cleo
Apr 16, 2002, 02:52 PM
I converted to Macs with the coming of the new iMac. I now own one of those and an iBook 600. All in all, I am quite pleased. But one thing keeps me returning to my PC at least a couple of times a week: a decent, OS X-native semi-pro image editor that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.
I have used Jasc's Paint Shop Pro for Windows for about 8 years, and have so far found nothing on the Mac platform that begins to compete with PSP in terms of value for price. PSP costs about $100, is much more full-featured (and user-friendly) than Graphic Converter, has an excellent built-in file browser, includes vector tools (including the option of creating text as vectors and on paths), and allows me to have full control over the output of my images. I was nearly banging my head against the wall yesterday when I needed to do some (what I consider to be) basic image editing (cropping and resizing images) and found it to be much more difficult with the tools I have at my disposal on the Mac than with PSP on the PC.
Yes, I will probably wind up forking over $300 for Photoshop one of these days - but I don't think I should have to. Why is there not a graphics tool available to semi-pro/serious hobbyists that falls somewhere between the useless bloat of GC and the hefty price of PS?
</rant>
I have used Jasc's Paint Shop Pro for Windows for about 8 years, and have so far found nothing on the Mac platform that begins to compete with PSP in terms of value for price. PSP costs about $100, is much more full-featured (and user-friendly) than Graphic Converter, has an excellent built-in file browser, includes vector tools (including the option of creating text as vectors and on paths), and allows me to have full control over the output of my images. I was nearly banging my head against the wall yesterday when I needed to do some (what I consider to be) basic image editing (cropping and resizing images) and found it to be much more difficult with the tools I have at my disposal on the Mac than with PSP on the PC.
Yes, I will probably wind up forking over $300 for Photoshop one of these days - but I don't think I should have to. Why is there not a graphics tool available to semi-pro/serious hobbyists that falls somewhere between the useless bloat of GC and the hefty price of PS?
</rant>
