PDA

View Full Version : Clark and voting rights




Sayhey
Dec 29, 2003, 09:22 PM
Wesley Clark is in Birmingham today and gave a speech (http://www.clark04.com/speeches/024/) at the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church there. What impressed me about the speech was the upfront criticism of tactics of the Republicans to deny the vote to african americans. Clark makes no bones about the fact that he thinks in 2000 the only "vote that George W. Bush won was the one that took place in the chambers of the United States Supreme Court." I like the fact he went to what is hollowed ground for many who lived through and remember the days of the civil rights movement. I like the fight in this speech; it might even convince this middle-aged lefty to vote for a General.

General Wesley K. Clark
Remarks on Voting Rights

Birmingham, AL
December 29, 2003



It's an honor to be here with you today. I just finished touring this church, and, like anyone who's been here, all I could think about were those four little girls.

All they were doing that day was going to church, dressed in their Sunday best for the 11 o'clock service. They weren't civil rights leaders. They weren't marching on Washington or over a bridge at Selma.

They didn't volunteer. They were chosen.

Denise McNair, Carole Robertson, Cynthia Wesley, and Addie Mae Collins were just children caught in the midst of a great struggle for their future -- a future that they would not live to see.

Those who took their lives sought to spread hatred in a place of love. But standing here today, surrounded by all of you, it's clear that they failed in their mission.

These girls' deaths were a wakeup call to this nation - a call that galvanized the civil rights movement and ultimately led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

It was just like Dr. Martin Luther King said: these girls "died nobly...as the martyred heroines of a holy crusade for freedom and human dignity."

Today, as far as we've come, that crusade is far from over.

In 2003, the African-American unemployment rate is 10.2 % -- nearly double the national average.

In 2003, 7 million African Americans don't have health insurance. The rate of African Americans without health insurance is a third higher than the national average.

In 2003, nearly a quarter of African Americans live in poverty -- twice the national average. And nearly 1 in 3 black children live in poverty - that's five million children.

And in 2003, as far as we've come, African Americans are still too often robbed of their most basic civil right: the right to vote.

That's what I want to talk about today.

In March 1965, now Congressman John Lewis led the famous voting rights march from Selma to Montgomery, right over the Edmund Pettus Bridge.

On Bloody Sunday, hundreds of peaceful marchers were attacked by police, and many lost their lives.

But their sacrifice brought Lyndon Johnson the support he needed to sign the Voting Rights Act.

That Spring, addressing a Joint Session of Congress, Johnson stated for all the world to hear, that it wasn't just African Americans, but all Americans, "who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice." And he promised the nation that "we shall overcome."

The sad truth is - we haven't.

In the year 2003, we are far from the fundamental ideal of "one person, one vote."

In America, your vote is your voice. That's what our democracy was built on. And our nation can't move forward if we silence the voices of any of our citizens.

We all know what happened in the 2000 election, when the only vote that George W. Bush won was the one that took place in the chambers of the United States Supreme Court.

It was an election marred by broken voting machines, outdated technology, and hanging chads.

It was an election where blacks and other minorities were disproportionately turned away from the polls, purged from the voting rolls, and intimidated when they showed up to vote.

And in the end, when it came to counting up the votes, the ballots cast by African Americans and other minorities were disproportionately undercounted. The victims of this debacle were people like Lavonna Lewis.

On Election Day 2000, Lavonna, an African American woman and first-time time voter, was told by a poll worker that the poll was closed.

As she turned to leave, that same poll worker allowed a white man to walk in and get in line to vote.

Sadly, Lavonna was just one of thousands of minorities who were shut out of the voting booth.

This is not what those four little girls gave their lives for.

And in many ways, the response to the election was as much of an injustice as the election itself.

After what happened in Florida, there was a whole lot of hand-wringing, but no real change.

People called for investigations, for election reform, for a complete overhaul of the voting system in America.

What did they get?

No serious investigation.

No election reform.

Nothing but a congressional bill that fewer than half the states have enforced.

Make no mistake about it, the Help America Vote Act is a good bill. It's the first time the federal government has set high standards for state election officials to follow, including guidelines for voting equipment and statewide voter registration databases. And it gives states the funds to comply with them.

I commend Chris Dodd for his leadership in getting this bill passed. But the bill still hasn't been fully funded, and many states are dragging their feet in implementing it.

The result is that today, it's only one person one vote if you live in the right county.

And if you vote at the right machine.

And if your name happens to be on the rolls.

Well, last I checked, there was no "if" in the 15th Amendment. One person one vote isn't just a slogan -- it's the highest law of this land.

We shouldn't have to wait for another Florida to fully fund election reform. Congress should get to work and put their money where their mouth is. And states need to buckle down now, and demand stiff penalties for election officials who turn away registered voters or purge them from the rolls.

As a candidate, I'm going to talk about this struggle every chance I get to make sure that in the 2004 election, we truly achieve one person one vote.

To do so, we're going to take the following three steps.

First, we're going to identify and bring attention to hot spots where there are recurrent voting problems, paying special attention to places where African-American and other minorities were illegally turned away from the polls on election day 2000.

Second, we're going to train campaign volunteers across the nation to work to ensure that voters are registered, can get to the polls, and are allowed to cast their votes.

Third, I want to put the Republican Party on notice: We're going to appoint a legal team to monitor the 2004 election carefully, and if anyone is intimidated, or turned away from the polls illegally, we will push to prosecute the perpetrators to the full extent of the law.

This is a very personal issue for me. I spent thirty-four years in the United States military defending this right - starting back in 1963, when I was a student at West Point. Back then, we were fighting to protect America from threats to our democracy abroad. And equally patriotic young people were fighting here on American soil to make sure we lived up to the ideals of that democracy.

We won our fight against communism. But the struggle against racial bigotry and ignorance is far from over.

Today, I want to promise you that as President, I will not rest until we win that struggle. Until every single American can cast their vote, and every single one of those votes is counted. We owe those four little girls nothing less.

Thank you.



mactastic
Dec 30, 2003, 02:14 PM
Nice. Clark has the fire in the belly to be CIC. Notice how he now has a campaign ad in NH showing him receiving a medal from Bill Clinton. Finally someone not afraid to run from the Clinton legacy. This kind of civil rights stuff will play well in the southern states where getting the minority vote out can decide which way the state votes.

Dont Hurt Me
Dec 30, 2003, 02:44 PM
Its time to can the electoral college, simply add up everyones vote and who ever has the most wins.

Sayhey
Dec 30, 2003, 02:53 PM
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
Its time to can the electoral college, simply add up everyones vote and who ever has the most wins.

Don't Hurt Me,

You and I agree completely on the electoral college. What do you think of Clark's speech? His focus is on the southern states, and I would be interested in how his campaign is playing, especially in South Carolina.

mac, I hope this speech wasn't just for the benefit of a black audience. If he mentions nothing about the 2000 election and voter intimidation in front of white audiences, I will be very disappointed. Wouldn't be the first time a candidate has done that, but it would not bode well. I expect candidates to tailor their speeches to some degree, it is just matter of how great a difference there is from audience to audience. I'll be keeping track.

Dont Hurt Me
Dec 30, 2003, 03:08 PM
A lot of what he says is true everyone should be treated equal period. but the black population has a very big culture problem and that is a majority of the children dont live with a mother and father. they grow up with out a dad around because dad is gone. I live in South Carolina and its everywhere kids born out of wedlock. I think its between 50-70% now think about that. How are you going to mold a child into a person without Mom & Dad. sure it can happen but what is happening is these kids grow up and start getting into trouble hence the large population in jail.
I dont see any leglislation that can change a culture and not having a nuclear family i believe is the biggest roadblock to turning these numbers that Clark talks about around.

Sayhey
Dec 30, 2003, 04:00 PM
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
A lot of what he says is true everyone should be treated equal period. but the black population has a very big culture problem and that is a majority of the children dont live with a mother and father. they grow up with out a dad around because dad is gone. I live in South Carolina and its everywhere kids born out of wedlock. I think its between 50-70% now think about that. How are you going to mold a child into a person without Mom & Dad. sure it can happen but what is happening is these kids grow up and start getting into trouble hence the large population in jail.
I dont see any leglislation that can change a culture and not having a nuclear family i believe is the biggest roadblock to turning these numbers that Clark talks about around.

You raise a very different, if interrelated, problem than what the thread is about. First, let me say that there are all kinds of reasons for the growth of single parent households. I think it is just not correct to say that this growth in the Black community is a reflection of some kind of defect in Black Culture. Having said that, I do think that there is a problem of hopelessness and marginalization of young urban youth that effects young black men disproportionally to others. If one grows up in a life where little hope of a meaningful job or inclusion is on the horizon it has a powerful effect on how you view life and others. I don't think it is possible to solve the problem of fatherless households in any area of our country without keeping that in mind for young men of whatever ethnic background. I think the only way forward is to acknowledge that these young men are our sons and as such we, as a society, have to show that their futures are important to us.

Does that mean that there is no individual responsibility on the part of young men who father children and then leave them for others to care for? I don't think so for a minute. If my own son did so I would be all over him concerning his responsibility to his child and my grandchild. I'm all for the enforcement of deadbeat dad legislation. I'm also for early education about the responsibilities that go along with sex, and sexual education in general. It is not only in the black community in which we celebrate the "player" who is involved with many women.

I guess what I'm trying to say, is that it will take a multitude of approaches to turn the problem around. Moral condemnation alone will not get us anywhere, especially if it is by way of the stigmatization of an entire culture.

rainman::|:|
Dec 30, 2003, 04:03 PM
Clark is trying really hard to endear himself to minorities, courting many of Clinton's old voters. I'm helping grassroots campaign for the Iowa primaries, taking place in a few short weeks :eek:

Dean may be able to take the primaries, but Clark is the only one that'll win against Bush.

paul

Sayhey
Dec 30, 2003, 04:17 PM
Originally posted by paulwhannel
Clark is trying really hard to endear himself to minorities, courting many of Clinton's old voters. I'm helping grassroots campaign for the Iowa primaries, taking place in a few short weeks :eek:

Dean may be able to take the primaries, but Clark is the only one that'll win against Bush.

paul

I hope you're wrong about that Paul. Let's make a determination about that when we see how well Clark, Dean, and others actually do in the primaries.

I'm glad the Clark campaign is reaching out to minority voters. I noticed the first two national chairman are black. I didn't even think Andrew Young was interested in national politics anymore.

Lastly, Paul, I thought Clark had pulled out of Iowa -- what are you doing there?

mactastic
Jan 1, 2004, 10:53 AM
Originally posted by Sayhey
mac, I hope this speech wasn't just for the benefit of a black audience. If he mentions nothing about the 2000 election and voter intimidation in front of white audiences, I will be very disappointed. Wouldn't be the first time a candidate has done that, but it would not bode well. I expect candidates to tailor their speeches to some degree, it is just matter of how great a difference there is from audience to audience. I'll be keeping track.

I'm not implying that the speech is soley aimed at blacks or anything like that, I think Clark is better than that, but it should help him in an area where the Dems are weak right now, the south. I sure hope he continues this kind of talk, the issue of voting rights needs airing.