New iPod shuffle Partners?

[MacRumors]

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)

Macworld.co.uk (http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?home&NewsID=13756) reports on analyst notes from American Technology Research that SigmaTel may not be used by Apple for an upcoming entry-level iPod.

There has been ongoing speculation that Apple's iPod shuffle will be replaced by a 1GB iPod nano in the future.

[thejadedmonkey]

I think that if this is correct, it would mean that we're getting something other than 1gig nano's

w00t- First post!

[nagromme]

A lower-cost Nano makes sense, but I still think Apple will have something (a Shuffle or replacement) at the VERY low-end, sub-$100, below the Nano.

[BlueRevolution]

I own a Shuffle and have used my friend's iPod Photo, and I do prefer the shuffle. While the Nano has the same "throw it in your pocket and forget about it" form factor, I prefer the durability and ease of use of my Shuffle. it would be nice to be able to rate songs and see titles, but aside from that and price I can't think how it could be improved. I see these rumours as a bit unsettling for that reason, but then again I can't see needing to replace my Shuffle any time soon so I guess I shouldn't care.

and for those who think durability isn't important: I've dropped my Shuffle on hard pavement around half a dozen times, with no appreciable damage to the finish. the thing is built like a tank, and sexy.

[EricNau]

I think the current iPod line-up is great. It covers all areas, $70-$400 and 512mb-60gb.

Maybe Apple will drop the 1gb shuffle and just keep the 512 shuffle and the 1gb Nano.

[Seasought]

The shuffle is just too practical, I'd hate to see it go. However, if the nano-replacment can hold up in terms of being light enough and durable enough (while having more space) I suppose I shouldn't worry.