PDA

View Full Version : AP/Ipsos: Americans want Democrats in power this fall




Thomas Veil
Jul 14, 2006, 10:54 AM
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans are in jeopardy of losing their grip on Congress in November. With less than four months to the midterm elections, the latest Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that Americans by an almost 3-to-1 margin hold the GOP-controlled Congress in low regard and profess a desire to see Democrats wrest control after a dozen years of Republican rule.

Further complicating the GOP outlook to turn things around is a solid percentage of liberals, moderates and even conservatives who say they'll vote Democratic. The party out of power also holds the edge among persuadable voters, a prospect that doesn't bode well for the Republicans.

The election ultimately will be decided in 435 House districts and 33 Senate contests, in which incumbents typically hold the upper hand. But the survey underscored the difficulty Republicans face in trying to persuade a skeptical public to return them to Washington.

The AP-Ipsos poll of 1,000 adults conducted Monday through Wednesday found that President Bush has stopped his political freefall, with his approval rating of 36 percent basically unchanged from last month. Bush received slightly higher marks for his handling of the Iraq war and the fight against terrorism, weeks after his surprise trip to Baghdad and the killing of Iraqi terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi in a U.S. airstrike last month.

But a Democratic takeover of either the House or Senate would be disastrous for the president, leaving both his agenda for the last two years in office and the chairmanship of investigative committees in the hands of the opposition party. To seize control of Congress, the Democrats must displace 15 Republicans from House seats and six Republicans from the Senate.

The AP-Ipsos survey asked 789 registered voters if the election for the House were held today, would they vote for the Democratic or Republican candidate in their district. Democrats were favored 51 percent to 40 percent.

Not surprisingly, 81 percent of self-described liberals said they would vote for the Democrat. Among moderates, though, 56 percent backed a Democrat in their district and almost a quarter of conservatives — 24 percent — said they will vote Democratic.

Democrats also held the advantage among persuadable voters — those who are undecided or wouldn't say whom they prefer. A total of 51 percent said they were leaning Democrat, while 41 percent were leaning Republican.

"We still have wind in our face. It's a midterm election in the president's second term," said Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y., chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee. "Today is a little bit better in the atmospherics of Washington than it was maybe a month ago."

The president's party historically has lost seats in the sixth year of his service. Franklin D. Roosevelt lost 72 House seats in 1938; Dwight D. Eisenhower 48 in 1958. The exception was Bill Clinton in 1998.

By another comparison, polls in 1994 — when a Republican tidal wave swept Democrats from power — the two parties were in a dead heat in July on the question of whom voters preferred in their district.

"It comes down to a fairly simply question: Can Democrats nationalize all the elections? If Republicans prevent that, they have a shot. If they don't, they lose," said Doug Gross, the GOP gubernatorial candidate in Iowa in 2002 and the state finance director for the 2004 Bush-Cheney campaign.

Overall, only 27 percent approved of the way Congress is doing its job. Lawmakers get favorable marks from 36 percent of conservatives, 28 percent of moderates and 17 percent of liberals.

Some criticism of Congress has focused on lawmakers' inability to control spending, with lawmakers tucking in special projects for their home districts.

"They used to say there's nothing worse than a tax-and-spend liberal Democrat," said Gary Wilson, 51, a self-described liberal from Gaithersburg, Md. "There is something worse: It's a borrow-and-spend Republican. This is going to come back to haunt us."

One bright spot for the GOP is that Republicans hold an advantage over Democrats on issues such as foreign policy and fighting terrorism — 43 percent to 33 percent — and a smaller edge on handling Iraq — 36 percent to 32 percent.

The AP-Ipsos poll was conducted after the divisive Democratic debate in the Senate over setting a timetable for withdrawing U.S. forces from Iraq. Potential voters were paying attention to the GOP complaint that Democrats want to "cut and run."

"It seems like the Democrats want to pull out or start to pull out, and I don't think that's the correct thing to do," said Eric Bean, 24, a college minister in Fort Worth, Texas. "I'd much rather see a Congress that would support our president. I think George Bush is doing the best he can. I think Republicans will support him."

John Dendahl, the Republican candidate for governor in New Mexico, said Democrats, with the help of some Republicans, have been successful at obstructing legislation in Congress while heaping the blame on the GOP.

Tom Courtney, a Democratic state senator in Iowa, said U.S. voters are ready to trust his party to lead.

"I honestly think it's ours to lose," Courtney said. "My experience, we're not above that. Americans are ready for change."

The poll of adults had a margin of error of 3 percentage points and the survey of registered voters had a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.Chicago Tribune link (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-republicans-ap-poll,1,6788621.story?coll=chi-news-hed)

I hate to be the eternal pessimist, and I'd love to be proven wrong, but I don't feel quite so cocky as this article implies that I should. Yeah, the Dems hold an 11% "electability" lead, but is that just what the voters are telling the polls? When push comes to shove, will they vote for the same old incumbents again? And second, I fear the Republicans will pull some kind of ************ issue out of their hat again, as they did with gay marriage amendments in 2004. I know they've failed to do that with immigration and flag burning, but Karl Rove still has time between now and November to come up with something else.



Dont Hurt Me
Jul 14, 2006, 11:38 AM
I know I want the democrats in, Republicans are discraceful and have become the same kind of political scumbags that democrats had grown into only worse. Republicans arent representing the people at all, not a single bit is my take. They are pure corporation puppets to the point they have ignored the Mexican invasion,ignored this presidents lies to get us into Iraq,passed a pathetic Patriot act which they never read, helped the oil companies make billions, outed a CIA agent to spin lies, etc. Im trying to think hard of anything they have done for the american people? Lets see they wanted the UAE to run our ports? wanted to sell a major oil company to the chineese, seems they just arent interested in the American Worker/Taxpayer except at election time.Then trying to give amnesty to millions of mexicans once again, Screw those republican bastards. They have done nothing for this country,nothing but help tear down everything that we were. The American people have been lied to,taken advantage of and raped by this party that worships the dollar,anyones dollar. We have to put our country first,not Iraq,not China,not Mexico,not the rest of the world at the cost of our own souls. Another rant by another "former" republican.

zimv20
Jul 14, 2006, 12:38 PM
i don't give such polls much weight. i'm not convinced that when someone wants the dems to control congress, it's going to translate into a (D) vote in their local election.

no links saved, unfortunately, but i've seen more than a couple times this election season where an unnamed (D) does better against an incumbent (R) than the named (D) does. meaning: while people are favoring dems in general, it doesn't seem they favor many specific dems.

all else being equal (and with diebold and such, it's not), i'm not yet convinced of a democratic takeover this fall.

mactastic
Jul 14, 2006, 01:08 PM
i don't give such polls much weight. i'm not convinced that when someone wants the dems to control congress, it's going to translate into a (D) vote in their local election.

no links saved, unfortunately, but i've seen more than a couple times this election season where an unnamed (D) does better against an incumbent (R) than the named (D) does. meaning: while people are favoring dems in general, it doesn't seem they favor many specific dems.

all else being equal (and with diebold and such, it's not), i'm not yet convinced of a democratic takeover this fall.
So true. Many polls have shown a generic Democrat polling better against a generic Republican, but when names are put in place the Democrat fares much worse.

FFTT
Jul 15, 2006, 12:20 AM
The Democratic party has been trying to build support for gradual withdrawal of troops as an election issue, but now with the sudden escalation of hostilities in the middle east, that playing card may not be effective.

The timing of this seems almost too convenient months before our congressional elections.

Unfortunately, it seems that Israel's actions this week have galvanized opposing Islamic factions against Israel and now we can't leave.

If the situation gets much worse we may have no other choice than to
greatly increase troop strength.

leekohler
Jul 15, 2006, 02:51 AM
The Democratic party has been trying to build support for gradual withdrawal of troops as an election issue, but now with the sudden escalation of hostilities in the middle east, that playing card may not be effective.

The timing of this seems almost too convenient months before our congressional elections.

Unfortunately, it seems that Israel's actions this week have galvanized opposing Islamic factions against Israel and now we can't leave.

If the situation gets much worse we may have no other choice than to
greatly increase troop strength.

You are right but- I think a lot of people are starting to question why we support Israel in the first place-even Republicans. Plus Americans are starting to catch on to this cynical garbage. The GOP can only play the same card for so long.

scem0
Jul 15, 2006, 05:38 AM
Yeah, that article seemed a bit too hopeful, but I'd love to see a Democratic takeover. I too fear that the republicans will raise another ******** issue to draw out votes. I think people are falling for that less and less though, which is good.

e

FFTT
Jul 15, 2006, 09:11 AM
I think many of the problems in our leadership could be resolved with a
Civic Responsibility Act.

In other words, compulsory voting where everyone MUST vote within
a reasonable time frame.

Right now, our current system uses hot button issues to fire up the voters
to show up at the poles.
The turnouts are pitiful and the true feelings of the mainstream voters
are not being represented.

If every citizen HAD to vote, I think we would see many more worthy candidates and far less corruption.

solvs
Jul 16, 2006, 03:49 AM
Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it too. Exit polling showed Kerry should have won. Like most people, I really don't want the neocons in charge anymore with almost all of the other Repubs and even some Dems in tow. But it's not that I necessarily like the Dems. I just really, really hate the neocons and all the damage they are doing. Hopefully the Dems will do less.

If they win.