Do you need wifi? Cause my work wifi blocks apple downloads. I didn't want to wait till I get home.
You can only do OTA updates over wifi. It's been this way since OTA updates were introduced.
Think of how many people will be updating and how many will be doing it at almost the same time and how large the major updates are in size. It's kind of obvious that it wouldn't be a good idea.Stupid cell phone carriers. I hate them.
What's the big deal? Do they really think it will crash the cell towers?
You can only do OTA updates over wifi. It's been this way since OTA updates were introduced.
Not true. The carrier file that includes the settings for each carrier sets a limit on the size of OTA update it will allow. So you can do OTA updates over cellular when the update file is really small.
Think of how many people will be updating and how many will be doing it at almost the same time and how large the major updates are in size. It's kind of obvious that it wouldn't be a good idea.
There were OTA updates that were just 12 MB and still required Wi-Fi.Not true. The carrier file that includes the settings for each carrier sets a limit on the size of OTA update it will allow. So you can do OTA updates over cellular when the update file is really small.
No, this is an Apple restriction. You can update apps over cellular, but iOS software updates must be done over Wifi.
I call B.S. Let the cell phone carriers prove it. I think they just forbid this in the deal they cut with Apple, because they wanted to and cause they could.
I doubt it would do any serious harm or that it would create that much of a spike in cell phone usage.
Where's the scientific evidence that it would cause any harm?
im sure there's evidence that it would create a burden especially for large updates that a lot of people will jump in quickly. Logic alone pretty much supports that.I call B.S. Let the cell phone carriers prove it. I think they just forbid this in the deal they cut with Apple, because they wanted to and cause they could.
I doubt it would do any serious harm or that it would create that much of a spike in cell phone usage.
Where's the scientific evidence that it would cause any harm?
I call B.S. Let the cell phone carriers prove it. I think they just forbid this in the deal they cut with Apple, because they wanted to and cause they could.
I doubt it would do any serious harm or that it would create that much of a spike in cell phone usage.
Where's the scientific evidence that it would cause any harm?
Yeah, if anything this would actually be favorable to the carriers as they would get tons of money from overage charges, despite some complaints. So the whole carrier conspiracy kind of doesn't work out.I think it is also to protect the user.
Imagine how many non technically gifted people have iPhones. Now say, 80% of them have 2GB per month data plans. Now say, they see a software update on their phones, and think, wow this is great! I'm going to update! While they're in their cars or walking around the mall. Now, imagine the backlash when they realize they just burned through 1.5GB of their 2GB data plan in a few minutes..
im sure there's evidence that it would create a burden especially for large updates that a lot of people will jump in quickly. Logic alone pretty much supports that.
Where's the evidence that it wouldn't be an issue?
Why? I doubt it would kill the cell towers.
Do you need wifi? Cause my work wifi blocks apple downloads. I didn't want to wait till I get home.
Got it, so you just think that's the case. Alright.I submit the lack of a need to prove a negative; just like I don't need to prove that there is no god. Those who suggest otherwise, need to prove the affirmative.
There were OTA updates that were just 12 MB and still required Wi-Fi.
Do you need wifi? Cause my work wifi blocks apple downloads. I didn't want to wait till I get home.
I doubt it would do any serious harm or that it would create that much of a spike in cell phone usage.
Where's the scientific evidence that it would cause any harm?