sam10685 said:...do u think they are in the near-future or still a ways off?
Airforce said:iPod Nano is already flash.
CoMpX said:So is the shuffle. There is not the technology yet to use flash for 30GB or higher storage. It simply does not exist yet.
Airforce said:It just hasn't been adopted by the iPods yet.
emaja said:Because it doesn't exist at a price point that would be reasonable for a music player.
Airforce said:iPod Nano is already flash.
sam10685 said:i know. i'm talking about all ipod models.
emaja said:I just found this describing upcoming 8 and 10GB nanos to fill a need for something exciting for the Christmas season.
BlizzardBomb said:8 and 10GB? Who would pay the extra $50 to go from 8 to 10GBs? More likely to be 2, 4 and 6GB for the next revision.
sam10685 said:true. but who would pay the extra $50 these days to go from 2 to 4 gigs? people do.
BlizzardBomb said:8 and 10GB? Who would pay the extra $50 to go from 8 to 10GBs? More likely to be 2, 4 and 6GB for the next revision.
rye9 said:What's the difference between Flash and a HDD?
BlizzardBomb said:That's because most people tend to have about 4 - 8GBs of music.
Felldownthewell said:I would love to see them re-enter the mid-range again, and I am willing to pay for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rye9
What's the difference between Flash and a HDD?
One is solid state, the other has moving parts.