Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mattman84

macrumors newbie
Original poster
I've been reading these forums for the past few days now and I'd love to get some insight from the more experienced.

My PC's motherboard died the other day, and as I was pricing out getting a new motherboard and updating the processor, RAM, and graphics card, I came to the realization that it's finally time for me to go Mac. There's really no reason for me not to, with Bootcamp and all. I've worked with Macs quite a bit on yearbook in high school and several projects in college. I do a fair amount of audio and video production and I would love to use it for all that.

Anyway, I've got friend at a retail store that can hook me up with a 15% Friends and Family discount, so now is the time. Cost is a very large factor for me.

Now that the background is out of the way, on to the questions...

First of all, I'm torn between getting a 2.4 20" or a 2.4 24". I already have a 19" widescreen Acer monitor that I will run alongside whichever one I get. Will it look particularly awkward being next to the 24"? Or will the spanning be more natural with a 20"? I love screen real estate, but I don't want it to be awkward.

And next, if I do get the 24", is it worth the extra $250 for the 2.8 processor?

I'll be upgrading RAM on my own. I can add a 1 gig stick for a total of 2 for $30 from Crucial. Or, I can add a 2 gig stick for $100 for a total of 3. I probably wouldn't go for 4 ($200). Does anyone think I will see a large benefit from 3 gigs over 2? I'll be coming from a setup with 512 so I'm sure either one will be heaven.

Thanks for indulging my lengthy question. I'm about to be a proud new Mac owner...I just want to make sure I'm not kicking myself over features later. Thanks!
 
20" or 24": Get a 24" with its nice resolution. You can have a photo on the iMac screen and palettes on the 19". When you get cash, you will be able to buy a another 24" screen and connect the two to make it an even span.

2.4 vs. 2.8: I will let the numbers do the talking.
http://barefeats.com/imacal2.html
http://barefeats.com/imacal4.html
http://barefeats.com/imacal.html


Ram, 2GBs vs 4Gbs: Again I will let the numbers do the talking.
http://barefeats.com/imacal4.html

--Photoshop Test--

"iMac 2.8 4Gb Ram: 136 Seconds"
"iMac 2.8 2Gb Ram: 194 Seconds"

-Barefeats

macsales.com has 4GB ram set, 2 x 2GBs Ram chips, for $155.97.
 
I am looking at possibly purchasing a new iMac as well and find these links very useful in asissting with my decision - thanks. 😎

Im not trying to say that everyone should get a 2.8Ghz machine but people should know what they might be losing out and may decide that $250 is better worth buying 4Gbs of ram instead of getting the CPU upgrade. 😀
 
Thanks for the reply. I didn't really expect the 2.8 to have such better performance. And 4 gigs for $155 is a great deal.
 
Im not trying to say that everyone should get a 2.8Ghz machine but people should know what they might be losing out and may decide that $250 is better worth buying 4Gbs of ram instead of getting the CPU upgrade. 😀

Oh for sure, I wasn't implying your post was biased, just that it honestly helps in making my decision to see the #s and decide if the extra $ is worth it based on my needs and usage. 😉 🙂
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.