PDA

View Full Version : It's sad when... (Vanity Fair cover)




MattG
Feb 7, 2006, 03:45 PM
...you read about something in the news and the first thing you think of is someone from MacRumors :rolleyes:

Johansson, Knightley Bare All for Magazine (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060207/ap_en_mo/people_vanity_fair_nudes;_ylt=Ah3YYmQUS48HJQIvjovvN1UnHL8C;_ylu=X3oDMTA3YXYwNDRrBHNlYwM3NjI-)



kwajo.com
Feb 7, 2006, 05:47 PM
LOL! so true :o

Abstract
Feb 7, 2006, 06:28 PM
Johannson probably looks better naked, mind you. :D


*dodges bullet in "bullet time"*

katie ta achoo
Feb 7, 2006, 06:33 PM
Johannson probably looks better naked, mind you. :D


*dodges bullet in "bullet time"*

I agree... Keira's stomach is just kinda weird looking.

But you can't really tell from that 100*300 pixel image. *shrug*

clayj
Feb 7, 2006, 06:34 PM
Hey, I'm a Johanson. I am contractually obligated to like a Johansson over a Knightley. ;)

If only Rachel McAdams hadn't wussed out... then it would ALMOST be perfect. Instead we get to see this Ford guy.

EDIT: Image removed. If someone else wants to host it, let me know.

eva01
Feb 7, 2006, 06:42 PM
If you want to see a big scan of the picture/cover in question, click here (http://www.panthershuddle.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=1845).

Hey, I'm a Johanson. I am contractually obligated to like a Johansson over a Knightley. ;)

If only Rachel McAdams hadn't wussed out... then it would ALMOST be perfect. Instead we get to see this Ford guy.

yay for sending us to a page that makes us register to the forum...:P

Applespider
Feb 7, 2006, 06:47 PM
A week or so ago, I got a shock when I spotted Munkle's tar on the front page of the BBC website...

...was even more shocked when I discovered that it was actually a story about monkeys but for a moment, I wondered what site I was on!

Lord Blackadder
Feb 7, 2006, 08:08 PM
I saw the Vanity Fair cover and immediately thought of MR and that KK thread with around a billion posts from back in the day. :rolleyes:

Counterfit
Feb 7, 2006, 11:17 PM
Sorry ed, but Scarlett is hotter than Keira. :rolleyes:

barneygumble
Feb 7, 2006, 11:29 PM
I think that link should come with a "heavy breathing in here" warning. I wish i was the bloke in the photo, how much did he see??:cool:

Deepdale
Feb 8, 2006, 12:58 AM
I agree... Keira's stomach is just kinda weird looking.

At best it looked like half a normal stomach ... Scarlett wins this one.

TEG
Feb 8, 2006, 01:12 AM
I agree... Keira's stomach is just kinda weird looking.

It is called being fit. Those are muscles, similar to a six pack that guys can get. The way she is sitting makes them fold weirdly though.

Personally I prefer someone with a little skin tone, not bright white.

TEG

mopppish
Feb 8, 2006, 02:06 AM
Holy...freaking...GOD! :eek:
I've been getting the impression lately that these are the kind of girls you can't bring home to mum.
But... so... HOT.

redAPPLE
Feb 8, 2006, 02:11 AM
I think that link should come with a "heavy breathing in here" warning. I wish i was the bloke in the photo, how much did he see??:cool:

all of them goodies.

but that johansson chick looked too pale in that pic. and what's with that dark colored nail color thing (another minus point for the johansson chick).

redAPPLE
Feb 8, 2006, 02:14 AM
Holy...freaking...GOD! :eek:
I've been getting the impression lately that these are the kind of girls you can't bring home to mum.
But... so... HOT.

if i could bring home at least one of them home? who cares about mom? :D

mad jew
Feb 8, 2006, 02:17 AM
Hey, I'm a Johanson. I am contractually obligated to like a Johansson over a Knightley. ;)


Umm... I'm not sure I agree with that mentality... :D

It's illegal in Australia.

Toreador93
Feb 8, 2006, 04:34 AM
...you read about something in the news and the first thing you think of is someone from MacRumors :rolleyes:

Johansson, Knightley Bare All for Magazine (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060207/ap_en_mo/people_vanity_fair_nudes;_ylt=Ah3YYmQUS48HJQIvjovvN1UnHL8C;_ylu=X3oDMTA3YXYwNDRrBHNlYwM3NjI-)

I saw that on yahoo, and yes, I fall under that category too :D

ziwi
Feb 8, 2006, 10:21 AM
Actually the first thing I thought of ws "why is that dude ruining a perfectly good magazine cover" then it went right to threads and avatars over here...

emw
Feb 8, 2006, 10:34 AM
Johannson probably looks better naked, mind you. :D You guys must really be smoking something. Keira is in significantly better physical condition. And is more attractive.

(And, through some miracle of either modern photography or Photoshop, actually appears to have a chest larger than that of a 12-year-old boy.)

BTW, I'm not just saying that to get on the e's good side.

devilot
Feb 8, 2006, 10:42 AM
but that johansson chick looked too pale in that pic. and what's with that dark colored nail color thing (another minus point for the johansson chick).I'm pretty gosh darned sure that none of these were due to personal choice...

And clay, I agree, Rachel McAdams is way way way hotter than either of these two and should have been in there! Oh well, we've all got our limits, right? :p It is called being fit. Those are muscles, similar to a six pack that guys can get.You can be fit without a six pack. Women can have six packs, too. You can have a six pack and still be unhealthy. As in, unhealthy heart strain, etc. etc.

Deepdale
Feb 8, 2006, 10:53 AM
You can be fit without a six pack.

I am an example of that principle. Even with a 50 pound weight loss that I have managed to successfully keep off for 18 months now, I am a trim 150 but not even close to having a two pack, let alone a six pack.

dcv
Feb 8, 2006, 10:56 AM
(And, through some miracle of either modern photography or Photoshop, actually appears to have a chest larger than that of a 12-year-old boy.)

BTW, I'm not just saying that to get on the e's good side.

I noticed that too! hehe, you sure?

gekko513
Feb 8, 2006, 12:27 PM
I was about to post a new thread on this, but I'm glad to announce that I passed the noob test and found this thread by searching for 'Vanity Fair'.

Count me in as one of those whose primary association with this picture was macrumors and one of our dear moderators.

emw
Feb 8, 2006, 12:32 PM
I noticed that too! hehe, you sure?Yeah, it's hard to miss.

She's so hot. I can't imagine how anyone in their right mind could possibly think she's not the best looking woman on that cover.Okay, maybe now I am... :D

miloblithe
Feb 8, 2006, 12:45 PM
Why do people argue about which superstar is hotter than some other superstar? Obviously, these are all very attractive people, and different people are attracted to different things (and thank goodness for that).

emw
Feb 8, 2006, 01:18 PM
Why do people argue about which superstar is hotter than some other superstar?Can't answer that question in general, but in this specific case it's because a certain MR moderator has a (presumably unrequited) crush on one of the stars in question. ;)

Lyle
Feb 8, 2006, 01:28 PM
I wish I was the bloke in the photo, how much did he see??:cool:I doubt that the bloke in the photo was all that interested in seeing these women naked. They aren't really his type.

vniow
Feb 8, 2006, 01:33 PM
Actually the first thing I thought of ws "why is that dude ruining a perfectly good magazine cover" then it went right to threads and avatars over here...

No kidding, I looked at the pic, saw the guy with his hairy chest as was like eeew.

Girls were hot though, if a little thin for my tastes...

xPismo
Feb 8, 2006, 01:42 PM
Yeah, it's hard to miss.

She's so hot. I can't imagine how anyone in their right mind could possibly think she's not the best looking woman on that cover.Okay, maybe now I am... :D

What? The OP was talking about the magic of Photoshop done on Keira and her boyish body. Then you say she is 'teh hotz'? :confused: I'm lost.

I vote SJ.

P.S. you can see more of Kiera nekked in 'The Jacket' with Adrian Brody. Mmm....

emw
Feb 8, 2006, 02:09 PM
What? The OP was talking about the magic of Photoshop done on Keira and her boyish body. Then you say she is 'teh hotz'? :confused: I'm lost. Well, since I was the OP in regards to your comment, I have full rights to alter my position at any time, just like I normally do with Keira.

That being said, the fact that I felt KK was artificially enhanced somewhat does not mean that I thought she wasn't hot. Besides, all this was in a now-exposed effort to ingratiate myself to one of our KK-obsessed mods. :p

vniow
Feb 8, 2006, 02:13 PM
I have full rights to alter my position at any time, just like I normally do with Keira.


I suppose just one would get boring after awhile....

Black&Tan
Feb 8, 2006, 02:19 PM
Another vote for Scarlett.

What is this infatuation Hollywood has with the "much too thin" look? And the blond hair? Keira looked MUCH better in Pirates!

macartistkel
Feb 8, 2006, 02:21 PM
Yes, I saw the whole Entertainment Tonight Special on this cover shoot....keira and scarlett got to become better friends after posing nude together it seemed!

And my pick of who is more attractive is definitely Scarlett! And speaking of her, I wanted to see Match Point so bad and the movie NEVER came to this town! I heard she does a phenomanial performance in it!

Oh and more comment to add about the Vanity Fair Hollywood issue....Jennifer Aniston in nothing but the black leather boots pic is better looking than Angelina's scary tub pic!

Doctor Q
Feb 8, 2006, 03:46 PM
Why do people argue about which superstar is hotter than some other superstar?Thread cross reference.

Lord Blackadder
Feb 8, 2006, 03:52 PM
Time for a poll!!! :D

mad jew
Feb 8, 2006, 03:53 PM
It's spelled pole. Oh, right... :o

MattG
Feb 8, 2006, 04:56 PM
I'd be all over Scarlett like Oprah on a ham sammich.

digitdean
Feb 8, 2006, 08:14 PM
I think it's really sad when you notice that the aforementioned Vanity Fair has a Peter Biskind article before you notice the two mack chicas on the cover.
Worse is when you'd buy the aforementioned Vanity Fair for the Peter Biskind article before you would for the two mack chicas on the cover.
I am guilty on both counts.

yoda13
Feb 9, 2006, 12:17 AM
another vote for KK on here. I think she is hot:D The other one isn't bad either, but not as hot as KK:p

mgargan1
Feb 12, 2006, 12:20 AM
This one's for you edesignuk, and any other guy. It was on elliot in the morning.

This is the cover of Vanity Fair

Abstract
Feb 12, 2006, 12:33 AM
If you searched for "Bony looking girl with the body of a little boy," you certainly would have found all the Keira threads. :p

2nyRiggz
Feb 12, 2006, 12:40 AM
They don't look very nice now do they but the dude looks like he is enjoying himself:)

Bless

Glen Quagmire
Feb 12, 2006, 06:21 AM
The "dude" is gay, so I doubt if he was that interested in all the naked flesh around him.

Another vote for Scarlett. KK is just too thin.

devilot
Feb 12, 2006, 10:56 AM
If you searched for "Bony looking girl with the body of a little boy," you certainly would have found all the Keira threads. :pHAHA. Heh. heh. You's funny. :D I'm not kidding. I agree w/ your statement.

revenuee
Feb 12, 2006, 11:09 AM
Holy...freaking...GOD! :eek:
I've been getting the impression lately that these are the kind of girls you can't bring home to mum.
But... so... HOT.

I love the girls you shouldn't bring home mom

MacRy
Feb 12, 2006, 02:52 PM
So does anyone have a larger version of the pic so we can all have a look and judge?

Chaszmyr
Feb 12, 2006, 02:54 PM
I think Keira and Scarlett are both hot, but I don't think this picture is particularly flattering to either of them.

Deepdale
Feb 12, 2006, 02:56 PM
If you searched for "Bony looking girl with the body of a little boy," you certainly would have found all the Keira threads. :p

I wonder how many times Michael Jackson has entered such a description into his search engine?

solvs
Feb 13, 2006, 12:59 AM
I thought Scarlett was against nudity in films? Guess it's ok when it's in print. :p They're both pretty though, so more power to them, but the photos are way too obviously photoshopped. They don't look anything like that in real life.

Abstract
Feb 13, 2006, 05:06 AM
I wonder how many times Michael Jackson has entered such a description into his search engine?

None, because Michael Jackson would never search for a girl.

mad jew
Feb 13, 2006, 05:11 AM
I wonder how many times Michael Jackson has entered such a description into his search engine?


None, because Michael Jackson would never search for a girl.


Not even for his sister? There's gotta be something going on there... We put the rumours in MacRumors.

Abstract
Feb 13, 2006, 05:30 AM
There is no Latoya Jackson. That's what Michael looks like after he shaves his legs.

mpw
Feb 13, 2006, 05:54 AM
I notice there's been no post in this thread from one particular member one would, a few months ago, expected to have seen. He's dumped the 'tars, locked the thread about them and now seems to not even be interested enough to comment. (or is he not allowed to, girlfriend?, court order?)


:D

TEG
Feb 13, 2006, 01:14 PM
You can be fit without a six pack. Women can have six packs, too. You can have a six pack and still be unhealthy. As in, unhealthy heart strain, etc. etc.

I was just pointing out that the reason her stomach looks weird is because she has some muscle definition there. Also, to me being fit is a look, being healthy is a feeling. Many people in the world are fit, but are far from healthy, I on the other hand am healthy, but not fit.

TEG

russed
Feb 13, 2006, 02:56 PM
mmmm....kiera is soooooooo nice!!!

i have a clalendar of her above my desk. whenever i get bored, look up, there she is to keep me going!

and she is british and my age...... i SO stand a chance!!! :D kiera, if you are reading...

Zigster
Feb 13, 2006, 04:56 PM
in the biz who has sampled the wares of one of the aforementioned girls and found the grotto to be "lacking in constriction".

over and out.