Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

oneMadRssn

macrumors 603
Original poster
Sep 8, 2011
5,978
13,990
Option 1: Mid 2011 Mac Mini - Sandy Bridge CPU - AMD Radeon HD 6630M
Option 2: Late 2012 Mac Mini - Ive Bridge CPU - Intel HD4000

I plan to use one as an iTunes homeserver and PVR.

Which would transcode from a 1080p MPEG2 video to an iTunes / AppleTV compatible h264 video faster? Which would be able to multitask and do several videos at the same time faster? Is the difference so inappreciably small that it doesn't matter?

I've read all the usual reports and benchmarks comparing them, and it seems the numbers suggest the 2012 model would be slightly faster; but I have my doubts because the same benchmarks suggest that gaming is slightly better on the 2011 model with the AMD GPU. So it seems like a toss up?

Has anyone here actually owned both models and done something similar with them?

----------

For context - I'm hoping to have a setup similar to the one outlined here: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1714136/
 

sonicrobby

macrumors 68020
Apr 24, 2013
2,482
526
New Orleans
Its all about the processor, make sure you get the quad core and not the dual core version. Im sure both will be able to handle about the same if they are both the same #-of-core CPU
 

paulrbeers

macrumors 68040
Dec 17, 2009
3,963
123
I've read all the usual reports and benchmarks comparing them, and it seems the numbers suggest the 2012 model would be slightly faster; but I have my doubts because the same benchmarks suggest that gaming is slightly better on the 2011 model with the AMD GPU. So it seems like a toss up?

Clearly you must be comparing a 2012 Base Model to the 2011 Mid-model (the one with the 6630m). They both have dual cores and would process about the same. However, to do apples to apples comparison of the 2012 mid-model to the 2011 mid-model, the 2012 would have 4 cores and crushes the pure processing power of the 2011. I've owned a 2011 Base (dual core) and the 2012 Mid (quad core) and for transcoding video it is night and day.

Go with the 2012 Mid-model.
 

blanka

macrumors 68000
Jul 30, 2012
1,551
4
Any Mini from 2009 up is an excellent HTPC, that does not need transcoding as it plays everything (MKV, 24p, DTS HDMA). Don't settle for an ATV in between the Mini and your TV! That's like driving your Ferrari around on a trailer.
 

BeatCrazy

macrumors 601
Jul 20, 2011
4,960
4,279
Don't settle for an ATV in between the Mini and your TV! That's like driving your Ferrari around on a trailer.

Except when you have 4 TVs and want to share/access your iTunes content among them. Heck of a lot cheaper than throwing 4 Mac minis behind each TV, not to mention the easy usability of an ATV.
 

blanka

macrumors 68000
Jul 30, 2012
1,551
4
You can also hook up a Raspberry Pi at every TV. Even cheaper, and with excellent iOS controller program, even easier than the crappy AppleTV remote. And what's the point of 4 TV's? I can watch just one.
 

oneMadRssn

macrumors 603
Original poster
Sep 8, 2011
5,978
13,990
Thanks everyone. I foolishly did not consider the fact that quad core would make a difference.

Also, since this would be a host for more than one TV / computer; using the ATV seems like the easiest way to do this.
 

drsox

macrumors 68000
Apr 29, 2011
1,706
201
Xhystos
You can also hook up a Raspberry Pi at every TV. Even cheaper, and with excellent iOS controller program, even easier than the crappy AppleTV remote. And what's the point of 4 TV's? I can watch just one.

Yes, but do you always want to be sitting in the same room ? I have 3 TVs in 3 different rooms for 3 different purposes, each with a media streamer - all running from the same media source in the attic.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.