This has probably been discussed a million times, but which one's better?
I had been trying out Parallels and noticed that whenever I had booted my XP VM, both XP and OSX would be come incredibly slow and sluggish. A coworker told me that VMWare was much better, so I downloaded it, started an unattended install of XP, and as it's installing, I'm browsing the web (in OSX obviously) and have iTunes playing, and the only sign that I even have a VM running is the sound of my DVD drive reading the XP disc. Is VMWare that much better? Or do I need to wait until XP is fully installed before I can make that judgement?
I had been trying out Parallels and noticed that whenever I had booted my XP VM, both XP and OSX would be come incredibly slow and sluggish. A coworker told me that VMWare was much better, so I downloaded it, started an unattended install of XP, and as it's installing, I'm browsing the web (in OSX obviously) and have iTunes playing, and the only sign that I even have a VM running is the sound of my DVD drive reading the XP disc. Is VMWare that much better? Or do I need to wait until XP is fully installed before I can make that judgement?