jsw said:The black MB's have a matte finish and should hide scratches a bit better. Dunno about the white finish; I assume it's glossy but could be matte as well.
MacRumorUser said:Both will have the same finish. I'm sure Apple have thought about it, mind you the Black Nano still scratches as soon as you look at it....
wilmor42 said:OMG the black looks awesome! initially i thought the new keyboard design looked very 'pc' but up close its sweet!
and the best bit is i can hook it up to the 20" cinema display.. finally some dvi!
thedbp said:LIAR!!!!! If you TAKE CARE OF YOUR iPOD IT WILL NOT GET SCRATCHED. Its as simple as that. My 3rd gen iPod still looks great after 3 years.
Nanos are made out of the same material as any other iPod.
Also, both the MacBooks DON'T have the same finish. White is glossy, black is matte.
You, sir, have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
Not very diplomatic language.thedbp said:LIAR!!!!! If you TAKE CARE OF YOUR iPOD IT WILL NOT GET SCRATCHED. Its as simple as that....
You, sir, have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
skunk said:Not very diplomatic language.
thedbp said:LIAR!!!!! If you TAKE CARE OF YOUR iPOD IT WILL NOT GET SCRATCHED. Its as simple as that. My 3rd gen iPod still looks great after 3 years.
Nanos are made out of the same material as any other iPod.
Also, both the MacBooks DON'T have the same finish. White is glossy, black is matte.
You, sir, have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
other
Quote:
Originally Posted by skunk
Not very diplomatic language.
But on the other hand, it's hilarious.
jsw said:The black MB's have a matte finish and should hide scratches a bit better. Dunno about the white finish; I assume it's glossy but could be matte as well.
Funny/bizarre, maybe. Clearly a man of few but rude words.jsw said:But seriously... am I the only one that thinks this is funny?
jsw said:At first, I was bothered by the post. But then, after looking around, I have to laugh.
Look at his posts. His first (of 16) posts was five years ago. His last post before the one above was two years ago (before I even joined).
He came out of retirement just to post that comment.
I think it's hilarious. Against the rules, yes, and maybe I'll clean it up later. But seriously... am I the only one that thinks this is funny? Not the post, but the back story?
Actually, it's the other way around. The 1-2G iPods used acrylic; later iPods (3G right up through the nano/5G) use polycarbonate, which is harder to break than acrylic.asherman13 said:iPod nano's and 5G iPods use acrylic for their non-chrome front covering, whereas previous iPods used polycarbonate. Acrylic, though it breaks less easily, it scratches easier than polycarbonate.