Category: Opinion/Interviews
Link: Five reasons not to buy an iPod
Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by arn
Since each MP3 CD holds about 10 hours of music, you could carry 20 CD-Rs in a CD wallet and have about the same amount of music that fits on the 15GB iPod.
I think some of their CEO's invested in other online music companies.Originally posted by ALoLA
What's with all the recent Apple bashing by CNet?
Of course, if you don't care about low battery life, aren't fond of jogging, have ample disposable income, don't need to record/encode music portably, and want to purchase music downloads only from the iTunes Music Store, then the iPod is the best the way to go.
File transfers were 0.86MB per second over USB 1.1 and, as one would expect, a speedier 2.4MB per second over USB 2.0. This means you can fill the player's 15GB capacity (about 280 hours of music at 128Kps) in approximately 5 hours over USB 1.1, or in about 1.75 hours if your computer has USB 2.0.
Originally posted by 1macker1
I think this article is a good one. Much better than the "all praise apple" articles. It seems to point out some of the bad things some people might not like about the iPOD. This is the type of article that is needed. A non bias one. He complains about all the things he dislike without bashing. And in the end he still goes to say that the iPod is still by far the best MP3 player out there.
While I understand the idea behind your article, I wonder, what exactly the purpose it. Why are you trying to convince people NOT to buy an excellent MP3 player, not to mention the best one on the market? What service are you performing? You're not enlightening people on a better product, nor are you suggesting things Apple should do to improve an already great product. No, what you're doing is giving people excuses to NOT buy a really great product, and at the same time, promoting the inferior alternatives, citing what little advantages they do have over it. "Dell DJ has better battery life, so don't buy an iPod, buy a Dell DJ!" Unless, of course, you want a new, untested product with so-so reviews and barely any support from a company notorious for grotesque customer service practices...
You've already reviewed the iPod against the others, and it won. I don't understand why you feel the need to "re-review" the products, but now only review other products strengths against the iPod's few weaknesses. It reeks of an agenda of some sort, but for the life of me I can't figure out what you're trying to gain. Your last paragraph is particularly ridiculous:
"Of course, if you don't care about low battery life, aren't fond of jogging, have ample disposable income, don't need to record/encode music portably, and want to purchase music downloads only from the iTunes Music Store, then the iPod is the best the way to go. "
Translation: you'd be an idiot to buy the ipod, the best MP3 player in the world, because it's not perfect. Not that any of these others are even half as good, but still, you're a jackass.
Keep looking for iPod killers! I'm sure you'll find one eventually. I myself am constantly on the lookout for DVD killers, beacuse DVD's don't fit in the cigar box I've decided to keep my movies in...
Originally posted by paulwhannel
i think someone is missing the point... who would rather dig through 20 CD-Rs with tens or hundreds of MP3s on 'em, rather than simply scrolling to a song? anyone that has an iPod knows why the above is inane.
and yes, i realize he was giving alternatives for niche markets. but i simply don't think you can compare an MP3-CD player to an iPod... especially for cost purposes. they're entirely different devices and are in entirely different classes.
pnw