View Full Version : What do I do with standard 320gb drive?
Jebaloo
Jan 8, 2008, 07:03 PM
Hi - I'm just working out how to spec my system and need a little advice:
I know that getting the HDs from apple is bad value for money, but I don't know what I'll do with the shipped 320GB drive once I install the 1TB drive that I'm going to buy separately. Ideally I'd like a 1TB drive, and two smaller faster drives for scratch disk - I've not real use for the 320 GB drive.
I had previously been thinking about getting two raptor drives and setting them up as a RAID to make a super-fast scratch drive, but more recently on the forums I've been seeing a lot of comments that current 7200 rpm drives are better value, and very fast compared to the 10,000 rpm raptor drives.
What I'm trying to work out is, could I somehow use the shipped 320GB drive as a fast scratch disk in RAID with another third party drive that I buy? Would the other drive need to be the same size?
In general, if anyone could give me advice for a good value HD setup for photo/film production, that'd be very helpful.
Thanks ( I know there are a lot of threads at the moment grabbing your attention, so thanks again :)
MikeL
Jan 8, 2008, 07:21 PM
Give it away. That's what I'm doing with mine. I've got 2x750GB and 2x500GB that'll be going in my MP. To me, with how dirt cheap storage is at the moment, having 320GB take up an internal bay is a wasted opportunity.
I suppose my other option is to stick it in a USB2/eSATA case I have laying around and use it as a laptop backup drive. I'm using a 160GB for that now.
Too many drives, not enough SATA connectors...
CWallace
Jan 8, 2008, 07:25 PM
You could use the 320GB drive to hold your OS and applications, a separate 1TB drive to store data, and then two high-speed scratch discs.
Or just use the 320GB for the OS and the 1TB for apps and data. Makes OS upgrades easier - no need to back-up your data. :)
oceanzen
Jan 8, 2008, 07:29 PM
Are scratch disks kept blank?
Jebaloo
Jan 8, 2008, 07:36 PM
You could use the 320GB drive to hold your OS and applications, a separate 1TB drive to store data, and then two high-speed scratch discs.
Or just use the 320GB for the OS and the 1TB for apps and data. Makes OS upgrades easier - no need to back-up your data. :)
That sounds like a pretty good idea.
It finds good use for the 320Gb hard drive, but surely it'll be pretty empty with just the OS and applications on it. Even Final Cut, CS3, etc don't take up THAT much space! Good idea though.
Would it be pretty simple to do? Can you think of any obstacles, potential complications with this setup for future use, updates, moving files, installing new stuff etc? I'm pretty good with computers compared to my pals, but no genius.
Jebaloo
Jan 8, 2008, 07:36 PM
Are scratch disks kept blank?
I think they get used on a temporary basis as the data passes over them. Correct me anyone though, as I may be wrong.
ZachPruckowski
Jan 8, 2008, 07:43 PM
What I did with my 1G MacPro's 160GB drive was buy another and RAID0 it, keeping a 400GB one for media. A 320GB drive can be had for super-cheap ($70-80), and a RAID0 gives you 640GB. Yeah, it's software RAID, and there's the slightly higher failure chance, but it's a nice way to get performance and space.
Another option is to use your spare 5.25 inch bay to hold a HDD instead of a second optical drive. Given that you can steal cables that come with your retail drives (the drive chassis on the Mac Pro is cable-free), it's not a terrible option. I'd have to dig out the manual or something, but there are two onboard SATA ports which are supposed to be for SATA optical drives. I think the superdrive in the new ones is still ATA (mine from a year ago is, and I can't find anything to say this one is SATA), so both those ports are free.
You could drag those two SATA ports to a cheap $20 eSATA pass-through, and toss the drive in an eSATA enclosure.
Finally, you could just ship it to me (PM for address). I don't really need it, but I'll use it to replace my 250GB Linux/Windows/VMWare drive.
Maddler
Jan 8, 2008, 07:44 PM
If I install the RAID card, can I then stripe 4 1TB drives together as RAID5 and use that as my boot drive? My media/scratch is on an xserve raid.
krunk
Jan 8, 2008, 07:46 PM
Send it to me. I'll pay the shipping.
kbmb
Jan 8, 2008, 07:51 PM
The 320GB drive only has 8MB cache, while a 500GB has 16MB cache.
I'm thinking don't keep the OS and apps on the 320....that extra cache from a 500GB drive might help speed things up.
-Kevin
Luis Ortega
Jan 8, 2008, 08:01 PM
Why not just upgrade the 320 to a 500 at the time of purchase so you can use it and not waste the drive? It's a cheap upgrade.
Jebaloo
Jan 8, 2008, 08:22 PM
Why not just upgrade the 320 to a 500 at the time of purchase so you can use it and not waste the drive? It's a cheap upgrade.
I suppose I could just use it for extra storage space, the 500GB that is. That and a 1Tb would be pretty useful.
If I were to do RAID on two small drives, what type of drives should I get? (any links would be great)
With so much data, how big would my time machine drive need to be? This will be my first leopard computer and I'm keen to take advantage!
astrostu
Jan 8, 2008, 08:27 PM
Why not just upgrade the 320 to a 500 at the time of purchase so you can use it and not waste the drive? It's a cheap upgrade.
No, it's not a cheap upgrade. $100 to upgrade 320 -> 500 GB is enough to buy an extra $500. It's cheaper to buy a 500 GB separately and sell the 320 or use it for some other purpose.
In my ancient G4, I have 2 120 GB drives (hardware limits me from going any larger). I plan on purchasing 2 500 GB drives in addition to the 320. One 500 will be OS, apps, data, etc. The second will be Time Machine backup. The third will be used for downloads data storage such as ripped movies for iPod, as scratch disk, and as temporary storage with massive photo projects (like my last trip ended up with 20 GB of stuff that on my laptop was horrible to deal with). This will be a huge increase in storage space for me, and I don't think I'm going to fill it up for a long time.
peejack
Jan 8, 2008, 08:28 PM
I dont think the 320gb drive being 8mb cache would make that much difference to apps and os speed.
I was thinking about buying a 32gb 10,000rpm WD drive for os and apps then have the 320gb drive and buy another 500gb drive for storage etc... good idea?
Jebaloo
Jan 8, 2008, 08:33 PM
Thanks for all your input, but everything seems to be pretty contradictory. I think I may be even more confused now!
So you think that the 320 drive would be good for OS and Applications (any spare space I could use for archived data that I wouldn't be accessing simultaneously, so as not to waste good space)?
astrostu
Jan 8, 2008, 08:36 PM
Thanks for all your input, but everything seems to be pretty contradictory. I think I may be even more confused now!
So you think that the 320 drive would be good for OS and Applications (any spare space I could use for archived data that I wouldn't be accessing simultaneously, so as not to waste good space)?
If you've made the decision to keep the 320, I think the concensus is that unless you're a real disk I/O power user, you can keep the OS and apps on the 320 or not, it's up to you (though the question is, how do you have 320 GB of OS and apps?). If you are a power user, then the 16 MB cache vs. the 8 will be a benefit to you and so you may want to keep it on a larger drive that has a larger cache.
For most purposes, I think it's really just up to you with arguments on both sides.
SDAVE
Jan 8, 2008, 08:39 PM
Put it in an external USB2 enclosure and use it as a backup drive...best option.
Jebaloo
Jan 8, 2008, 08:43 PM
If you've made the decision to keep the 320, I think the concensus is that unless you're a real disk I/O power user, you can keep the OS and apps on the 320 or not, it's up to you (though the question is, how do you have 320 GB of OS and apps?). If you are a power user, then the 16 MB cache vs. the 8 will be a benefit to you and so you may want to keep it on a larger drive that has a larger cache.
For most purposes, I think it's really just up to you with arguments on both sides.
Right, thanks. I don't have nearly 320 of OS and Aps! That'd be pretty crazy. I think I might get the 500 and use for OS, Aps, and Archive file storage.
So,
Shipped 500GB (Or, shipped 320, sold on ebay, and then new 500Gb third party drive purchased in replacement)
3rd party 1TB drive
2 x small drives for RAID Scratch disk
externals for back-ups and time machine.
Still not sure what two drives to get for scratch disk.
I'll take it off your hands for the price of postage mate :D
KevinPlusPlus
Jan 8, 2008, 11:22 PM
Do we know what brands of drives Apple has been using for each of the different sizes?
awad
Jan 8, 2008, 11:51 PM
i got the 500gb one as it was only 90 extra with the student discount, could i partition the drive and use half as a scratch disk for photoshop?
McGiord
Jan 8, 2008, 11:57 PM
IMHO: use it as a BootCamp disk, if it's possible and you are interested in doing so.
________
vapormatic (http://www.**************/vapormatic-vaporizer.html)
ZachPruckowski
Jan 9, 2008, 02:27 AM
i got the 500gb one as it was only 90 extra with the student discount, could i partition the drive and use half as a scratch disk for photoshop?
I don't think it would help you much. You'd wind up reading/writing to two disparate spots on the drive, forcing it to do a lot of seeking, and actually costing you time.
awad
Jan 9, 2008, 02:31 AM
dang. oh well. thanks!
imacdaddy
Jan 19, 2008, 10:19 PM
Just wondering why you need 2 scratch disks?
Separate question, if scratch disk is even necessary these days if one has +8GB of RAM?
Norco
Jan 19, 2008, 10:56 PM
What I did was order a second 320gb drive (WD 16mb cache), which I will use for my main OS/Apps, then use hte stock drive for Bootcamp & partition it as well as a scratch disk. Even though the stock drive only has 8mb cache, I figure that it will still make my computer faster by using it as a scratch disk when I'm in OSX.
jnc
Jan 19, 2008, 11:43 PM
Someone fill me in on the purpose of a scratch disk, because I feel like I'm missing out here :(
(Yes, my Mac Pro was a premature purchase I am hoping to "grow into"!! ;))
noi375
Jan 20, 2008, 12:44 AM
Just wondering why you need 2 scratch disks?
Separate question, if scratch disk is even necessary these days if one has +8GB of RAM?
Depends on what you are using - I would imagine HD video editing or something along those lines would create temp files so big that program tend to save them on the hard drive. Not all programs are smart enough to use 3 GB+ of RAM :)
Norco
Jan 20, 2008, 12:54 AM
Someone fill me in on the purpose of a scratch disk, because I feel like I'm missing out here :(
(Yes, my Mac Pro was a premature purchase I am hoping to "grow into"!! ;))
When you are rendering or manipulating pictures programs often create temporary files on your hard drive. By selecting a "scratch disk" for your programs, it will create its temporary files on that instead of the same drive that your OS & Apps are installed on, so it can render stuff faster.
Now with that out of the way, someone said that Photoshop CS3 can only use up to 4gb of system ram, and any more ram than that will be used as a high speed scratch disk. So if you put more memory in your computer, your hard disk scratch disk may not be used as much as you think, but programs differ on their ability to utilize all the system ram or not.
ComeOnDieYoung
Jan 20, 2008, 01:11 AM
Hi - I'm just working out how to spec my system and need a little advice:
I know that getting the HDs from apple is bad value for money, but I don't know what I'll do with the shipped 320GB drive once I install the 1TB drive that I'm going to buy separately. Ideally I'd like a 1TB drive, and two smaller faster drives for scratch disk - I've not real use for the 320 GB drive.
I had previously been thinking about getting two raptor drives and setting them up as a RAID to make a super-fast scratch drive, but more recently on the forums I've been seeing a lot of comments that current 7200 rpm drives are better value, and very fast compared to the 10,000 rpm raptor drives.
What I'm trying to work out is, could I somehow use the shipped 320GB drive as a fast scratch disk in RAID with another third party drive that I buy? Would the other drive need to be the same size?
In general, if anyone could give me advice for a good value HD setup for photo/film production, that'd be very helpful.
Thanks ( I know there are a lot of threads at the moment grabbing your attention, so thanks again :)
i'll take it
macenforcer
Jan 20, 2008, 04:13 AM
This is precisely the problem with the crappy hard drives they put in the stock machines. Everyone takes them out. Might as well sell it without a hard drive and know a few bucks off, or better yet STOP SELLING ram and hard drives for 5 times what they are worth APPLE.
Graphis
Jan 20, 2008, 04:17 AM
I ordered my Mac Pro from a 3rd party vendor: I specified that I wanted the original 320GB drive in Bay 1 replaced with a 500GB drive. What they actually did, at no extra cost, was leave the 320 in bay 1, and put a 500 in bay 2.
I use Adobe CS2 the most (upgrading to CS3 as soon as I can afford it), and I do some 3D work too.
Some of the programmes I use, like the 3D, expect extra data to be added (new 3D models, textures etc) directly into the programme itself, thus continually increasing its size. Would it be a good idea to devote the 320 solely to programmes and OS for me, as it would still keep growing? All together, I'm guessing it would take up about half the drive.
Porcellio
Jan 20, 2008, 05:00 PM
Do we know what brands of drives Apple has been using for each of the different sizes?
?
krunk
Jan 20, 2008, 05:06 PM
This is precisely the problem with the crappy hard drives they put in the stock machines. Everyone takes them out. Might as well sell it without a hard drive and know a few bucks off, or better yet STOP SELLING ram and hard drives for 5 times what they are worth APPLE.
If hiking up the price for the drives/ram allows them to continue offering the core machine at such an amazing price, I say keep it up.
imacdaddy
Jan 20, 2008, 05:39 PM
Do we know what brands of drives Apple has been using for each of the different sizes?
From what I've seen on the internet, 320GB and 500GB drives offered on the new MP are from Hitachi. I haven't seen pics for the higher capacity drives.
awad
Jan 20, 2008, 06:39 PM
From what I've seen on the internet, 320GB and 500GB drives offered on the new MP are from Hitachi. I haven't seen pics for the higher capacity drives.
my 500gb drive is from seagate.
macenforcer
Jan 20, 2008, 07:46 PM
My 320GB is a Western Digital.
JesterJJZ
Jan 21, 2008, 02:03 AM
I put mine in the second optical bay and connected it to the extra sata port.
krye
Feb 14, 2008, 10:27 AM
I plan on using the 320 for the OS and applications, and maybe my iLife and iTunes librabries (~60G).
Most of my data will be on a 2nd 500G drive. I will then use my current 500G external for Time Machine. At some point (probably when I run out of space), I'll upgrade the external to 1T.
pprior
Feb 14, 2008, 12:59 PM
Drobo
GroundLoop
Feb 14, 2008, 01:41 PM
My 320GB is a Western Digital.
And my 320GB drive is a Seagate Barracuda 7200.10.
Hickman
bilbo--baggins
Feb 14, 2008, 02:08 PM
I took mine straight out, put it in an antistatic bag, and put it away. If the Mac needs to go for repair, or when I eventually sell it, I'll put the unused drive back in.
mkrad
Feb 14, 2008, 02:19 PM
320Gb was a Seagate replaced w/4x Hitachi 750Gb 32Mb 7200's
jb60606
Feb 14, 2008, 02:54 PM
Wrap it up in an anti-static bag, and keep it somewhere safe. It'll come in handy if you ever have to send your MP back to Apple for repair.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.