PDA

View Full Version : The New New Gore




zimv20
Mar 22, 2006, 02:17 AM
link (http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=11299)


The New New Gore

Five years ago, Al Gore was the much-mocked pol who blew a gimme with his stiff demeanor and know-it-all style. Today? C’mon, admit it: You like him again.

The most important speech of Al Gore’s post–non-presidency was neither well-covered nor particularly dramatic. He delivered it against a plain blue curtain, and when he finished, the applause rippled but never roared. None in attendance, however, would have dared call it boring.

The address was the keynote for the We Media conference, held at the Associated Press headquarters in New York last October and attended by an audience that included both old media luminaries and new media innovators. In attendance were Tom Curley, president of the AP, Andrew Heyward, president of CBS News, and New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, all leading lights of a media establishment that, five years earlier, had deputized itself judge, jury, and executioner for Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign, spinning each day’s events to portray the stolid, capable vice president as a wild exaggerator, ideological chameleon, and total, unforgivable bore.

They must have been wondering what changed. Over the next 48 minutes, Gore laced into the state of the media, lamenting the “systematic decay of the public forum,” and echoing Walter Lippmann’s belief that the propaganda emanating from the press corps was rendering America’s “dogma of democracy” void. Journalism, Gore said, had grown “dysfunctional,” and now “fails to inform the people.”

The speech wasn’t just an isolated blast aimed at wresting some headlines or settling some scores. Gore has long been quietly obsessed with excising the media from the politician-public relationship. That’s been the unifying aim of all his seemingly disconnected ventures since returning to the public eye: a determination to evade, and eventually end, the media’s stranglehold on political communication. Yet few seem to have noticed this campaign, with most observers too caught up in Gore’s old storylines to recognize his new efforts.

(more)

long, but very interesting read. well worth it.

the word of the decade is 'disintermediation'.



solvs
Mar 23, 2006, 03:43 AM
If only we'd known. My problems with him seem petty now by comparison. Not that I voted for Bush. I didn't vote for anyone. But being in CA at the time, I didn't think it matter. If only more people in FL didn't feel the same way I did.

Agathon
Mar 23, 2006, 12:03 PM
If only we'd known. My problems with him seem petty now by comparison. Not that I voted for Bush. I didn't vote for anyone. But being in CA at the time, I didn't think it matter. If only more people in FL didn't feel the same way I did.

They didn't. Unfortunately, they were black and had names similar to those of convicted felons (names thoughtfully supplied by the repugs).

tristan
Mar 23, 2006, 01:19 PM
I wonder if Gore is setting up a situation where he can run again in 10 or 15 years - build a broad base, platform, etc. I've always liked Gore, except for his wife and that whole "Rap Music is evil" thing.

Mike Teezie
Mar 23, 2006, 02:26 PM
I've always liked Gore, and the more he speaks out, the more I like him.

Hell, I'd vote for him for Pres. (wasn't old enough on the first go 'round)

solvs
Mar 24, 2006, 04:25 AM
They didn't. Unfortunately, they were black and had names similar to those of convicted felons (names thoughtfully supplied by the repugs).
Or they accidently voted for Pat Buchannan. That whole situation stinks of incompetence and/or corruption. Pretty much the same as the Bush administration.

I lived in WA during that whole recount thing in 2004, so I've seen first hand how bad it can be.

asherman13
Mar 24, 2006, 04:54 AM
Perhaps some of the people on here might like Gore because he's on the Board of Directors for Apple?

I must say that that's a reason for me, also the fact that we share a birthday (next Friday). :D