Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Sdashiki

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Aug 11, 2005
3,529
11
Behind the lens
Im in the market, again, for a Canon macro lens.

Gotta be FD mount as Im still ol' school and manual.


Two choices that always come up and are pretty much my only two options are:

FD Macro 50mm f/3.5
FD 100mm f/4.0 Macro

The 100mm scares me in that it would, plus the extension tube, be quite long and hard to hold with my hands AND still focus and not shake too much.

is there an advantage id gain from using the 100mm over the 50mm that flowers, bugs and generic nature macro would benefit from?
 

failsafe1

macrumors 6502a
Jul 21, 2003
621
1
The 100 would allow for the benefits you get from a longer lens. You can be close to your subject but have the camera farther away with the 100 than you can with the 50. This is an advantage in nature photography. You also get a shallower depth of field with the longer lens and that helps isolate your small bugs and animals. A tripod is a must even with the 50 so the extra length of the 100 is not a problem on a tripod. Just get a real tripod not one of the junk cheap units that have plastic legs of tapering size and a small diameter telescoping middle section.
 

macgfxdesigner

macrumors regular
Sep 27, 2004
190
0
macro lens

I would recommend the 100mm, focal length is 6 inches and super sharp at 2.8 and up. Great portrait lens too!

about ext tubes, yes they do shorten your focal length but you can only use them in certain focal lengths, meaning you can get close to something but say then you need to shoot something far away, you can't!

I recommend the 100mm macro lens! and its actually 160 mm cause of the 1.6 crop on the camera too
 

failsafe1

macrumors 6502a
Jul 21, 2003
621
1
A FD mount is for older film cameras. No AF here? Unless there is a FD to AF mount for newer cameras?
 

ChrisA

macrumors G5
Jan 5, 2006
12,584
1,700
Redondo Beach, California
The 100mm scares me in that it would, plus the extension tube, be quite long and hard to hold with my hands AND still focus and not shake too much.

You are right, no way can you hand hold a camera if you are doing 1: 1 macro shots. At that level of magnification even 1mm of fore to aft camera shake will change the focus. It does not matter if the lens is 50mm, or 100mm you need a good camera support. Depth of field is measured in millimeters.

Now if you back off and shoot subjects the size of your hand or a 4x5 index card then you have a hope of hand holding. but you really want some kind of support. Even a poor student can afford a zip lock bag filled with beans or pea sized aquarium gravel. bean bags and bricks make decent supports.

the 100mm lens give you more subject to camera distance. some times you need this to avoid casting a shadow on the subject or so you can fit in some kind if lighting or strobe or reflector.

The 60mm lens actually has more camera to subject distance than you might think and is the "standard"
If the 60mm lens were a "simple" one element lens then then it is 120mm from the canera it would be focused on a subject 120mm from the lens and doing a 1:1 magnification ratio.
 

Sdashiki

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Aug 11, 2005
3,529
11
Behind the lens
Sounds like 100mm is the way to go

thanks for all the input.

"here dad, buy me this for xmass. now stop asking what to get me."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.