Can't happen soon enough in my opinion.
A good read:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.02/dirge.html
A good read:
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.02/dirge.html
Originally posted by gbojim
Another interesting question is who will pay for album production. The electronics and software to record and master high quality music is fairly cheap these days. Or you can rent a fully equipped studio for about $150 per hour plus engineer. The problem is most acts could not produce their own material if their life depended on it. I have never understood these acts that fly around the world spending 3 days in a different studio for every track at $50k a pop. On the other hand, its pretty easy to burn a couple hundred thousand to get an album out. Someone will have to step up with that money.
Promotion will become another interesting issue. Outside of touring, we have TV specials, videos, radio ads, magazine ads, contests to fly somewhere and meet the band and all the other things people do to get your attention. Most of this promotion though is initiated by the promoter. You do not have to go seek it out. So, if there is less promotion money, there is a bigger chance a good artist will not make it because no one knows who they are. A new model will be required for that as well.
Originally posted by howard
first i have a question...who exactly are the big 5?
Originally posted by howard
i do agree with the last to posts, it doesn't have to be incredibly expensive to engineer your music...but the part that is very expensive is advertising...advertising and production. it costs fortunes to get your name out and also to make the cds and distribute them. Not many artists have that kinda of money and would only be selling a few cds here and there at local areas if it weren't for the record companies. bye the way i'm not trying to back them 100% just giving you the other side of the arguement...cause i know there arn't to many who will
Originally posted by Chomolungma
Your agrument seems to suggest that, you need to be famous so that people know that you are a good musician or band. Shouldn't it be the other way around.
I think word of mouth spread by the very fast internet can be just effective even more so perhaps. It starts in the local bars, clubs and small music events. I know it works, because I listen to many electronic musics produced by not so famous musicians from around the world. Recording music has been around for a few decades, but playing music live to an audience has been around since man learned how to make sounds with tools.
I just don't think the agrument made by the Big 5 i.e. they need to spend millions to get people's attention is strong or can even be seriously considered.
Originally posted by Doctor Q
Caution: I'm just thinking out loud here.
A growing number of people will no longer pay anything like the current prices for prepackaged music, e.g., an audio CD at the record store. People in the music business could try to convince them to change their minds, try to force them to pay for downloaded music, or prevent them from copying it, but those sound to me like losing battles in the long run.
So what alternatives are there, other than lowering the retail prices to the bone? Two off-the-cuff ideas:
(1) They could make prepacked goods more valuable by selling you more than the ...
Originally posted by maka
Musicians get 10% on sales of CDs with big record companies