Use it to connect external storage or a Thunderbolt display. I use an SSD in a Thunderbolt adapter for very fast external storage.
Is it faster than using a SSD adapter with USB 3.0 connector?
Is it faster than using a SSD adapter with USB 3.0 connector?
Thanks!
Technically the TB interface is faster than USB3, but in real life, don't know.
TB attached storage too used to be expensive, I haven't kept up with the pricing. But if $ is no object, the TB interface is, technically, the fastest port you can plug things into, AS LONG AS, already mention the adapter whatever can keep up with it.
For most people, the Thunderbolt connector on the MBA will be used to connect it to the Apple Thunderbolt display
Do you really think so? They're very nice, but also very expensive. I'd be willing to bet that most people use the port with non-thunderbolt displays such as HDMI, DVI or even VGA.
Use it to connect external storage or a Thunderbolt display. I use an SSD in a Thunderbolt adapter for very fast external storage.
how is an ssd externally faster via thunderbolt?
the bottleneck is with the ssd not with the cable.
usb3 gets u several gb/s, but the ssd only gets maybe 500mb/s.
What difference would the thunderbolt make?
The OP asked what thunderbolt could be used for, and I provided an example of what I use it for. "Very fast external storage" meaning substantially faster than, say, a 7200 rpm disk.
Technically the TB interface is faster than USB3, but in real life, don't know.
TB attached storage too used to be expensive, I haven't kept up with the pricing. But if $ is no object, the TB interface is, technically, the fastest port you can plug things into, AS LONG AS, already mention the adapter whatever can keep up with it.
how is an ssd externally faster via thunderbolt?
the bottleneck is with the ssd not with the cable.
usb3 gets u several gb/s, but the ssd only gets maybe 500mb/s.
What difference would the thunderbolt make?
how is an ssd externally faster via thunderbolt?
the bottleneck is with the ssd not with the cable.
usb3 gets u several gb/s, but the ssd only gets maybe 500mb/s.
What difference would the thunderbolt make?
I was thinking about this too.
But then i realized that thunderbolt does not make your storage faster.
thunderbolt = cable
7200 rpm = disc
ssd = disc
the cable is fast but the disc is slow. might as well use a cheaper usb cable.
the only real world use for thunderbolt is 4k displays.
Actually, no it isn't.
You're right in a theoretical sense, but I was keeping it simple and within the context of USB 3 and its advertised speed of 5 Gb/s. You'll not achieve 5 Gb/s via USB 3 even if the device is capable of it. You'll not achieve 500 MB/s, even if the device is capable of it. I have edited my post to clarify what I meant.