PDA

View Full Version : Republican Voters Dismayed by Biggest Spending Rise Since 1990




zimv20
Sep 15, 2006, 08:55 PM
bloomberg (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=a5zS1ZWR__O4)


Sept. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Republican voters are angry, not for the first time, at big-spending politicians in Washington. This year, their wrath is aimed at their own party.

The Republican-controlled Congress heads into the Nov. 7 elections having increased federal spending this year by 9 percent -- the most since 1990 -- to about $2.7 trillion, according to projections from the White House Office of Management and Budget. The agency estimates government spending will grow to 20.6 percent of gross domestic product in 2006 from 18.5 percent when President George W. Bush took office in 2001.

``We've strayed a long way from the principles the party was founded upon,'' said Representative Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican.

[...]

Most of the extra discretionary spending, the lawmakers say, went to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, homeland security and the Hurricane Katrina clean-up.

OMB data show that non-security discretionary spending, excluding emergency funding measures, has increased every year since 2002: by 6 percent that year, 5.7 percent the next, 4.3 percent in 2004, and 2.8 percent last year. This year, it is projected to increase by 0.5 percent.

Republican lawmakers say they are confident their constituents will stick with them because the Democrats are even less committed to restraint.

[...]

While government data show the budget deficit will narrow to $296 billion this year, the smallest since 2002, OMB says that is largely because of an unanticipated increase in tax revenue that isn't likely to recur next year. And lawmakers so far haven't made sizable cuts in next year's spending plans.

[...]

Between 1996 and 2001, when Democratic President Bill Clinton was in the White House and Republicans controlled both chambers of Congress, government spending declined from 20.3 percent of gross domestic product to 18.5 percent.

so bush and the GOP congress just undid everything that clinton and the GOP congress did to reduce federal spending.



iGary
Sep 15, 2006, 09:01 PM
We've strayed a long way from the principles the party was founded upon,'' said Representative Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican.

In more ways than one.

This is why I am no longer a registered Republican, but instead an Independent.

leekohler
Sep 16, 2006, 01:00 AM
What I find humorous in all discourse regarding government is the noton that somehow democrats favor big government. In my experience, democrats want the government out of our personal lives. Republicans seem to take more of our money and give it to their pet projects, such as "faith-based" initiatives and so forth. Republicans seem to want our money to go to them because they know best. :rolleyes: They're speaking out of two sides of their mouths.

balamw
Sep 16, 2006, 02:14 AM
They're speaking out of two sides of their mouths.
Unfortunately, this is not a new skill for politicians. :(

B

solvs
Sep 16, 2006, 05:32 AM
What I find humorous in all discourse regarding government is the noton that somehow democrats favor big government.
Sure they do. I mean, they want guns out of the hands of criminals, they want to stop businesses from polluting and make them pay for things like healthcare, they want to give people money just because they're sick, or lose their jobs through no fault of their own, or get too old to work after spending a lifetime giving the government their hard earned money, forcing people to live with equal rights no matter how racist, homophobic, fundamentalist, classist, or whatever they might be. I'm sure there are more. Things like that are obviously government intrusions. Telling gays they can't get married, telling people what they can and can't do with their bodies, invading other countries for reasons that have nothing to do with national security, and trying to force your beliefs down the throats of others is perfectly acceptable. I'm sure I'm forgetting something there too.

Now if only the Liberals could actually be Democrats, or the Neocons could actually be conservative, we could actually have some one to vote for instead of against. To quote Bill Maher, I would be a Republican if only they would, but the same goes for the Dems.

mactastic
Sep 16, 2006, 11:09 AM
so bush and the GOP congress just undid everything that clinton and the GOP congress did to reduce federal spending.
While at the same time campaigning by saying that Democrats will increase government spending.

Scum.

Glen Quagmire
Sep 16, 2006, 12:05 PM
Oh, so the Republican base is finally waking up to the fact that the current bunch in Congress and President Bush are a load of free-spending corporatists?

What next? Will they now realize that their interests aren't really served by voting as they do? They may share a religious outlook and the social conservatism of the GOP, but nothing more. Blue collar workers who vote Republican are voting against their own interests (taxes and the like). But they can't/won't vote Democratic as they don't share the social liberalism of that party. The saying "stuck between a rock and a hard place" comes to mind.

I remember reading about a Republican politican who spouted the typical party line about wanting to reign in the federal government, but was strangely in favour of all the government aid that went to help his constituents (and help him stay in office through their votes) and voted to keep the pork. Odd, that.