Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Burst's $10 Million Patent Settlement: Quicktime, iTunes, ... DVR?

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,555
30,882


As a followup to a report from 2006, Apple and Burst.com have settled their patent dispute for $10 million dollars.

Burst.com sued Apple over patent claims involving "the delivery of music or video over the Internet 'faster than real-time.'" This involves the technology involved in streaming and delivering video and audio content on the internet as Apple does with iTunes and Quicktime streaming software.

In the settlement, Apple will pay Burst.com a one-time $10 million license fee for its current patent portfolio. Meanwhile, Burst has one existing and three pending DVR patents that do not fall within this agreement. However, the press release explicitly states that Burst will not sue Apple in the future over these DVR technology patents.


Article Link
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2007/11/26/bursts-10-million-patent-settlement-quicktime-itunes-dvr/
Consultant

Consultant

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,314
34
Damnit please stop giving in to patent trolls! If no one gave them any money, then they won't have money to sue!
 
edcrosay

edcrosay

macrumors member
Oct 27, 2005
81
0
I'm suprised they settled. It was for fairly cheap though. The patent appeared pretty bogus.

DVR would make the Apple TV worthwhile. I'd buy one in a heartbeat if it had DVR functionality.
 
Stella

Stella

macrumors G3
Apr 21, 2003
8,838
6,341
Canada
Consultant said:
Damnit please stop giving in to patent trolls! If no one gave them any money, then they won't have money to sue!
Click to expand...

If Burst is a ligit company with a product out there, then they aren't really patent trolls. A patent troll is an entity who buys patents , directly or indirectly, without a product and then starts suing. It would be if another company started using multitouch in the same way as Apple's implementation.

Patents are abused and hamper innovation.
 
emw

emw

macrumors G4
Aug 2, 2004
11,172
0
I love their website. The main screen contains news links about Burst.com - about 80% of them are legal-related, as opposed to product-related.
 
Peace

Peace

Cancelled
Apr 1, 2005
19,546
4,556
Space The Only Frontier
Well it seems since 3 companies have settled/licensed Burst technology they have verifiable legal patents.Kudos to them for standing up to the big guys and collecting.
 
D

destroyboredom

macrumors 6502
Dec 16, 2002
382
101
Washington, DC.
I hope they put that money to good use. Like re-design their website that looks like its 10 years old. May be buy themselves some nice Macs and a graphic designer or two.
 
W

WestonHarvey1

macrumors 68030
Jan 9, 2007
2,773
2,191
I don't get it

twoodcc said:
same here. i hope it happens
Click to expand...

What are you guys really asking for here? You want the Apple TV to have a CableCard or a satellite tuner in it?

That isn't what the Apple TV is. The content source is intended to be iTunes - in that regard, it is already a DVR - for online content. It is a big iPod for your living room. It is a Mac that runs only FrontRow that goes in your living room. There are lots of metaphors for it, but something that records traditional television is not one of them. That's not what it was intended for.

I love mine, probably because I accept it for what it is. I'm not interested in traditional TV anymore - as soon as I can get the cable news channels in some streaming format, I will happily ditch my DirecTV and my Tivo... Tivo is a band-aid solution that bridges the gap between the past and the future. Once all content is IP delivered, we won't need DVRs at all.

I just wish it had iTunes Store. It's on the iPhone, so it is time for it to make the jump.
 
~Shard~

~Shard~

macrumors P6
Jun 4, 2003
18,377
48
1123.6536.5321
DVR in the future? That would be great, but Apple would have to implement things such that it wouldn't cannibalize iTMS sales as a result...
 
N

neutrino23

macrumors 68000
Feb 14, 2003
1,881
391
SF Bay area
It seems to me that the technology is way more interesting than the content. I just spent a while looking over the next week's programming on TitanTV and I couldn't find anything I wanted to record. This is with a digital tuner. Off topic but it seems that most channels only show movies on the analog broadcasts. The digital broadcasts have very few movies. This will have to change in a few years when they stop broadcasting in analog.
 
happydude

happydude

macrumors 65816
Sep 2, 2006
1,197
795
a gasping dying planet
agreed

edcrosay said:
I'm suprised they settled. It was for fairly cheap though. The patent appeared pretty bogus.

DVR would make the Apple TV worthwhile. I'd buy one in a heartbeat if it had DVR functionality.
Click to expand...

the cut off to the outside world in general of appletv (no broadcast/cable/satellite tv capability) is what is keeping me from buying an appletv. if one could hook up the cable line/dvr/whathaveyou, i'd be all in.
 
mmcneil

mmcneil

macrumors regular
Sep 4, 2001
222
62
Indianapolis, IN
Patents

Whether Burst is a Patent Troll or not - this is another example of a bogus patent issued by the U.S. Patent Office. Not dissimilar from the "One Click" patent and many others - they should not be patenting web & software technologies that build on basic, well understood concepts. Downloading music "faster than real-time" pretty much says it all.
 
D

dashiel

macrumors 6502a
Nov 12, 2003
876
0
WestonHarvey1 said:
What are you guys really asking for here? You want the Apple TV to have a CableCard or a satellite tuner in it?

That isn't what the Apple TV is. The content source is intended to be iTunes - in that regard, it is already a DVR - for online content. It is a big iPod for your living room. It is a Mac that runs only FrontRow that goes in your living room. There are lots of metaphors for it, but something that records traditional television is not one of them. That's not what it was intended for.

I love mine, probably because I accept it for what it is. I'm not interested in traditional TV anymore - as soon as I can get the cable news channels in some streaming format, I will happily ditch my DirecTV and my Tivo... Tivo is a band-aid solution that bridges the gap between the past and the future. Once all content is IP delivered, we won't need DVRs at all.

I just wish it had iTunes Store. It's on the iPhone, so it is time for it to make the jump.
Click to expand...

i see this as a strategic move against nbc/universal.

i too only get television through itunes, but at least three shows i subscribed to are no longer available. apple countered the short-sighted move sending a ten-million dollar message effectively saying - "if you don't want to sell your content through us we'll give our users a way to get it for free*"

to be sure it's not the only reason they settled the patent, but it's certainly a very clear threat being sent without officially commenting on future products.

* i know it's not really free, but the content companies' revenue stream is less direct than with the online sales.
 
hob

hob

macrumors 68010
Oct 4, 2003
2,004
0
London, UK
That's a total joke. I take it they'll also be sueing YouTube, then?

What is the big deal with patents. If nothing was patented, would the world collapse? No.

If something like the iPhone came out without patents, many would try to copy it - but only those with something better would win out. That would be great for the consumer, and also for innovation in general!
 
~Shard~

~Shard~

macrumors P6
Jun 4, 2003
18,377
48
1123.6536.5321
hob said:
What is the big deal with patents. If nothing was patented, would the world collapse? No.

If something like the iPhone came out without patents, many would try to copy it - but only those with something better would win out. That would be great for the consumer, and also for innovation in general!
Click to expand...

Kay, you invent a new technology that could make you millions of dollars and before you release it I'll steal it, claim it as my own (or simply market it better than you) make all the money and send you a Christmas card for your troubles. Sounds fair to me!

:p ;) :D
 
Raid

Raid

macrumors 68020
Feb 18, 2003
2,155
4,588
Toronto
edcrosay said:
DVR would make the Apple TV worthwhile. I'd buy one in a heartbeat if it had DVR functionality.
Click to expand...
I'd buy it too if it had DVR functionality

WestonHarvey1 said:
What are you guys really asking for here? <snip>

I love mine, probably because I accept it for what it is. I'm not interested in traditional TV anymore - as soon as I can get the cable news channels in some streaming format, I will happily ditch my DirecTV and my Tivo... Tivo is a band-aid solution that bridges the gap between the past and the future. Once all content is IP delivered, we won't need DVRs at all.
Click to expand...
WestonHarvey, if you're happy with your purchase that's fantastic. However a few of us (as evidence from the above posts) find :apple:TV somewhat lacking, especially if you live in a country that doesn't sell TV content through iTunes. Providing DVR capability through the :apple:TV would provide many users with more content (and utility) from the device. THEN I can begin to escape the mold of "traditional TV", and using the simple and elegant platform that is :apple:TV ....but until that day comes my $350 is going to remain in my pocket. :(
 
Darkroom

Darkroom

Guest
Dec 15, 2006
2,445
0
Montréal, Canada
WestonHarvey1 said:
What are you guys really asking for here? You want the Apple TV to have a CableCard or a satellite tuner in it?

That isn't what the Apple TV is. The content source is intended to be iTunes - in that regard, it is already a DVR - for online content. It is a big iPod for your living room. It is a Mac that runs only FrontRow that goes in your living room. There are lots of metaphors for it, but something that records traditional television is not one of them. That's not what it was intended for.

I love mine, probably because I accept it for what it is. I'm not interested in traditional TV anymore - as soon as I can get the cable news channels in some streaming format, I will happily ditch my DirecTV and my Tivo... Tivo is a band-aid solution that bridges the gap between the past and the future. Once all content is IP delivered, we won't need DVRs at all.

I just wish it had iTunes Store. It's on the iPhone, so it is time for it to make the jump.
Click to expand...

im sorry, but the AppleTV is ass... $299/$399 for an iTunes receiver, a HD and Front Row? please... the AppleTV was specifically designed for yuppies... also, my iPod comes with a screen, did your AppleTV come with a 42" LCD?

until apple includes more useful features like cable/satellite DVR functionality (or even a DVD player!!) into the AppleTV, it'll continue to slide in sales... i can see the apple tv being discontinued easily... maybe it would work in 5-10 years IF the majority of television content is IP delivered (and in countries other than the USA), but until then at least people like you are happy with your AppleTV.

why apple chooses to even market it's Apple TV in their online stores outside of the USA Apple Store is a mystery to me...
 
F

Flobber88

macrumors regular
Jun 19, 2007
100
0
hob said:
What is the big deal with patents. If nothing was patented, would the world collapse? No.

If something like the iPhone came out without patents, many would try to copy it - but only those with something better would win out. That would be great for the consumer, and also for innovation in general!
Click to expand...

The world wouldn't collapse but new technology would suck/be non existent. People innovate for the sole purpose of making cash, and if everyone can steal their final products and inventions Apple Inc. would still be just another computer company.
 
5

50548

Guest
Apr 17, 2005
5,039
2
Currently in Switzerland
Stella said:
If Burst is a ligit company with a product out there, then they aren't really patent trolls. A patent troll is an entity who buys patents , directly or indirectly, without a product and then starts suing. It would be if another company started using multitouch in the same way as Apple's implementation.

Patents are abused and hamper innovation.
Click to expand...

And what the hell is Burst doing with its patents, may you tell me? What products do they have?

Patents are IPR monopolies and should only be granted when real use is made of them...unfortunately, the US leads the way is stupidly frivolous software patents...and it's not gonna change anytime soon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom