PDA

View Full Version : More CIA spooks watch ABC News than any other network.




Thomas Veil
May 16, 2006, 01:10 AM
...that is, watch and listen in.

Remember when Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstain were being spied on by the feds while they were investigating Watergate? Well...

Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling

May 15, 2006 10:33 AM

Brian Ross and Richard Esposito Report:

A senior federal law enforcement official tells ABC News the government is tracking the phone numbers we (Brian Ross and Richard Esposito) call in an effort to root out confidential sources.

"It's time for you to get some new cell phones, quick," the source told us in an in-person conversation.

ABC News does not know how the government determined who we are calling, or whether our phone records were provided to the government as part of the recently-disclosed NSA collection of domestic phone calls.

Other sources have told us that phone calls and contacts by reporters for ABC News, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, are being examined as part of a widespread CIA leak investigation.

One former official was asked to sign a document stating he was not a confidential source for New York Times reporter James Risen.

Our reports on the CIA's secret prisons in Romania and Poland were known to have upset CIA officials. The CIA asked for an FBI investigation of leaks of classified information following those reports.

People questioned by the FBI about leaks of intelligence information say the CIA was also disturbed by ABC News reports that revealed the use of CIA predator missiles inside Pakistan.

Under Bush Administration guidelines, it is not considered illegal for the government to keep track of numbers dialed by phone customers.

The official who warned ABC News said there was no indication our phones were being tapped so the content of the conversation could be recorded.

A pattern of phone calls from a reporter, however, could provide valuable clues for leak investigators.Well! This certainly solves messy issues like subpoenaing and jailing reporters, doesn't it?

ABC News link (http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/federal_source_.html)



Thomas Veil
May 16, 2006, 01:16 AM
Follow-up:

FBI Acknowledges: Journalists Phone Records are Fair Game

May 15, 2006 7:18 PM

Brian Ross and Richard Esposito Report:

The FBI acknowledged late Monday that it is increasingly seeking reporters' phone records in leak investigations.

"It used to be very hard and complicated to do this, but it no longer is in the Bush administration," said a senior federal official.

The acknowledgement followed our blotter item that ABC News reporters had been warned by a federal source that the government knew who we were calling.

The official said our blotter item was wrong to suggest that ABC News phone calls were being "tracked."

"Think of it more as backtracking," said a senior federal official.

But FBI officials did not deny that phone records of ABC News, the New York Times and the Washington Post had been sought as part of a investigation of leaks at the CIA.

In a statement, the FBI press office said its leak investigations begin with the examination of government phone records.

"The FBI will take logical investigative steps to determine if a criminal act was committed by a government employee by the unauthorized release of classified information," the statement said.

Officials say that means that phone records of reporters will be sought if government records are not sufficient.

Officials say the FBI makes extensive use of a new provision of the Patriot Act which allows agents to seek information with what are called National Security Letters (NSL).

The NSLs are a version of an administrative subpoena and are not signed by a judge. Under the law, a phone company receiving a NSL for phone records must provide them and may not divulge to the customer that the records have been given to the government.Oh, by the way...don't think of this as spying on ABC. Think of this as covert interactive television watching.

ABC News link (http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/05/fbi_acknowledge.html)

solvs
May 17, 2006, 02:39 AM
This can't possibly be legal. Spying on journalists? Didn't we have some things in the Constitution and Bill Of Rights about this stuff?

Boy, this just keeps getting better and better doesn't it. :rolleyes:

emmawu
May 17, 2006, 08:04 PM
They're all afraid of Brian Ross

Thomas Veil
May 18, 2006, 12:36 AM
I'm really surprised this hadn't generated more play in the media and more anger from the public.

There are certain relationships where confidentiality is sacred: priest/confessor, doctor/patient, attorney/client...and reporter/source. That our own government could be undermining the latter is almost obscene. The press -- such as it is -- is our only hope of learning the truth from a government that won't tell us any.

If the government manages to scare all the sources into clamming up, the only news left will be Tony Snow's press handouts and the official progaganda of Fox. :mad:

zimv20
May 18, 2006, 12:49 AM
There are certain relationships where confidentiality is sacred: priest/confessor, doctor/patient, attorney/client...and reporter/source.
and only the first has remained unassailed during the bush administration.

solvs
May 18, 2006, 03:00 AM
and only the first has remained unassailed during the bush administration.
Actually, not them either (http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&hl=en&q=catholics+quakers+NSA&btnG=Google+Search).