A fotographer by the name of Rob Galbraith published his comparison of a PC Vs. a Mac in various foto themed tests. The results can be found here http://www.robgalbraith.com/diginews/2003-01/2003_01_07_macpc.html
Wasn't Steve Jobs going on at MWSF about how the PowerBooks were increasingly being regarded (by Apple and by customers) as desktop replacements?Originally posted by MacBandit
Plain and simply you can not compare the AlienWare laptop with any Apple laptop. That's because it is not a laptop but a desktop replacement with a keyboard and screen built into it. It is far from portable when compared to any Apple laptop because it weighs more then twice as much and is much much bigger.
Originally posted by alex_ant
Wasn't Steve Jobs going on at MWSF about how the PowerBooks were increasingly being regarded (by Apple and by customers) as desktop replacements?
Don't PowerBooks have keyboards and screens built into them as well?
The AlienWare laptop does not weigh more than twice as much as the PowerBook (9.6lb vs. 5.4lb) and is thicker and deeper but narrower.
I think the more pathetic thing is that apple still cant beat anyone with even with 2 processors in there machine. sure im with everyone else, i really dont care, i love my mac. but the fact is the prices could be lowered with a single processor which competed. i still think the powermacs are some of the most overly priced computers on the market. for the prices apple charges they should be "giving" us two optical drives in that mac. two cd-roms would all i need, now need for 3 bays like my pc because there is no audigy drive for the mac. i still love my powermac though, wouldnt trade it for anything, and i know that apple cant give away monitors with there computers like other competitors because the build premium and quality monitors which are closely priced with competitors.Originally posted by Kid Red
OH DAMN IT!! The fricking pcs are 6 seconds faster then my dual gig!! Damn it all to hell!!
Ah, whatever, you guys can take that 6 seconds and put it where.....I feel so insignificant because my machine is 6 seconds slower at a few things, booo hooo
Anyone notice that it seems to be fashionable to benchmark againgst macs now? I figure it's 1 of 4 things-
1) They are getting revenge from all the Photoshop bakeoffs from a few years back
2) They want traffic to their web site
3) They know Apple is a little behind and they want to kicks us while we are down
4) Jealousy breeds eny
haha but on the other end when i think of it, nobody can beat apple.Originally posted by jaguarx
iJon - Apple can't beat everyone, not anyone. Remember, Alienware boxes like that are bloody expensive, just because the top of the range PC can beat the top of the range mac by a few seconds doesn't really mean much at all.
Originally posted by alex_ant
The AlienWare laptop does not weigh more than twice as much as the PowerBook (9.6lb vs. 5.4lb) and is thicker and deeper but narrower.
you are so right. I have a powerbook g3 pismo. its like 7 something pounds and is very heavy after a while in my backpack. thats why my mom is buying me a new 12 inch powerbook. Please someone, if you are interrested in a PowerBook g3 with double hard disk space, more than double ram, and some applecare and more left on it, check out my other thread. I neeeeed to sell it, i am taking offers, name your price within reason.https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=17623Originally posted by lmalave
Maybe it's not more than twice as much but that's a HUGE difference. 9.6 lbs is about what my old Dell "desktop replacement" weighed, and it was miserable to carry around. I vowed that I'd go for portability with my next purchase, an I'm very happy with my iBook. Basically, at 10 lbs., this is not a machine that's meant to be taken out of the house. At best, you just move it from desk to desk. At 5 lbs., you are truly mobile. A 5 lb. difference may not sound like much but trust me, your shoulders definitely feel it after a while.
Originally posted by movabi
I'm getting sick of people who blindly follow something and can't take a critical look at a situation. I love my mac, but i'm sure I'll get crap for this.
So, when did mac users start defending technology that is slower? I'd say the pentium is kickin some butt. This makes me sad, but apple is definately lacking in the hardware power area. And with no official announcements on where the hardware is going, its hard to have faith. Sure the mac is stylish but I don't buy equipment for the aesthetics. I use to be proud that the mac use to be faster. That the technology was better. But those days seem to be behind us. Apple claims to innovate... nows the time for them to produce.