What's to hype, really? The iPhone going 3G means little to Americans, since US carriers employ antiquated 2.5G technology, and for Europeans and others it simply means that they're getting the iPhone, period. The iPhone supporting 3G is nothing to hype in countries where 3G has been the standard for ages, it simply means that the iPhone is a normal phone now. To advertise "iPhone - now with 3G" would be kinda like "Ford cars - now with seat belts!". It's assumed that cars have seat belts and rather embarrassing that this is a new "feature". Hopefully the iP2 has some other cool stuff that will be the main selling point.the title says it. how might apple achieve this goal? i just think something is missing at that moment, just a piece that would brew up the media and potential buyers!
what do you think about that?
What's to hype, really? The iPhone going 3G means little to Americans, since US carriers employ antiquated 2.5G technology
Hopefully the iP2 has some other cool stuff that will be the main selling point.
Sold! Not. 😀One stunning feature will be, "now available in your country."
Verizon and Sprint have had EVDO deployed in the US for ages now. 😕What's to hype, really? The iPhone going 3G means little to Americans, since US carriers employ antiquated 2.5G technology
If you haven't already seen how they pushed it in the US:If they try to push it from the PDA angle, it won't work...
Sold! Not. 😀 It appears (from this side of the pond anyway) that the big challenge for Apple was going up against Blackberry
Well, then it's even more puzzling that Apple didn't just go ahead and make the iPhone 3G compatible right from the beginning, with the added bonus of being able to sell it around the globe. Maybe they were just hell bent on forcing Americans to pay twice for an iPhone, while the rest of us get away with a single purchase?Verizon and Sprint have had EVDO deployed in the US for ages now. 😕
Yeah, I've seen quite a few of them here in Sweden. Some are probably from the UK, while others have been picked up on vacations and business trips to the US. The US was never a common vacation spot before, but now that the USD is in the Peso ballpark it's gotten quite popular.Although with hundreds of thousands of them being purchased per quarter in the US for re-sale (on the gray market) on your side of the pond, I'm wondering the iPhone needs any pushing at all? 😀
Well, then it's even more puzzling that Apple didn't just go ahead and make the iPhone 3G compatible right from the beginning, with the added bonus of being able to sell it around the globe. Maybe they were just hell bent on forcing Americans to pay twice for an iPhone, while the rest of us get away with a single purchase?
And you buy that?Apple's official explanation is that given the current iPhone design, the 3G chip was too big a drain on the battery.
Can we get rid of this condescending European idiot?
You might want to tone down your attitude since you're playing catch-up regarding actual facts.
Apple's official explanation is that given the current iPhone design, the 3G chip was too big a drain on the battery. AT&T's 3G network was also not ideal at the time iPhone was launched. They've boosted their EDGE and 3G coverage since last June.
Can we get rid of everyone who takes any mention of nationality personally? I'm talking about the fact that American carriers are lazy when it comes to rolling out new technology. This has nothing to do with you or any other American private citizen. You, AT&T and Dubya are not a singular entity.Can we get rid of this condescending European idiot?
Can we get rid of this condescending European idiot?
You, AT&T and Dubya are not a singular entity.
If marginally higher power drain had been a valid reason to omit a feature, Apple has bigger fish to fry, seeing as video playback or high backlight settings kills the iPhone dead 10 times faster than 3G does.
Actually, AT&T used to be a Cingular entity.
(I'll get my coat now.)
If a component that's been commonplace for several years in phones from every other manufacturer on the market is too big a power drain, then either the product has a very weak battery, or you're being fed a really poor excuse.
International sales account for 45% of Apple's revenue. MacOS supports 50 languages. All Apple products except the iPhone have been made available on the same day in the US and the rest of the world. You may not give a crap about the rest of the world, but Apple does -- never more so than now, when overseas revenue is worth more $$$ than ever.Anuba may want to get his head out of his bum considering Apple is an American company and made the phone primarily for an American audience.
It's easier to cover 3,930,000 square miles (Europe) than 3,794,066 square miles (USA)? If you say so. Personally I think it has more to do with the fact that 712 million people have more cash burning in their pocket than 304 million do.Whoopty doo, Europe has 3G. It's a little easier when you aren't trying to cover as much territory.
I've had a job in the communications industry for 12 years now. I could get a second one, but then I'd have way too little spare time and way too much money.If you really know as much as you think you do, go get a job in the communications industry.
Yes, that's true. I just resent the notion that 3G is a problem and the battery isn't. There's something very off about Apple's approach to problem solving sometimes.Also, Anuba, you're neglecting to take into account that the heavy, heavy internet usage of the average iPhone user vs. regular phone/smartphone users means that 3G would, indeed, pose a significant increase battery drain compared to lower-powered EDGE. Just having 3G doesn't make much of a difference, but web surfing and YouTubing on 3G for extended periods could very well slaughter battery life.
Actually, AT&T used to be a Cingular entity.
(I'll get my coat now.)
And you buy that?
Video playback and a bright screen were seen as necessities. Indeed, they would've sold few iPhones if they didn't play video or had dull screens.
Lack of 3G has not been a major concern for most users. Everything we've read so far indicates that enabling 3G and using it would reduce battery charge by a few hours. Your example makes no sense - of course it won't affect the battery if you keep the phone on standby and don't actually transfer anything over 3G.
Your attitude is profoundly annoying, and you're not contributing anything other than cheap shots and ignore-the-facts speculation.
*walks JNC out of the thread*
Also, Anuba, you're neglecting to take into account that the heavy, heavy internet usage of the average iPhone user vs. regular phone/smartphone users means that 3G would, indeed, pose a significant increase battery drain compared to lower-powered EDGE. Just having 3G doesn't make much of a difference, but web surfing and YouTubing on 3G for extended periods could very well slaughter battery life.
Wait, what? That sounds completely different from what you said a few days ago. 😕International sales account for 45% of Apple's revenue. MacOS supports 50 languages. All Apple products except the iPhone have been made available on the same day in the US and the rest of the world. You may not give a crap about the rest of the world, but Apple does -- never more so than now, when overseas revenue is worth more $$$ than ever.
Yeah, that Return key is bizarre... but it's no newsflash that Apple are fiercely US-centric and don't give a crap about other countries, but they still want their money so they put in just the minimum effort needed to get by.
Many OSX translations are pretty lousy. iWorks is only available in English, French and German, while M$ Office is available in any obscure language of your choosing. It took aeons for the Weather widget to recognize any location outside the US (when I tried to set it to Stockholm, Sweden it would point to Stockholm, New Jersey). The iTunes stores outside the US carry pretty much nothing, especially in terms of video content, but Apple tries to cram Apple TV down European throats anyway. And don't get me started on the iPhone which was tailor made for some outdated network type used only in the US, and legacy supported in some European countries. Took them a year to figure out what the rest of the world uses. You never see such cocky nonchalance from companies like Microsoft, Logitech, Dell, HP or others. And now that the US dollar is barely worth the paper it's printed on, you'd think Apple would seize the opportunity for some competitive pricing in Europe, for once, but instead they're seizing the opportunity to make extra extra truckloads of cash, leading to the worst US vs. International price ratio in the company's history. In Sweden, the Mac Pro starts at the equivalent of 4000 USD... that's the US price + 43%. Yeah, go ahead, rob the eurotrash...
No, it's all the same thing. Apple wants that international cash badly -- hence they make feeble attempts at localizations, they put up iTunes stores in various countries and generally try to convey the notion that they care and that these markets are soooo important. But they secretly wish they could just stuff a big rancid dookie in the international market's fat face, and sometimes it shows, like when they scoffed at 3G and decided that the iPhone would be for American eyes only.Wait, what? That sounds completely different from what you said a few days ago. 😕