PDA

View Full Version : A Taliban Spokesman's Confession




zimv20
Jan 17, 2007, 08:47 PM
time (http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1579979,00.html?cnn=yes)


Afghan officials have long accused Pakistan of harboring leading elements of the Taliban. And, they say, the confession of a leading Taliban spokesman arrested in Afghanistan on Monday further bolsters their claim. Abdul Haq, better known as Dr. Hanif, was caught just hours after crossing the border from Pakistan into Afghanistan in Nangahar province. His capture, after he was followed from the border on a tip, was a success for the beleaguered National Defense Services (NDS), Afghanistan's intelligence branch, which has long been unable to prevent suspected Taliban militants from treating the poorly guarded border as a revolving door, entering at will to assist with attacks on Afghan and Coalition forces, then melting back into the sanctuary of Pakistan's ungoverned frontier zone.

Afghan investigators say that under questioning, Dr. Hanif, who had been working with the Taliban for the past 14 months, told them that the organization would never have been able to challenge Afghan military and NATO forces without the direct assistance of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency. "This means that according to his confession, the ISI of Pakistan is directly involved in funding, arming and supporting the Taliban and other opposition groups against the government of Afghanistan," says NDS spokesman Sayed Ansari.

Although the ISI is believed to have played a major role in nurturing the Taliban and bringing it to power in the mid-1990s, Pakistan has routinely denied the accusation that it continues to provide support or a permissive environment for the organization. Just last week, outgoing U.S. National Intelligence Director John Negroponte warned that while Pakistan is "a frontline partner in the war on terror," it is also the country "where the Taliban and al-Qaeda maintain critical sanctuaries." Al-Qaeda, he said, is "cultivating stronger operational connections and relationships that radiate outward from their leaders' secure hideout in Pakistan to affiliates throughout the Middle East, North Africa and Europe."

(more)

that's the most interesting part of the article, imo, about continued ISI involvement with the taleban. after 9/11, i honestly thought pakistan would be the main focus of the response.

instead, we got iraq. supposed to be easier, i guess.



Music_Producer
Jan 17, 2007, 08:53 PM
India has been pointing out to the US government since decades.. regarding the Pakistani ISI motives. Pakistan is nothing but a terrorist training camp ground. No wonder India gets pissed when the US decides to sell F-16s and other weapons to Pakistan and becomes its 'ally' :rolleyes:

Since I was a kid my dad would tell me 'Pakistan is going to use all the American funds to attack the United States one day (directly or indirectly)'

Whatever problems are facing the United States today, it's administration is solely responsible and completely to blame for it. Somehow the 'intelligence' units in this country lack .. er.. intelligence.. I don't know if its that or its just government interference.

zimv20
Jan 17, 2007, 08:57 PM
it's no great surprise, certainly. just interesting that a member of the taleban would admit it.

Dont Hurt Me
Jan 17, 2007, 09:02 PM
This is the same Pakistan thats hiding Osama and all his little buddies. Why is it that our own govt is so darn stupid? Seems our own CIA or whoever are allways helping the wrong people. No confidence at all in our govt,in our President or which way is the wind blowing Congress.

mactastic
Jan 17, 2007, 11:16 PM
Yeah, just another reminder that Bush took his eye off the ball when it mattered most for America. We not only chased the wrong enemy, but we did it in such a way as to play right into the hands of the actual enemy.

Good job Decider. :rolleyes:

solvs
Jan 18, 2007, 04:19 AM
i honestly thought pakistan would be the main focus of the response.

Why would we go after Pakistan? All they have are WMDs, terrorists, drug trafficking, and the people who actually planned 9/11. Iraq didn't have any of those things. Neither does Iran probably. So we had to invade one, and seek to move into the other. NK has the WMDs, the means to use them, and the willingness to sell them, so it's obvious we need to use diplomacy with them.

What part of that doesn't make perfect sense? :confused:

skunk
Jan 18, 2007, 07:19 AM
This guy Dr Hanif also says that Mullah Omar is living in Quetta under ISI protection. But surely we all knew that Pakistan was the operational base for the Taleban? It's been published often enough.

mactastic
Jan 18, 2007, 09:03 AM
This guy Dr Hanif also says that Mullah Omar is living in Quetta under ISI protection. But surely we all knew that Pakistan was the operational base for the Taleban? It's been published often enough.
No, you see no one could have anticipated that the Pakistani ISI wouldn't be able to to distance itself from those they put in power in the first place.

Dont Hurt Me
Jan 18, 2007, 09:05 AM
Must be no Oil in Pakistan.:confused: