MacNut
Jun 5, 2007, 08:17 PM
WASHINGTON -- In a victory for TV networks but a setback for efforts to shield children from coarse language, a federal court ruled Monday that broadcasters couldn't be penalized for expletives that were considered impromptu.
The appeals judges in New York repudiated the Federal Communications Commission's recent crackdown on broadcast indecency, calling its efforts "arbitrary and capricious."
Television networks have long complained that enforcement of the rules is inconsistent and unpredictable. Although the court's 2-1 decision sent the issue back to the FCC for rethinking, the strong rebuke prompted some advocacy groups and lawmakers to urge the agency to appeal to the Supreme Court.
"We are very pleased with the court's decision and continue to believe that government regulation of content serves no purpose other than to chill artistic expression in violation of the 1st Amendment," a statement from FOX reads. The case specifically involved two FOX broadcasts, and other networks joined in the lawsuit.
At issue has been a series of unscripted obscenities uttered in recent years by such stars as Bono, Cher and Nicole Richie during live award shows. Networks argued that they shouldn't be punished when an expletive slips through their safeguards.
http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-courtrejectsfccprofanityrulings,0,1700064.story?coll=zap-tv-headlines
The appeals judges in New York repudiated the Federal Communications Commission's recent crackdown on broadcast indecency, calling its efforts "arbitrary and capricious."
Television networks have long complained that enforcement of the rules is inconsistent and unpredictable. Although the court's 2-1 decision sent the issue back to the FCC for rethinking, the strong rebuke prompted some advocacy groups and lawmakers to urge the agency to appeal to the Supreme Court.
"We are very pleased with the court's decision and continue to believe that government regulation of content serves no purpose other than to chill artistic expression in violation of the 1st Amendment," a statement from FOX reads. The case specifically involved two FOX broadcasts, and other networks joined in the lawsuit.
At issue has been a series of unscripted obscenities uttered in recent years by such stars as Bono, Cher and Nicole Richie during live award shows. Networks argued that they shouldn't be punished when an expletive slips through their safeguards.
http://www.zap2it.com/tv/news/zap-courtrejectsfccprofanityrulings,0,1700064.story?coll=zap-tv-headlines
