Yes, there are some alternatives for word processors. But what I have in mind is a radical reshaping of the product.
Let's say, for sake of argument, that WordPerfect really wanted to distinguish themselves in the marketplace. They could customize WP in a number of different flavors:
* WordPerfect legal ... already their #1 market; this version would include specialized legal formatting and templates.
* WordPerfect for writers ... take out a lot of the pointless features for secretaries and add in one-click formatting for novels, screenplays, business writing formats, etc.
* WordPerfect executive ... would be customized for managers and executives, focusing on easy formatting for memos, letters, e-mail, perhaps some PowerPoint compatible features.
Etc., etc ... the idea being that the one-size fits all word processor forces people to adjust to it ... software should suit the purpose of the user. The only important feature of MS Word is its file compatibility.
Make the software available via the web, you can download and add-in new features as you need them. The key would be guaranteeing 100% compatibility with MS Word. If you could convince IT managers that there's absolutely no reason to install bloated MS Office packages on every PC, you could really put some hurt into Microsoft.
It just astounds me that some people will spend thousands of dollars running away from MS, then will install MS Office on OS X. That's surrender, folks. Office is the REAL enemy.