View Full Version : Running my MBP without the battery.
jephyb
Aug 2, 2007, 10:08 AM
Hey all,
Just curious... I run my 2.33 GHz MBP as a desktop computer with AC power a lot and usually use a secondary monitor as the main display. Since it's not the best practice to always have the MBP running off of AC power (instead of the battery) because this can decrease battery life, I was wondering if you think it'd be safe to just remove the battery from the MBP as long as I'm using it for more of a "desktop" unit than a mobile unit. I'm also using a Griffin Elevator stand (if that matter for any reason). Any thoughts?
Jephy.
Luis
Aug 2, 2007, 10:10 AM
It's ok to do so. However, bear in mind that if you disconnect the AC power, the computer will automatically shut down and you will lose whatever you were working on. Other than that, do it.
The Stig
Aug 2, 2007, 10:19 AM
It's ok to do so. However, bear in mind that if you disconnect the AC power, the computer will automatically shut down and you will lose whatever you were working on. Other than that, do it.
I agree. Would you ever have to be careful. The magsafe can be so easy to knock out too! I knock mine out all the time even when it is in a "safe" spot.
The best idea would be to run off the battery until it is also dead and then plug it in until it was full and then run off the battery again. You don't want to do that everyday. Apple says if you are running off A/C that you would run your battery down every day or two.
The Stig
Kilamite
Aug 2, 2007, 10:19 AM
Not sure if it still applies to the MBP's but I heard that if you take the battery out, the CPU will only run 1 core or half its performance.
Something like that - someone could clarify that for me though.
myke323
Aug 2, 2007, 10:24 AM
i thought you weren't supposed to remove the battery and run off AC. i'm not sure the exact reason, but i thought i had read that it was not a good thing to do...
but i'd like to know more because i mainly use my MBP at my desk and would like to do the same thing...
blurb23
Aug 2, 2007, 10:25 AM
Not sure if it still applies to the MBP's but I heard that if you take the battery out, the CPU will only run 1 core or half its performance.
Something like that - someone could clarify that for me though.
I think it throttles down to 1 Ghz.
FuzzyinLondon
Aug 2, 2007, 10:30 AM
Not sure if it still applies to the MBP's but I heard that if you take the battery out, the CPU will only run 1 core or half its performance.
Something like that - someone could clarify that for me though.
I've heard that too and it was certainly the case with the core duo machines and I think it is also the case with the core 2 duos too. Therefore you're effectively handicapping your machine if you do so and, like another poster mentioned, risking all your work if the magsafe pops out by accident.
The main point to make is that you're not really doing your machine any harm running it off AC. The problem comes if you never use the battery. Just make sure to run it off the battery every once in a while to 'exercise' it as it were. I would do a calibration every couple of months or so too to.
overcast
Aug 2, 2007, 10:30 AM
Not sure if it still applies to the MBP's but I heard that if you take the battery out, the CPU will only run 1 core or half its performance.
Something like that - someone could clarify that for me though.
That makes no sense at all. Taking the battery out assumes you have endless power through the AC. If anything it should be when you are NOT on AC.
Wolfpup
Aug 2, 2007, 10:33 AM
I think it throttles down to 1 Ghz.
Yeah, that's what I read (I think on Apple's site).
Bizarrely, it supposedly may not have enough power from the power supply to run it at full blast, which is why it does that. That makes zero sense to me though. I mean releasing a system with a power supply that can't actually supply enough power...?
Kilamite
Aug 2, 2007, 10:39 AM
That makes no sense at all. Taking the battery out assumes you have endless power through the AC. If anything it should be when you are NOT on AC.
Maybe you should read the other posts concerning my comment before you post something like that ;)
Luis
Aug 2, 2007, 10:40 AM
That makes no sense at all. Taking the battery out assumes you have endless power through the AC. If anything it should be when you are NOT on AC.
Yeah, endless power that can be cut out unexpectedly at any moment. Especially with magsafe releasing so easily.
maxmax
Aug 2, 2007, 10:45 AM
That makes no sense at all. Taking the battery out assumes you have endless power through the AC. If anything it should be when you are NOT on AC.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305336
ScottDrummer
Aug 2, 2007, 10:50 AM
im no electrician, but considering an average PC/tower/macpro psu kicks out 200W +, the power from a mac charger is 85W, therefore extra wattage is prolly needed from the battery to support running of both cores. the charger is exactly that - a charger. not really an external power source like on a tower or mac pro. I assume with a battery in, the charger can act as an external power source.
overcast
Aug 2, 2007, 11:16 AM
Yeah, endless power that can be cut out unexpectedly at any moment. Especially with magsafe releasing so easily.
Oh so throttling down the CPU will fix that? What does that have to do with a battery? :confused:
overcast
Aug 2, 2007, 11:19 AM
im no electrician, but considering an average PC/tower/macpro psu kicks out 200W +, the power from a mac charger is 85W, therefore extra wattage is prolly needed from the battery to support running of both cores. the charger is exactly that - a charger. not really an external power source like on a tower or mac pro. I assume with a battery in, the charger can act as an external power source.
lol, no laptop is using anywhere near 200W. Have a look at the output power rating for a battery. The charger is more then adequate to run it. The external power source is called your power grid.
Wolfpup
Aug 2, 2007, 11:21 AM
im no electrician, but considering an average PC/tower/macpro psu kicks out 200W +, the power from a mac charger is 85W, therefore extra wattage is prolly needed from the battery to support running of both cores. the charger is exactly that - a charger. not really an external power source like on a tower or mac pro. I assume with a battery in, the charger can act as an external power source.
The "charger" is really the unit's power supply, and if it isn't quite large enough, they should make it provide more power, not skimp out and rely on the batter to pick up the slack.
I've NEVER heard of notebooks have this issue until this. Dell's XPS 1710 even came with a bigger power supply to handle it's Geforce 7950GTX versus the 7900GS in the 1705.
SuperCompu2
Aug 2, 2007, 11:27 AM
Mac Pros only have 200w PSUs?
My Gigabit ethernet G4 has a 220w I think...I guess I just imagined an array of hard drives and a beastly Gfx card would consume more power, along with, you know, 8 cores. (I only have two)
overcast
Aug 2, 2007, 12:30 PM
Mac Pros only have 200w PSUs?
My Gigabit ethernet G4 has a 220w I think...I guess I just imagined an array of hard drives and a beastly Gfx card would consume more power, along with, you know, 8 cores. (I only have two)
No, MacPro's have 1000w power supplies. That doesn't mean they use 1000w. A highend gaming rig can easily get by with 500w, typically using maybe 250-350w. The whole watt race with power supply manufacturers is just marketing.
jephyb
Aug 2, 2007, 03:39 PM
It is rather interesting though... When I had the battery out and running soley on AC power and using that external monitor, I swore Warcraft III didn't run NEARLY as nice... It was still very choppy and even caused a greater amount of lag for me. I found when I actually quit the application, put the battery back in, and booted the game up again it ran as smoothly as it has in the past.
I'm just concerned about killing the battery on this thing too soon. I suppose that what AppleCare is for, but there's some stipulation with battery replacements... Like, they won't replace the battery if you've killed X amount of cycles on it...or something along those lines.
Luis
Aug 2, 2007, 05:58 PM
Oh so throttling down the CPU will fix that? What does that have to do with a battery? :confused:
The charger does not have enough power to run both cores, as someone already said. It is a "charger" after all, not an external power supply. It can act as one, but is not designed for that.
/V\acpower
Aug 2, 2007, 06:31 PM
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305336
From Apple.com
Wolfpup
Aug 2, 2007, 07:00 PM
The charger does not have enough power to run both cores, as someone already said. It is a "charger" after all, not an external power supply. It can act as one, but is not designed for that.
Yes, it is. It's a power supply. I said it before and I'll say it again. If that adapter doesn't provide enough power to run the system at full blast, Apple needs to provide a bigger/better one.
What happens when you run your system at full blast continuously? There's no reason you shouldn't be able to, but basically Apple is saying you can't with this thing. They're apparently expecting it to have idle time for the battery to catch up. That's an insane design.
And this whole "2 core" thing has nothing to do with anything. The CPU's one of the bigger power draws, as is the GPU, the screen, etc.
gr8tfly
Aug 2, 2007, 07:11 PM
Both cores continue to run, but at only 1GHz.
aquajet
Aug 2, 2007, 07:20 PM
Yes, it is. It's a power supply. I said it before and I'll say it again. If that adapter doesn't provide enough power to run the system at full blast, Apple needs to provide a bigger/better one.
What happens when you run your system at full blast continuously? There's no reason you shouldn't be able to, but basically Apple is saying you can't with this thing. They're apparently expecting it to have idle time for the battery to catch up. That's an insane design.
And this whole "2 core" thing has nothing to do with anything. The CPU's one of the bigger power draws, as is the GPU, the screen, etc.
You must be new to Apple. ;)
It's no secret Apple make compromises from time to time. In this case, it's a less powerful power supply in order to reduce size and weight. Does this affect the performance of the machine? No. Is it something to worry about? Not until the battery is old and unable to hold a charge.
Wolfpup
Aug 2, 2007, 07:22 PM
You must be new to Apple. ;)
It's no secret Apple make compromises from time to time. In this case, it's a less powerful power supply in order to reduce size and weight. Does this affect the performance of the machine? No. Is it something to worry about? Not until the battery is old and unable to hold a charge.
Yes, it does affect it's performance if you can't actually use the machine at full blast. And it's just absurd-I think a defect-to sell a system with a power supply that's too small. You'd swear people are falling over from the "weight" of these things or something :D
gr8tfly
Aug 2, 2007, 08:03 PM
Yes, it does affect it's performance if you can't actually use the machine at full blast. And it's just absurd-I think a defect-to sell a system with a power supply that's too small. You'd swear people are falling over from the "weight" of these things or something :D
No, it doesn't affect performance when you run with the battery installed. There is no limitation on running full speed. I've done it many, many times and the battery remains at full charge.
The power supply has sufficient wattage to run the machine at full speed.
per Apple spec for the MacBook Pro:
DC input: 18.5 Vdc, 4.6A maximum.
18.5 * 4.6 = 85.1W
Based on Apple's reason for the clock speed reduction, I would assume the maximum current rating is continuous. The MBP might exceed this due to surges from, for example, harddrive spinup. With the battery installed, it can provide that momentary current surge.
Gandhi
Aug 2, 2007, 08:24 PM
Also keep in mind that when you remove the battery, you are exposing the innards of the laptop to external dust. Once the fans kick on, this newly created gaping hole may start sucking in dust and depositing it on things that should not be exposed to such dust.
I use the laptop plugged in until the battery is fully charged, then unplug it and run on battery until it full drains and the laptop goes to sleep. Let is rest for a while and plug it back in.
e12a
Aug 2, 2007, 08:28 PM
it down throttles the CPU.
both cores are still utilized. I wouldnt recommend running without the battery though. There's really no point in taking it out unless you want dust in your bay.
and at my dorm last year we had a blackout while i was using my MBP. It does happen so just leave the battery in.
Wolfpup
Aug 2, 2007, 08:31 PM
Also keep in mind that when you remove the battery, you are exposing the innards of the laptop to external dust. Once the fans kick on, this newly created gaping hole may start sucking in dust and depositing it on things that should not be exposed to such dust.
I use the laptop plugged in until the battery is fully charged, then unplug it and run on battery until it full drains and the laptop goes to sleep. Let is rest for a while and plug it back in.
That's bad on the battery. You're better off keeping it fully charged. Lithium batteries don't like being discharged.
Luis
Aug 2, 2007, 09:17 PM
Yes, it does affect it's performance if you can't actually use the machine at full blast. And it's just absurd-I think a defect-to sell a system with a power supply that's too small. You'd swear people are falling over from the "weight" of these things or something :D
You can run the system at full blast, just that you'll run out of battery eventually. Either ways, laptops are not designed to run at full blast always and that certainly took part in the design.
Wolfpup
Aug 3, 2007, 09:15 AM
You can run the system at full blast, just that you'll run out of battery eventually. Either ways, laptops are not designed to run at full blast always and that certainly took part in the design.
Mine will be though. So I kind of need to know ahead of time if the system can't handle that. I won't buy a system that can't run a copy of Folding for every CPU all the time.
gnasher729
Aug 3, 2007, 09:29 AM
Hey all,
Just curious... I run my 2.33 GHz MBP as a desktop computer with AC power a lot and usually use a secondary monitor as the main display. Since it's not the best practice to always have the MBP running off of AC power (instead of the battery) because this can decrease battery life, I was wondering if you think it'd be safe to just remove the battery from the MBP as long as I'm using it for more of a "desktop" unit than a mobile unit. I'm also using a Griffin Elevator stand (if that matter for any reason). Any thoughts?
The decrease of battery life doesn't come from running on AC power, it comes from not using the battery. You will get the same decrease if the battery is lying around somewhere, so you don't gain anything. Just use the computer unplugged every two weeks. And apart from the disadvantages that others posted, there is the risk of dirt getting into your computer or the battery getting dirty or damaged while it is outside the computer. So don't do it.
Wolfpup
Aug 3, 2007, 09:34 AM
The decrease of battery life doesn't come from running on AC power, it comes from not using the battery. You will get the same decrease if the battery is lying around somewhere, so you don't gain anything. Just use the computer unplugged every two weeks. And apart from the disadvantages that others posted, there is the risk of dirt getting into your computer or the battery getting dirty or damaged while it is outside the computer. So don't do it.
Lithium batteries degrade naturally regardless of whether you're using them or not. They degrade faster if you do use them-they like to be kept fully charged. But officially most companies act like they have a life of two years (in reality it's more like they've lost 20% of their capacity even if you don't use them, if I'm remembering right, and even more if you do).
gnasher729
Aug 3, 2007, 09:40 AM
Yes, it does affect it's performance if you can't actually use the machine at full blast. And it's just absurd-I think a defect-to sell a system with a power supply that's too small. You'd swear people are falling over from the "weight" of these things or something :D
The power supply is absolutely sufficient to run at full blast permanently - when the battery is plugged in.
The battery is needed as a reserve for short moments where you use _more_ than full blast. Consider running a program that suddenly starts using both cores and the GPU at full blast, and then - just at the same time - the fans kick on, and the program starts reading from the harddisk and the DVD drive. Fans, harddisk and DVD drive accelerate all at the same time. That takes extra power, only for a second or so.
Since nobody uses the MBP without battery, it would be a pointless waste of money to make a bigger, heavier and more expensive power supply just for that rare situation. Instead, Apple supplied a cheap and reliable temporary solution.
gnasher729
Aug 3, 2007, 09:45 AM
You can run the system at full blast, just that you'll run out of battery eventually. Either ways, laptops are not designed to run at full blast always and that certainly took part in the design.
It's hard to run at "full blast". You would have to keep the CPU, the GPU, the harddisk, and the DVD drive running and doing things simultaneously all the time. For example, running Handbrake continuously won't manage to uncharge your battery, because the GPU doesn't do much, and the DVD drive and harddisk are not actively reading/writing most of the time. You'd probably have to write a program specifically to achieve this.
Wolfpup
Aug 3, 2007, 10:50 AM
The power supply is absolutely sufficient to run at full blast permanently - when the battery is plugged in.
The battery is needed as a reserve for short moments where you use _more_ than full blast. Consider running a program that suddenly starts using both cores and the GPU at full blast, and then - just at the same time - the fans kick on, and the program starts reading from the harddisk and the DVD drive. Fans, harddisk and DVD drive accelerate all at the same time. That takes extra power, only for a second or so.
Since nobody uses the MBP without battery, it would be a pointless waste of money to make a bigger, heavier and more expensive power supply just for that rare situation. Instead, Apple supplied a cheap and reliable temporary solution.
Okay, that's not TOO unreasonable I guess, though I'd prefer it be a bit larger to compensate.
As long as it can run the CPU and GPU continuously at full blast without issue...
Frosty1
Aug 3, 2007, 12:29 PM
just leave the battery in, it does no harm to your system or to the battery. When your battery is fully charged it does not charge anymore, and there therefore does not cause any damage.
leave the battery in when its fully charged it like its running on A/C power without the battery, but you dont get your cores slowed down, and if a power outage occurs it wont mess up your Mac because your battery is in.
aquajet
Aug 3, 2007, 12:34 PM
Lithium batteries degrade naturally regardless of whether you're using them or not. They degrade faster if you do use them-they like to be kept fully charged.
Lithium ion batteries actually degrade faster if they're kept fully charged all of the time, which is the reason why Apple specifically recommends not keeping your portable plugged in all of the time.
iSee
Aug 3, 2007, 12:47 PM
I tried running my 2.16 MBP Core Duo without the battery. According to the CoreDuoTemp utility, my MBP did clock down to 1 GHz, even when running under a heavy load. In Activity Monitor, it appeared to have access to both cores.
The MBP immediately went back to 2.17 GHz when I put the battery back in.
So, my real world experiment verifies what many people have noted.
/V\acpower
Aug 3, 2007, 12:53 PM
Lithium ion batteries actually degrade faster if they're kept fully charged all of the time, which is the reason why Apple specifically recommends not keeping your portable plugged in all of the time.
Taking care of Lithium ion battery seem closer from sorcery than science.
I mean, everyone have their own belief and ritual regarding this.
aquajet
Aug 3, 2007, 01:00 PM
Taking care of Lithium ion battery seem closer from sorcery than science.
I mean, everyone have their own belief and ritual regarding this.
There is no sorcery involved, only fact and fiction. And plenty of fiction has been told on this forum.
The properties of the various battery technologies are well-known and there are a few simple guidelines to follow if you want to maximize the longevity of your battery. I would suggest reading all the info available on Lithium Ion batteries at www.batteryuniversity.com for a good primer on the subject. There's also info on other battery types as well, if you're interested.
overcast
Aug 3, 2007, 04:43 PM
The charger does not have enough power to run both cores, as someone already said. It is a "charger" after all, not an external power supply. It can act as one, but is not designed for that.
What the hell are you talking about, if it's not a power supply, what is it doing then? What exactly is the difference between a "charger" and a power supply?????? The only thing making it a "charger" is the fact that the battery is charging itself off of it. If I hooked up a computer power supply to a battery, is it now magically a charger and not a power supply? :confused::confused::confused:
Luis
Aug 3, 2007, 05:00 PM
What the hell are you talking about, if it's not a power supply, what is it doing then? What exactly is the difference between a "charger" and a power supply?????? The only thing making it a "charger" is the fact that the battery is charging itself off of it. If I hooked up a computer power supply to a battery, is it now magically a charger and not a power supply? :confused::confused::confused:
What i'm trying to say is that the MBP charger is not a full-blown power supply as you would find in desktops. It is not designed for that, it is designed to be a charger, to charge a battery, that's the difference.
Wolfpup
Aug 3, 2007, 06:26 PM
As Overcast says, that's a silly distinction. It's a power supply. It should have enough power for a worst case scenario. Anything less is putting looks over function-which Apple does far too often I think. Either that or they're just saving a few cents by including a smaller PSU.
Luis
Aug 3, 2007, 06:34 PM
As Overcast says, that's a silly distinction. It's a power supply. It should have enough power for a worst case scenario. [b]Anything less is putting looks over function-which Apple does far too often I think/[b]. Either that or they're just saving a few cents by including a smaller PSU.
-Yeah, one that is designed to charge a battery
-And this is relevant to the topic?
Jacksteruk309
Aug 3, 2007, 06:59 PM
A few weeks ago my battery had to be sent back to Apple and so I was running on AC for a week and a half and I noticed no decrease in my clock speed. Most people probably don't keep track of their clock speed like I do, but I have it in my menu bar, so yeah I know what it is pretty much all the time :)
I know the Apple doc contradicts my experience, but I'm just saying it as it was.
Also, I'm not sure of how truthful this is, but I heard a report that the Core 2s can't actually turn off one of the cores to conserve energy. When one core is disabled supposedly that core just runs at 100% with some dummy process. Don't quote me on that though ;)
overcast
Aug 3, 2007, 07:11 PM
A few weeks ago my battery had to be sent back to Apple and so I was running on AC for a week and a half and I noticed no decrease in my clock speed. Most people probably don't keep track of their clock speed like I do, but I have it in my menu bar, so yeah I know what it is pretty much all the time :)
I know the Apple doc contradicts my experience, but I'm just saying it as it was.
Also, I'm not sure of how truthful this is, but I heard a report that the Core 2s can't actually turn off one of the cores to conserve energy. When one core is disabled supposedly that core just runs at 100% with some dummy process. Don't quote me on that though ;)
When one core is disabled, it's not running anything at 100%.
Wolfpup
Aug 3, 2007, 08:06 PM
-yeah, designed to charge a battery.
-and this is relevant to the topic because?
Because it's exactly what the topic is about?
Luis
Aug 3, 2007, 08:14 PM
Because it's exactly what the topic is about?
Anything less is putting looks over function-which Apple does far too often I think.
?
KhaKha
Aug 3, 2007, 08:23 PM
I ask about that issue to my local apple technician,
he said that if you want to have your logicboard burned , just plug the magsafe without battery
aquajet
Aug 3, 2007, 09:01 PM
I ask about that issue to my local apple technician,
he said that if you want to have your logicboard burned , just plug the magsafe without battery
That Apple technician is full of ****.
Wolfpup
Aug 6, 2007, 09:52 AM
?
I can guarantee you that randomly question whether something is relevant to a topic is NOT relevant to a topic :D
overcast
Aug 7, 2007, 09:23 AM
I ask about that issue to my local apple technician,
he said that if you want to have your logicboard burned , just plug the magsafe without battery
LOL:rolleyes::rolleyes:
Wolfpup
Aug 7, 2007, 11:07 AM
Yeah, that's disappointing that Apple employs some idiots too :D
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.