WTC conspiracy? yes or no

[mikehokie]

More rif raff from NBC, ABC, ect. and all the liberal media outlets. I know it's an old topic but I am just still baffled by some new videos on YouTube trying to prove this garbage.

[.Andy]

What?

[leekohler]

Care to elaborate or provide a link?

[mkrishnan]

Are you talking about this story?

http://www.alternet.org/story/55409/

During a speech Monday at Pat Robertson's Regent University, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani indirectly blamed President Clinton for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks

Or the simulations being run at Purdue?

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/06/22/911-simulation-taxes-purdue-servers/

A two-year Purdue University study released this month supports a federal agency’s conclusion that the impact of the hijacked jetliners stripped away fireproofing material, causing the weakened towers to eventually collapse under their own weight.

[zimv20]

NBC, ABC, ect. and all the liberal media outlets. [...] YouTube

:rolleyes:

so is youtube supposed to be included in your so-called liberal media outlet list?

worst topic starter ever.

[someguy]

WTC conspiracy? yes or no.

Yes. But this topic is pointless to argue. One side is always going to think the other is brainwashed by the opposing side of the media and no one will ever agree. That's what makes a coverup this big so easy to pull off. ;)

</thread participation>

[princealfie]

Da da da. :apple:

[mactastic]

Oh yeah, it's all over theliberalmedia outlets. I thought everyone knew that all lefties think Bush ordered the towers destroyed. Or maybe it was Cheney, since we all know Bush is the sock, not the hand. :rolleyes:

Do I really have to give my spiel about the structural properties of steel as it heats up, and the details of the structural system of the WTC again?

[OnceUGoMac]

Oh yeah, it's all over theliberalmedia outlets. I thought everyone knew that all lefties think Bush ordered the towers destroyed. Or maybe it was Cheney, since we all know Bush is the sock, not the hand. :rolleyes:

Do I really have to give my spiel about the structural properties of steel as it heats up, and the details of the structural system of the WTC again?

Good point, but for some reason people tend to disagree with science and follow the internet trail.:D

[mrkramer]

didn't we have a thread on this recently? and I don't think that any of us really want to go and point out all of the flaws in the conspiracy theories again.

[princealfie]

Good point, but for some reason people tend to disagree with science and follow the internet trail.:D

Hmm... of course scientists can fudge stuff and be paid off too you know :(

[OnceUGoMac]

Hmm... of course scientists can fudge stuff and be paid off too you know :(

Right, like in the conspiracy videos.

[princealfie]

Right, like in the conspiracy videos.

Are you assuming all science is objective?

[OnceUGoMac]

Are you assuming all science is objective?

I trust someone like Mactastic whom has tangible knowledge of the subject over a college kid that made a poor attempt at a documentray.

[IJ Reilly]

This is now the third thread we've seen on this topic. Enough is enough already.

[SMM]

didn't we have a thread on this recently? and I don't think that any of us really want to go and point out all of the flaws in the conspiracy theories again.

I think you need to learn to speak for yourself only. If there is not interest, the thread will die. You need to remember that as a public forum, people should be able to start any thread they want, as long as it is within the guidlines of this site.

As it turns out, I actually have something to add to this subject, but I missed the thread on the first time around.

[plinden]

As it turns out, I actually have something to add to this subject, but I missed the thread on the first time around.
And ...?

[Blue Velvet]

This is now the third thread we've seen on this topic. Enough is enough already.


If that's true, then please provide the links to the threads and either report the thread or post them, and I'll close it so discussion can continue elsewhere. :)

[IJ Reilly]

If that's true, then please provide the links to the threads and either report the thread or post them, and I'll close it so discussion can continue elsewhere. :)

True it is. This thread exhausted the subject in a most exhausting fashion:

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=287929

[Blue Velvet]

Thanks...

As has been noted, this thread is redundant. Please continue this discussion elsewhere, please. :)

http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=287929