View Full Version : Question about forum rankings
thesdx
Oct 8, 2007, 12:14 PM
I still don't quite understand the ranking system of the forums. Obviously, there's "Newbie", "MacRumors Member", and "MacRumors Regular", but some users have strange rankings, like "MacRumors 6502". Then, there's "Demi-God(dess)" and "Contributor". Could someone explain it to me?
skunk
Oct 8, 2007, 12:15 PM
It all depends on how many special powers you have.
bartelby
Oct 8, 2007, 12:18 PM
If you have no special powers you'll have to read the FAQ I'm afraid:)
Jaffa Cake
Oct 8, 2007, 12:19 PM
It's all explained in the FAQ, (http://guides.macrumors.com/Help:MacRumors_FAQ#How_do_user_titles_work.3F) along with various other forum related stuff.
thesdx
Oct 8, 2007, 12:21 PM
Thanks! Sorry...:o
rdowns
Oct 8, 2007, 12:23 PM
How ironic your question given the location in your profile. :D
Doctor Q
Oct 8, 2007, 02:43 PM
Our FAQ fails to explain why some members have a little icon under their user title (sample). Luckily, you can mouseover the icon for an explanation!
Eidorian
Oct 8, 2007, 02:53 PM
Alas 20,000 posts for G3.
rdowns
Oct 8, 2007, 07:44 PM
Looks like we'll be crowning our first G5 soon.
Kamera RAWr
Oct 9, 2007, 12:51 AM
Looks like we'll be crowning our first G5 soon.
Who would that be?! Madjew perhaps?? :p
mad jew
Oct 9, 2007, 06:16 AM
Won't be for ages, lads.
rdowns
Oct 9, 2007, 06:21 AM
Won't be for ages, lads.
Puhleeze, you're a mere 205 posts away. Unless Australia drops off the grid, it should happen in 10-20 days.
synth3tik
Oct 9, 2007, 06:34 AM
How ironic your question given the location in your profile. :D
ooooh, Nice!:D
Eraserhead
Oct 9, 2007, 11:47 AM
Puhleeze, you're a mere 205 posts away. Unless Australia drops off the grid, it should happen in 10-20 days.
Unless you need more than 30k posts to hit G5, you might need 35k, 40k or even 50k ;) (the G4 was the processor of choice for ages, so the Gods may have decided that).
MacNut
Oct 9, 2007, 02:43 PM
Unless you need more than 30k posts to hit G5, you might need 35k, 40k or even 50k ;) (the G4 was the processor of choice for ages, so the Gods may have decided that).More spam, we must know the answer.:cool:
rdowns
Oct 9, 2007, 07:27 PM
the G4 was the only damn processor that we had for eons.
Fixed that for you.
Eidorian
Oct 9, 2007, 08:25 PM
Fixed that for you.Post of the day. :D
rdowns
Oct 10, 2007, 06:14 AM
Puhleeze, you're a mere 205 posts away. Unless Australia drops off the grid, it should happen in 10-20 days.
175 and counting. Looks like someone is making the push to 30K. ;)
mad jew
Oct 10, 2007, 06:33 AM
Looks like someone is looking at someone making the push to 30,000.
epicwelshman
Oct 10, 2007, 12:05 PM
Boy do I feel small. I'm only at the threshold to 500 :(
PlaceofDis
Oct 10, 2007, 12:14 PM
Boy do I feel small. I'm only at the threshold to 500 :(
yes, but everyone over 500 was there at one point :p
epicwelshman
Oct 10, 2007, 12:32 PM
yes, but everyone over 500 was there at one point :p
Very very true. It's funny how internet communities work, if you think about it.
Eidorian
Oct 10, 2007, 02:00 PM
Very very true. It's funny how internet communities work, if you think about it.It's quite easy to get over 500 if you're active. It's a level of commitment. :rolleyes:
Doctor Q
Oct 10, 2007, 03:20 PM
It's quite easy to get over 500 if you're active. It's a level of commitment. :rolleyes:It's easy. Ditch your friends. Quit your job. Get a really fast Internet connection. The rest will be straightforward. Until they come to repossess the chair you are sitting in.
Eidorian
Oct 10, 2007, 03:23 PM
It's easy. Ditch your friends. Quit your job. Get a really fast Internet connection. The rest will be straightforward. Until they come to repossess the chair you are sitting in.You forgot to live in Forum Spy.
twoodcc
Oct 11, 2007, 08:14 AM
You forgot to live in Forum Spy.
forum spy is overrated
Eidorian
Oct 11, 2007, 09:57 AM
forum spy is overratedIt beats hitting refresh and trying to find that one thread you've posted in.
twoodcc
Oct 11, 2007, 10:02 AM
It beats hitting refresh and trying to find that one thread you've posted in.
maybe so. i guess it's good if posting here is all your doing. i can't really use it at work, and at home i'm always doing more than one thing at a time
Eidorian
Oct 11, 2007, 10:03 AM
maybe so. i guess it's good if posting here is all your doing. i can't really use it at work, and at home i'm always doing more than one thing at a timeI does take some skill to multi-task.
twoodcc
Oct 11, 2007, 10:10 AM
I does take some skill to multi-task.
well i mean, if you are using forum spy, then go do something out of the room, come back, and forum spy has stopped.
that's just one example.
but i'm not saying forum spy is a waste......i do use it sometimes
Eidorian
Oct 11, 2007, 10:19 AM
well i mean, if you are using forum spy, then go do something out of the room, come back, and forum spy has stopped.
that's just one example.
but i'm not saying forum spy is a waste......i do use it sometimesI've only had Forum Spy normally stop from being idle.
PlaceofDis
Oct 11, 2007, 10:31 AM
i still don't use Forum Spy. just doesn't work for me. New Posts all the way. :P
Eidorian
Oct 11, 2007, 10:34 AM
i still don't use Forum Spy. just doesn't work for me. New Posts all the way. :PYou might want to enable thread subscriptions as well when you use Forum Spy.
New posts can be helpful but once again you have to keep making a new search.
mad jew
Oct 11, 2007, 06:34 PM
i still don't use Forum Spy. just doesn't work for me. New Posts all the way. :P
Same here. Forum Spy is just soooo sloooow.
Diatribe
Oct 11, 2007, 06:43 PM
It beats hitting refresh and trying to find that one thread you've posted in.
I thought that was what User CP was for... :p
Eidorian
Oct 11, 2007, 06:45 PM
I thought that was what User CP was for... :pI still find using thread subscriptions in conjunction with Forum Spy to be more efficient.
New posts is only fast the first time. Forum Spy allows a constant stream of thread updates without the need to refresh the page.
twoodcc
Oct 11, 2007, 07:28 PM
I still find using thread subscriptions in conjunction with Forum Spy to be more efficient.
New posts is only fast the first time. Forum Spy allows a constant stream of thread updates without the need to refresh the page.
i really don't hit the refresh....i just move on to another forum, and then come back later
Eidorian
Oct 11, 2007, 07:30 PM
i really don't hit the refresh....i just move on to another forum, and then come back laterThat's so many pages to load before you even get to a thread. Ouch!
rdowns
Oct 11, 2007, 07:56 PM
Multiple tabs- New posts, my posts and whatever else I'm into at that time.
Forum Spy once in a blue moon.
Eidorian
Oct 11, 2007, 07:57 PM
Multiple tabs- New posts, my posts and whatever else I'm into at that time.
Forum Spy once in a blue moon.Do you ever close your browser? :p
That'd be a lot of tabs for me.
rdowns
Oct 11, 2007, 08:34 PM
Do you ever close your browser? :p
That'd be a lot of tabs for me.
When Safari is at 1GB of RAM. Only 62MB to go. :p
twoodcc
Oct 12, 2007, 07:50 AM
That's so many pages to load before you even get to a thread. Ouch!
nah.....not bad at all.
remember, there's more than one way to eat a reeces
Eidorian
Oct 12, 2007, 07:59 AM
nah.....not bad at all.
remember, there's more than one way to eat a reecesQuite true. I was going to bring it up myself as well.
mad jew
Oct 13, 2007, 03:35 AM
Since almost all the images would be in the cache, it'd be pretty quick. I can have up to a hundred tabs open at any one time for MacRumors, using Safari.
calculus
Oct 13, 2007, 03:59 AM
The real problem with Forum Spy is that, much of the time, the left hand column just says 'mad jew';)
bartelby
Oct 13, 2007, 04:02 AM
The real problem with Forum Spy is that, much of the time, the left hand column just says 'mad jew';)
Right now is a pretty good example!
mad jew
Oct 13, 2007, 04:02 AM
It's all of your fault for not keeping up. You're all lazy slackers!
Eidorian
Oct 13, 2007, 11:08 AM
Since almost all the images would be in the cache, it'd be pretty quick. I can have up to a hundred tabs open at any one time for MacRumors, using Safari.How long do you manage to keep Safari open? :D
Sun Baked
Oct 13, 2007, 11:10 AM
It's all of your fault for not keeping up. You're all lazy slackers!
The reality of life must really be shocking when MacRumors is down for routine maintenance. :eek:
Eidorian
Oct 13, 2007, 11:13 AM
The reality of life must really be shocking when MacRumors is down for routine maintenance. :eek:It is.
mad jew
Oct 13, 2007, 07:39 PM
How long do you manage to keep Safari open? :D
It stays fine right up until the point I open a tab for MySpace.
The reality of life must really be shocking when MacRumors is down for routine maintenance. :eek:
That's what repairing permissions is for. Mmm...
Eidorian
Oct 13, 2007, 07:43 PM
It stays fine right up until the point I open a tab for MySpace.Ah wonderful MySpace.
I love Safari but I've migrated over to FireFox for my browsing of MacRumors and Forum Spy.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.