PDA

View Full Version : Votescam - your vote doesn't count




Pinto
Oct 28, 2003, 04:17 AM
_The Votescam investigation began in 1970, in – surprise!-- Dade County, Florida, where Ken ran for Congress (with Jim as his campaign manager) against Claude Pepper, the “Father of Social Security.”

The Colliers were researching a book they were writing for Dell Publishing titled: “Running Through the System: Ballots Not Bullets,” an idea born from their involvement in the social upheaval of the sixties.

Ken was rigged out of the election through a vote scam, which the Colliers later discovered was used throughout the country for decades. It went like this: The local newscaster would announce during the broadcast of election returns that election “computer has broken down.” Instead of giving official returns from the County courthouse, the networks would be running vote “projections” for the rest of the night.

Jim and Ken, who had garnered 30 percent of the vote and were excited about running again, noticed that when the vote totals came back on the screen after the announcement, they had mysteriously lost 15 percentage points. They didn’t get another vote for the rest of the night.

This piqued their interest.

When they examined the “official” election results from the Secretary of State’s office for the September primary, October run-off and November final election in Dade County, the record listed a total of 141,000 votes cast for the Governors race – in each election. The exact same number of total votes were cast for three elections with a different number of candidates running each time. The same identical figures were listed for the Senate race – 122,000 votes cast in the primary, run-off and final election.

This, of course, is a statistical impossibility.

When they compared the “official” vote results with a print-out of the vote “projections” broadcast by the TV networks on the final election night, they found that channel 4 had “projected” with near perfect accuracy the results of 40 races with 250 candidates only 4 minutes after the polls closed. Channel 7 came even closer; at 9:31 pm, they “projected” the final vote total for a race at 96,499 votes. When the Colliers checked the “official” number . . . it was also 96,499.

_“In hockey, they call that a hat trick,” the Colliers write. “In politics, we call it a fix.”

The networks then made the astonishing claim that the results from a single voting machine somewhere in Dade County were run through a computer program in order to get these vote projections.

Elton Davis was the computer programmer responsible for the magic formula that could convert one machine’s vote results into near perfect projected vote totals for 40 races and 250 candidates. When Jim and Ken confronted Davis in his office at the University of Miami, he responded: “You’ll never prove it, now get out.”

Finally the networks claimed that members of the League of Women Voters were out in the field on election night, calling in vote totals to channels 4 and 7.

When the Colliers confronted the head of the League, Joyce Deiffenderfer, she admitted that there were no LWV members out in the field that night. She broke down crying, saying “I don’t want to get caught up in this thing.”

But there’s more.

According to the print-out of the TV network’s election night “projections,” the networks were not receiving any actual voting results at any time during their broadcast, but had been using their own projections from the moment the polls closed. When they claimed that the courthouse computer had broken down, and they would no longer be reporting actual vote totals, they were lying. They had never been reporting actual vote totals.

However, the final shoe dropped months later when an official press release appeared from Dade data processing chief, Leonard White, which stated emphatically: The county computer at the courthouse was never down, and it was never slow. __When the famous Miami lawyer Ellis Rubin agreed to be Ombudsman for the original Votescam evidence, he brought it to the Florida assistant State Attorney at the time, Janet Reno. The evidence included the shaved wheels of lever voting machines, forged canvass sheets (the sheets that poll workers sign to verify the final vote count), and pre-printed vote tally sheets that were used in conjunction with a lever machine vote rigging device called the Printomatic.R


Another notable Votescam criminal can now be found sitting on the bench of the highest court in the nation. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, while still a Federal Appeals Judge, single handedly destroyed what would have been an historic lawsuit filed against Justice Department lawyer Craig Donsanto, who had refused to prosecute the extensive vote fraud evidence brought to him by the Colliers. The evidence included videotape of the League of Women voters tampering with ballots in a close door vote “counting” session. The women were illegally punching holes in already cast ballots. When confronted by Jim and Ken, just minutes before the two were bodily thrown from the building (which they had snuck into), the women claimed they were only trying to remove_ . . . the hanging chad.

Thanks in part to the recent Bush approved Help America Vote Act (HAVA), squadrons of shiny new Touch Screen Trojan horses are being rolled into precincts across America. Not, as we are told, to make voting easier or more accurate, or to help disabled people vote privately, or to save America from the dangers of hanging chad and butterfly ballots -- no. The real reason America is being flooded with billions of dollars worth of paperless computerized voting machines is so that no one will ever again be able to prove vote fraud.


__These machines are not just unverifiable, they are secretly programmed (their software is not open to scrutiny by election officials or computer experts), equipped with modems, accessible by computer, telephone, and satellite. They are the final product of decades of work by the election rigging industry. When they are installed in every precinct in America, our elections will finally become completely meaningless, nothing more than charades behind which criminal thugs will wield the power of this nation.

link (http://truthout.org/docs_03/102503C.shtml)



Desertrat
Oct 28, 2003, 07:35 AM
Looks like the "easy way" of high-tech stuff will still jump up and bite your butt.

Our little precinct off in the middle of Southwest Nowhere still uses the old-fashoned paper ballots; just mark an "X". Dunno how long that will continue...

It's amazing how people can mess up and invalidate a ballot. One example is marking the box for a party's slate of candidates, and then marking the box for a candidate from another party. Or, marking two boxes in one race.

'Rat

zimv20
Oct 28, 2003, 10:16 AM
if only election stealing piqued interest like blowjobs do...

Desertrat
Oct 28, 2003, 05:23 PM
zim, part of the problem is that a stolen election is of interest only to the losers, who hope to come out ahead in the next vote-stealing effort.

Reminds me of "Landslide Lyndon" and his 87-vote margin of victory in the 1952 Senate race in Texas. One of his supporters, laughing about all the cemetary voters, commented that opponent Coke Stevenson's people "...were stealing votes, too; they just got scared and quit first."

'Rat

Pinto
Oct 28, 2003, 05:52 PM
Why so much disinterest?

Are people over there happy to be living in a pretend Democracy?

Look at the debate generated by gun ownership, why is that a more important issue than being lied and cheated to by the people who are supposed to be representing your ideals?

coolsoldier
Nov 2, 2003, 10:12 PM
Originally posted by Pinto
Why so much disinterest?

Are people over there happy to be living in a pretend Democracy?

Look at the debate generated by gun ownership, why is that a more important issue than being lied and cheated to by the people who are supposed to be representing your ideals?

Yes, the wrong issues form the political debate in most of the country, primarily because politicians are the ones shaping the political debate. To get elected, they have to find "hotbed" issues that they can get a majority of the population to both care and agree on. Unfortunately, on the issues that really matter there are too many different positions for any one of them to ever get a majority.

K4NN4B15
Nov 3, 2003, 10:57 AM
Too many different opinions on..... voterscam?