Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is Parallels my best option?
- Thread starter Bosox3
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Parallels in coherance mode will be perfect for you. Assuming you have a spare windows license.
You can always get a free trial of it to see if it suits your needs. Plus it can run your bootcamp partition as a virtual machine so you can have both with only one license.
I didn't know that boot camp and parallels could run the same Windows. We have Parallels, and a couple of my wife's old games won't run right. If Boot Camp is cheap with Panther, we will see if we can use it to run her current Parallels XP options.
Will that work?
Will that work?
Boot camp is tiger only, as it only works with intel macs. The latest beta of parallels lets you use your boot camp partition, but some features are disabled.
http://www.codeweavers.com/products/cxmac/
Free to try. Cheap to buy. Does not require Windows at all.
Free to try. Cheap to buy. Does not require Windows at all.
Yes but parallels runs everything. I prefer to pay for something that runs everything i want, every little program that i need, rather than just the ones they support.
They don't seem to support paltalk do they? Or a myriad of other programs you might want to use.
I know, i know... you could just reboot into bootcamp to run these programs but wait... Parallels will let you run your bootcamp partition as a VM so you aren't losing anything.
They don't seem to support paltalk do they? Or a myriad of other programs you might want to use.
I know, i know... you could just reboot into bootcamp to run these programs but wait... Parallels will let you run your bootcamp partition as a VM so you aren't losing anything.
When I ran a comparison between Bootcamp and Parallels (last October), I found Parallels lacking in a couple places and excelling in others.
The following is based on a 1.5GHz Core Solo Mini with 512 RAM:
Processor - 777MHz (P) 1.5GHz (BC)
Memory available to Windows - 178MB (P) 512MB (BC)
Network - wired OR wireless (P) wired AND wireless (BC)
Video - SVGA (P) 3D Graphics (BC)
Parallels also had some advantages over Bootcamp too:
Startup - from within Mac OS (P) Reboot (BC)
Sharing Data - Shared folders configurable (P) Mac can read windows, Windows not see Mac (BC)
Clipboard Cut N Paste - Installable as tool (P) None (BC)
OS Capabilities - Windows 3.11 to 2003, Vista, FreeBSD, OS/2, Solaris (P) Win XP Pro SP2 and above (BC)
(P) = Parallels (BC) = Bootcamp
It is possible Parallels is better now, but for lower end machines, the overhead of runnning Mac OS and Parallels and Windows doesn't leave much for the application you actually want to use. If you have the processor and memory for it and can accept the video and network limitations and feel the $79 is worth it, Parallels could do the job for you. Otherwise, save the money and just use Bootcamp. Either way, you need a Windows license.
The following is based on a 1.5GHz Core Solo Mini with 512 RAM:
Processor - 777MHz (P) 1.5GHz (BC)
Memory available to Windows - 178MB (P) 512MB (BC)
Network - wired OR wireless (P) wired AND wireless (BC)
Video - SVGA (P) 3D Graphics (BC)
Parallels also had some advantages over Bootcamp too:
Startup - from within Mac OS (P) Reboot (BC)
Sharing Data - Shared folders configurable (P) Mac can read windows, Windows not see Mac (BC)
Clipboard Cut N Paste - Installable as tool (P) None (BC)
OS Capabilities - Windows 3.11 to 2003, Vista, FreeBSD, OS/2, Solaris (P) Win XP Pro SP2 and above (BC)
(P) = Parallels (BC) = Bootcamp
It is possible Parallels is better now, but for lower end machines, the overhead of runnning Mac OS and Parallels and Windows doesn't leave much for the application you actually want to use. If you have the processor and memory for it and can accept the video and network limitations and feel the $79 is worth it, Parallels could do the job for you. Otherwise, save the money and just use Bootcamp. Either way, you need a Windows license.
I saw a third product in CompUSA that included Windows. Of course it was pretty expensive, as it was not an upgrade version of Windows.
Buy windows OEM, much cheaper that way. XP Home OEM is only 90 dollars, PRO OEM is 140.
EDIT: Or you can always just take your XP license from an old computer you aren't using any more. Where i work we have XP Pro (Corp) on all our machines which all have a valid XP Home license stuck on the box. I'm not sure of the legality of it but those licenses are all paid up and going to waste...
EDIT: Or you can always just take your XP license from an old computer you aren't using any more. Where i work we have XP Pro (Corp) on all our machines which all have a valid XP Home license stuck on the box. I'm not sure of the legality of it but those licenses are all paid up and going to waste...
It took me a while to figure out how to install Windows under Parallels. I had an old XP Pro that appeared to be non-upgrade, but when installing it, Windows tried to find an existing Windows. So I bought a non-upgrade W98 on the net, hoping to install it first. Turns out I didn't need that, all I needed was to show that CD to the installation while installing XP.
I wonder if I could have used one of my many upgrade CDs instead.
I wonder if I could have used one of my many upgrade CDs instead.
thanks for everyones help! Im new to the mac world..so everything is fairly new to me.
I was wondering, I dont have a XP disk..since my other computer came with it installed already. I have a Install / dell disk only.
Would Windows 2000 work just as well.. instead of XP?
I was wondering, I dont have a XP disk..since my other computer came with it installed already. I have a Install / dell disk only.
Would Windows 2000 work just as well.. instead of XP?
ok..1 last question on this... Ive read a few other posts on this but Im not sure if it would effect me as well.
Is 1 GB enough to run parallels? I heard it might run slow but I was thinking that if I only try to use paltalk..would it do the job?
I wouldnt be running multiple programs at one time..just paltalk.
All of this wouldnt be a problem if the people at paltalk would just make it for mac as well.
Is 1 GB enough to run parallels? I heard it might run slow but I was thinking that if I only try to use paltalk..would it do the job?
I wouldnt be running multiple programs at one time..just paltalk.
All of this wouldnt be a problem if the people at paltalk would just make it for mac as well.
