So how old is Leopard? I mean when was the last update released?
August 2009 - last incremental release, i.e. 10.5.8
March 2012 - Last security update (http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1533?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US) Intel-only
June 2012 - Last update of iTunes, i.e. 10.6.3 and of Airport Utility
Since the end of 2012, Apple no longer develops any software or updates for Leopard or PowerPC.
Ok, so technically, we are running a not so outdated Operating System, right?
All flavors of Linux I installed on my iBook G4 were useless for my work, none of them offered the tools I needed for my job. But hey! at least it has an "updated web browser"
That was a small and exceptional update though. It only cured a specific Java problem. The one you mentioned probably was the last 'real' one.Oh, when I stated the last security update was July 2011, I hadn't even thought about Intel machines.
Good catch.
Are you using the stock Safari browser?My G4 has become barely useful on the internet, even when I use all kinds tricks (like using mobile websites).
Again, the browsers I named above. If you are still using Safari, I can't help you.Why would I want to wait 20 seconds for a page to load when I have machine that loads websites almost instantly?
TenFourFox/Aurorafox, Leopard Webkit, Roccat.PowerPC Macs aren't too safe either.
Very true. Like, in my case putting out newspapers weekly to include ad design, pagination, legals and classifieds using Adobe CS4 and Acrobat 9 Pro.That being said there's a lot of other stuff a computer can do besides surfing the web.
I use Safari, Tenfourfox and Camino (but not Roccat). Only simple websites work well enough for me. I tend to use the mobile version of Facebook (and other complex websites) since the standard websites are simply too slow, especially whilst running other apps or websites at the same time. It would surprise me to see much difference with Roccat.Are you using the stock Safari browser?
If so why? There's Leopard Webkit and there's Aurorafox/TenFourFox. Roccat is also updated frequently. The last two are updated frequently. TenFourFox 22 was just released a few days ago. It's secure.
Again, the browsers I named above. If you are still using Safari, I can't help you.
TenFourFox/Aurorafox, Leopard Webkit, Roccat.
You're making it sound like if you use a PowerPC Mac to access the Internet you are immediately exposing everything about yourself and that anyone can just invade your computer and take over.
That's not the case. And if it's viruses your worried about, Sophos Antivirus which runs on PowerPC Mac and is udated daily. Or ClamX antivirus which also runs on PowerPC.
Leopard also has a firewall.
Very true. Like, in my case putting out newspapers weekly to include ad design, pagination, legals and classifieds using Adobe CS4 and Acrobat 9 Pro.
I go to heavy flashed/java pages while downloading stuff using transmission and listening to spotify... on a powerbook G4, so clearly you are doing something not quite right (like using slow browsers for example)I use Safari, Tenfourfox and Camino (but not Roccat). Only simple websites work well enough for me. I tend to use the mobile version of Facebook (and other complex websites) since the standard websites are simply too slow, especially whilst running other apps or websites at the same time. It would surprise me to see much difference with Roccat.
Yeah, I tend to use my G4 a lot for accessing my pictures and word processing files on my Dropbox, using my printer etc. So I'm definitely not saying the machine is worthless. However the internet got extremely complex; running a video on a website is terribly slow for me, while one the other hand non-HD video's work great in QuickTime.
In my case YouTube barely worked (ultimately I simply removed Flash completely). Now I even find Google Search not working as fluid as it should...I go to heavy flashed/java pages while downloading stuff using transmission and listening to spotify... on a powerbook G4, so clearly you are doing something not quite right (like using slow browsers for example)
Btw, I feel VERY SECURE using webkit 537 and 10.5.8 online
In my case YouTube barely worked (ultimately I simply removed Flash completely). Now I even find Google Search not working as fluid as it should...
Are you using adblock in Safari, by any chance? It is a terrible resource hog, especially on powerpc.
Also I see that the Mac Mini in your signature and my eMac are very close relatives, the main difference being the amount of ram. My machine has always worked very smoothly even when it had 1GB of ram, so I don't think the problem is in the hardware.
As for Youtube, Leopard Webkit (with the advanced teatures enabled) + ClickToPlugin should work well on most video sites. And there are even more efficient ways to watch online videos if you use TenFourFox / AuroraFox + MPlayer.
Security-wise, it's 2 years old.
I couldn't care less. Don't do do anything that I would be concerned about anyone stealing, and the things that require rely on up-to-date software that I use.
Are you using the stock Safari browser?
If so why? There's Leopard Webkit and there's Aurorafox/TenFourFox. Roccat is also updated frequently. The last two are updated frequently. TenFourFox 22 was just released a few days ago. It's secure.
I go to heavy flashed/java pages while downloading stuff using transmission and listening to spotify... on a powerbook G4, so clearly you are doing something not quite right (like using slow browsers for example)
Btw, I feel VERY SECURE using webkit 537 and 10.5.8 online
HTML5 slower than Flash LOL. Flash was never fast.
HTML5 slower than Flash LOL. Flash was never fast.
I more than agree, I even removed the flash plugin on my intel macs. My life is flash free. lol.
I wanted them to be physical and have a real life interaction with real life human beings.
Of course you have the right to prefer flash over html5 it's just.... a little "unusual"Honestly, it isn't just Apple or PowerPC. These stupid HTML5 and Javascript heavy sites look terrible and work poorly on just about everything. If they can't make it work right, why try to do it at all. If nothing else, make Flash based websites - atleast they were fast.
We've seen it happen so much now - GrooveShark, Google Maps, and now even YouTube is trying to head that way too. Actually, their HTML5 video player is moving along okay, but the rest of the site just feels cheap, slow, and unresponsive like so many other HTML5/Javascript hungry sites these days.
::