PM
our weapons are for spreading peace and democracy.

everyone else's are for evil deeds.

IOW's : we kill out of love.

zimv20
Sep 19, 2005, 02:23 PM
IOW's : we kill out of love.
we had to destroy the world in order to save it?

solvs
Sep 19, 2005, 04:27 PM
Summit failure blamed on US
Yeah, that sounds about right.

ham_man
Sep 19, 2005, 06:18 PM
we had to destroy the world in order to save it?
God did. Seemed to work out pretty well...

:rolleyes:

zimv20
Sep 19, 2005, 06:24 PM
God did. Seemed to work out pretty well...

:rolleyes:
:rolleyes: indeed

mactastic
Sep 19, 2005, 08:20 PM
God did. Seemed to work out pretty well...

:rolleyes:
:D

Oh wait, you're serious. Well in that case --
:D :D

solvs
Sep 21, 2005, 02:28 AM
God did. Seemed to work out pretty well...
Is it me, or does anyone else think He's doing it again? Maybe the first time didn't work out so well. Hey, at least there's no rain of fire and rivers of blood.

~loserman~
Sep 21, 2005, 02:36 AM
Is it me, or does anyone else think He's doing it again? Maybe the first time didn't work out so well. Hey, at least there's no rain of fire and rivers of blood.

YET