PDA

View Full Version : Smoking Gun on Manipulation of Iraq Intelligence? 'NY Times' Cites New Document Today




zimv20
Nov 5, 2005, 04:47 PM
link (http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001434737)


NEW YORK Ever since the Democrats briefly closed the U.S. Senate from view earlier this week, to protest alleged Republican foot-dragging in probing Bush administration pre-war manipulation of intelligence, the press has been asking: So what new evidence do the Democrats have in this matter?

Tomorrow, The New York Times starts to answer the question, with reporter Doug Jehl disclosing the contents of a newly declassified memo apparently passed to him by Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

It shows that an al-Qaeda official in American custody was identified as a likely fabricator months before the Bush administration began to use his statements as the foundation for its claims that Iraq trained al-Qaeda members to use biological and chemical weapons, according to this Defense Intelligence Agency document from February 2002.

It declared that it was probable that the prisoner, Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi, "was intentionally misleading the debriefers" in making claims about Iraqi support for al-Qaeda's work with illicit weapons, Jehl reports.

“The document provides the earliest and strongest indication of doubts voiced by American intelligence agencies about Mr. Libi's credibility,” Jehl writes. “Without mentioning him by name, President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Colin L. Powell, then secretary of state, and other administration officials repeatedly cited Mr. Libi's information as ‘credible’ evidence that Iraq was training Al Qaeda members in the use of explosives and illicit weapons.

“Among the first and most prominent assertions was one by Mr. Bush, who said in a major speech in Cincinnati in October 2002 that ‘we've learned that Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb making and poisons and gases.’”
A White House spokeswoman said she had no immediate comment on the D.I.A. report.

“Mr. Libi was not alone among intelligence sources later determined to have been fabricating accounts,” Jehl continues. “Among others, an Iraqi exile whose code name was Curveball was the primary source for what proved to be false information about Iraq and mobile biological weapons labs. And American military officials cultivated ties with Ahmad Chalabi, the head of the Iraqi National Congress, an exile group, who has been accused of feeding the Pentagon misleading information in urging war.”

Libi is in custody, apparently at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where he was sent in 2003.

According to Jehl, Secretary of State Colin Powell relied heavily on Libi for his speech to the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003, saying that he was tracing "the story of a senior terrorist operative telling how Iraq provided training in these weapons to Al Qaeda."

wow.



IJ Reilly
Nov 5, 2005, 04:58 PM
Tick, tick, tick...

Thomas Veil
Nov 5, 2005, 05:08 PM
Heh. You just can't trust anyone named Libi, apparently.

And the picture of the Bush administration's war plan becomes clearer and clearer. The damning evidence is really piling up.

This has finally turned into a major, Watergate-league scandal. Those of you old enough to recall Watergate will remember that when the scandal was at its peak, the White House was literally barraged with new revelations which seemed to come out at least once a week. I'm not sure we've reached that kind of frequency, but you do get the sense that it is all unraveling for them. This is no longer just "disgruntled" former staffers like Paul O'Neill and Richard Clarke.

But the Dems need to keep pushing, as they did in the closed session. They've got to keep the heat on Bush & Cheney.

mactastic
Nov 5, 2005, 07:47 PM
However, I'd just like to point out that the Democrats voted to go to war after seeing the intelligence too! They saw the same intelligence as everyone else and the still voted to 'go to war'.

Oh wait, the intelligence was stovepiped, cherry picked, and knowingly exaggerated before being fed to Congress and the public? Damn... kinda renders that talking point useless.

------------

We were given worst-case assesments of Saddam's arsenal as if they were fact, and we were given best-case scenarios for the invasion and cost figures as if they were conservative estimates. Anyone who dissented was discredited viscously, and/or fired. They let their surrogates call dissenters unpatriotic and treasonous without comment. And they went to war where none needed to occur with no serious plan for anything other than marching into Baghdad and accepting the flowers and candy the populace would bestow upon us. They went to war on a schedule designed to bolster their political stature. And it worked -- until now.

Dont Hurt Me
Nov 5, 2005, 07:55 PM
I see a Congress reeling in some of that executive power in the near future, or at least attempting so.